BenskyJ.M.Public Law 94–142 and stress: A problem for educators.Exceptional Children, 1980, 47, 24–29.
2.
BlaschkeC.Case study of the implementation of P.L. 94–142 (final report). Washington, D.C.: Education Turnkey Systems, 1979.
3.
KatzenK.To the editor: An open letter to CEC.Exceptional Children, 1980, 46, 582.
4.
LiebermanM.Special ed could be ed's special nemesis.New York Daily News, October 19, 1980.
5.
RauthM.Education for All Handicapped Children Act: Protecting both children and teachers’ rights.Washington, D.C.: American Federation of Teachers,1979.
6.
ReynoldsM.C.The expanding implications of P.L. 94–142. In-service presentation, National Council of States on Inservice Education, Syracuse University, October 1980. p. 15–18.
7.
Second Annual Report to Congress on the Implementation of Public Law 94–142: The Education for All Handicapped Children Act.Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services, 1980.
8.
StearnsM.S., GreeneD., & DavidJ.O.Local implementation of P.L. 94–142: First year report of a longitudinal study.Menlo Park, Calif.: Stanford Research Institute International, April 1980.