The Effects of Technically Adequate Instructional Data on Achievement

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to ascertain the effects of manipulating the data base used for instructional decision making on student achievement. The dependent data were the number of words read correctly by 117 students on three basal reading passages. Students were rank ordered by the degree of implementation of a technically adequate curriculum-based measurement and evaluation system. The top 27% were compared to the bottom 27% by means of t tests on the scores. A significant difference was found between high and low implementation groups on one reading passage; differences between scores on two other passages were not significant but were in the same direction, supporting the hypothesis that a high degree of implementation of a technically adequate data system does lead to greater achievement. The discussion addresses implications for teaching practices.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Deno, S. L. , Mirkin, P. K. , & Chiang, B. (1982). Identifying valid measures of reading for use in continuous evaluation of educational programs. Exceptional Children, 49, 36–47.

Fuchs, L. S. , Deno, S. L. , & Mirkin, P. K. (in press). The effects of frequent curriculum-based measurement and evaluation on pedagogy, student achievement, and student awareness of learning. American Education Research Journal.

Jackson, P. (1968). Life in the classroom. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

King, R. P. , Deno, S. L. , Mirkin, P. , & Wesson, C. (1983). The effects of training teachers in the use of formative evaluation in reading: An experimental-control comparison (Research Report No. 111). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities.

Marston, D. , Lowry, L. , Deno, S. , & Mirkin, P. (1981). An analysis of learning trends in simple measures of reading, spelling, and written expression: A longitudinal study (Research Report No. 49). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities.

Mirkin, P. , Deno, S. , Fuchs, L. , Wesson, C. , Tindal, G. , Marston, D. , & Kuehnle, K. (1981). Procedures to develop and monitor progress on IEP goals. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities.

Potter, M. , & Mirkin, P. (1982). Instructional planning and implementation practices of elementary and secondary resource room teachers: Is there a difference? (Research Report No. 65). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities.

Shavelson, R. J. What is the basic teaching skill? (1973). The Journal of Teacher Education, 14, 144–151.

Shavelson, R. J. , & Borko, H. (1979). Research on teachers' decisions in planning instruction. Educational Horizons, 57, 183–189.

10.

Shavelson, J. R. , Caldwell, J. , & Izu, T. (1977). Teachers' sensitivity to the reliability of information in making decisions. American Educational Research Journal, 14, 83–97.

11.

Skiba, R. , Wesson, C. , & Deno, S. L. (1982). The effects of training teachers in the use of formative evaluation in reading: An experimental-control comparison (Research Report No. 88). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities.

12.

White, O. R. , & Haring, N. G. (1976). Exceptional teaching: A multimedia training package. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.