Peer relationships and social interactions in the classroom can facilitate learning, and peer-mediated interventions (PMIs) are frequently used to support the development and quality of social interactions between students with intellectual and developmental disabilities (I/DDs) and their peers. This meta-analysis examined extant literature on PMI for secondary students with I/DD. We identified 37 studies and dissertations for inclusion in this review. Effect size (ES) estimates demonstrate significant positive effects in both group design (ES = 1.38) and single-case design (ES = 1.96). Across intervention types, peer networks (ES = 2.20) and peer support arrangements (ES = 2.25) produced larger effects than peer initiation/response interventions (ES = 1.53). Overall findings suggest that PMIs are efficacious in supporting social interactions between secondary students with I/DD and their peers and can be feasibly and successfully implemented by educators in school settings.
BambaraL. M. (2022). Appreciating individual differences: A response to Beechey and Keates. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 65(4), 1604–1606. https://doi.org/10.1044/2021_JSLHR-21-00630
2.
BambaraL. M.ChovanesJ.ThomasA.ColeC. L. (2016). Effective peer-mediated strategies for improving the conversational skills of adolescents with autism. Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups, 1(1), 29–36. https://doi.org/10.1044/persp1.SIG1.29
3.
BambaraL. M.ColeC. L.ChovanesJ.TelesfordA.ThomasA.TsaiS.-C.AyadE.BilgiliI. (2018). Improving the assertive conversational skills of adolescents with autism spectrum disorder in a natural context. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 48, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2018.01.002
4.
BeecheyT. (2022). On perspective taking in conversation and in research: A comment on Bambara et al. (2021). Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 65(4), 1597–1599. https://doi.org/10.1044/2021_JSLHR-21-00606
5.
BorensteinM.HedgesL. V.HigginsJ. P.RothsteinH. R. (2010). A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis. Research Synthesis Methods, 1(2), 97–111. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.12
6.
BrockM. E.HuberH. B. (2017). Are peer support arrangements an evidence-based practice? A systematic review. The Journal of Special Education, 51(3), 150–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466917708184
7.
CamarataS. (2022). Balancing respect for individuals, human rights, neurodiversity, and positive behavioral support in intervention research for a spectrum of autistic people. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 65(4), 1607–1609. https://doi.org/10.1044/2022_JSLHR-21-00660
8.
CarterE. W.AsmusJ.MossC. K.CooneyM.WeirK.VincentL.BornT.HochmanJ. M.Bottema-BeutelK.FespermanE. (2013). Peer network strategies to foster social connections among adolescents with and without severe disabilities. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 46(2), 51–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/004005991304600206
9.
CarterE. W.Dykstra SteinbrennerJ. R.HallL. J. (2019). Exploring feasibility and fit: Peer-mediated interventions for high school students with autism spectrum disorders. School Psychology Review, 48(2), 157–169. https://doi.org/10.17105/SPR-2017-0112.V48-2
10.
CarterE. W.TuttleM.AsmusJ. M.MossC. K.LloydB. P. (2023). Observations of students with and without severe disabilities in general education classes: A portrait of inclusion?Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 39(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/10883576231178268
11.
ChangY. C.LockeJ. (2016). A systematic review of peer-mediated interventions for children with autism spectrum disorder. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 27, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2016.03.010
12.
ChenM.PustejovskyJ. E.KlingbeilD. A.Van NormanE. R. (2023). Between-case standardized mean differences: Flexible methods for single-case designs. Journal of School Psychology, 98, 16–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2023.02.002
13.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum.
14.
CooperH. (2016). Research synthesis and meta-analysis: A step-by-step approach (Vol. 2). SAGE.
15.
CoyneM. D.CookB. G.TherrienW. J. (2016). Recommendations for replication research in special education: A framework of systematic, conceptual replications. Remedial and Special Education, 37(4), 244–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932516648463
16.
CresswellL.HinchR.CageE. (2019). The experiences of peer relationships amongst autistic adolescents: A systematic review of the qualitative evidence. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 61, 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2019.01.003
17.
DrevonD.FursaS. R.MalcolmA. L. (2017). Intercoder reliability and validity of WebPlotDigitizer in extracting graphed data. Behavior Modification, 41(2), 323–339. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445516673998
18.
EzzamelN.BondC. (2016). How have target pupil, peer and school level outcomes related to peer-mediated interventions for pupils with ASD been evaluated?European Journal of Special Needs Education, 31(4), 440–457. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2016.1194568
19.
FlemingJ. I.VanUitertV.WilsonS. E.CooB. G. (2025). Evaluating a peer education intervention for autistic middle-school students and their peers. EdArXiv. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/NPH7V
20.
HedgesL. V. (1981). Distribution theory for Glass’s estimator of effect size and related estimators. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 6(2), 107–128. https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986006002107
21.
HedgesL. V.PustejovskyJ. E.ShadishW. R. (2013). A standardized mean difference effect size for multiple baseline designs across individuals. Research Synthesis Methods, 4(4), 324–341. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1086
22.
HillC. J.BloomH. S.BlackA. R.LipseyM. W. (2008). Empirical benchmarks for interpreting effect sizes in research. Child Development Perspectives, 2(3), 172–177. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2008.00061.x
23.
HughesC.GolasM.CosgriffJ.BrighamN.EdwardsC.CashenK. (2011). Effects of a social skills intervention among high school students with intellectual disabilities and autism and their general education peers. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 36(1–2), 46–61. https://doi.org/10.2511/rpsd.36.1-2.46
24.
HughesC.KaplanL.BernsteinR.BoykinM.ReillyC.BrighamN.CosgriffJ.HeilingoetterJ.HarveyM. (2012). Increasing social interaction skills of secondary school students with autism and/or intellectual disability: A review of interventions. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 37(4), 288–307. https://doi.org/10.2511/027494813805327214
25.
LedfordJ. R.GastD. L. (Eds.). (2018). Single case research methodology. Routledge.
26.
LemonsC. J.FuchsD.GilbertJ. K.FuchsL. S. (2014). Evidence-based practices in a changing world: Reconsidering the counterfactual in education research. Educational Researcher, 43(5), 242–252. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X14539189
27.
Lockwood EstrinG.MilnerV.SpainD.HappéF.ColvertE. (2021). Barriers to autism spectrum disorder diagnosis for young women and girls: A systematic review. Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 8(4), 454–470. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40489-020-00225-8
Ne’emanA. (2021). When disability is defined by behavior, outcome measures should not promote “passing.”AMA Journal of Ethics, 23(7), E569–E575. https://doi.org/10.1001/amajethics.2021.569
30.
OdomS. L. (2019). Peer-based interventions for children and youth with autism spectrum disorder: History and effects. School Psychology Review, 48(2), 170–176. https://doi.org/10.17105/SPR-2019-0019.V48-2
31.
OdomS. L.HoysonM.JamiesonB.StrainP. S. (1985). Increasing handicapped preschoolers’ peer social interactions: Cross-setting and component analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1985.18-3
RossettiZ. (2024). “Not sure how to approach them the right way”: Nondisabled students’ perspectives on friendship with peers with I/DD. Remedial and Special Education, 46(1), 66–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325231221215
38.
SchaeferJ. M.Cannella-MaloneH. I.CarterE. W. (2016). The place of peers in peer-mediated interventions for students with intellectual disability. Remedial and Special Education, 37(6), 345–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932516629220
39.
ScorgieK.ForlinC. (Eds.). (2019). Promoting social inclusion: Co-creating environments that foster equity and belonging. Emerald Group Publishing.
40.
SedgewickF.HillV.PellicanoE. (2019). It’s different for girls: Gender differences in the friendships and conflict of autistic and neurotypical adolescents. Autism, 23(5), 1119–1132. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361318794930
41.
ShadishW. R.HedgesL. V.HornerR. H.OdomS. L. (2015). The role of between-case effect size in conducting, interpreting, and summarizing single-case research (NCER 2015-002). National Center for Education Research.
42.
ShadishW. R.HedgesL. V.PustejovskyJ. E. (2014). Analysis and meta-analysis of single-case designs with a standardized mean difference statistic: A primer and applications. Journal of School Psychology, 52(2), 123–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2013.11.005
43.
SteinbrennerJ. R.HumeK.OdomS. L.MorinK. L.NowellS. W.TomaszewskiB.SzendreyS.McIntyreN. S.Yücesoy-ÖzkanS.SavageM. N. (2020). Evidence-based practices for children, youth, and young adults with Autism. The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute, National Clearinghouse on Autism Evidence and Practice Review Team.
44.
TraversH. E.CarterE. W. (2021). A systematic review of how peer-mediated interventions impact students without disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 43(1), 40–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932521989414
45.
ViechtbauerW. (2010). Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. Journal of Statistical Software, 36(3), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v036.i03
46.
WatkinsL.O’ReillyM.KuhnM.GevarterC.LancioniG. E.SigafoosJ.LangR. (2015). A review of peer-mediated social interaction interventions for students with autism in inclusive settings. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45(4), 1070–1083. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-014-2264-x
47.
WelshM.ParkeR. D.WidamanK.O’NeilR. (2001). Linkages between children’s social and academic competence: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of School Psychology, 39(6), 463–481. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4405(01)00084-X
48.
WestE. A.TraversJ. C.KemperT. D.LibertyL. M.CoteD. L.McCollowM. M.Stansberry BrusnahanL. L. (2016). Racial and ethnic diversity of participants in research supporting evidence-based practices for learners with autism spectrum disorder. The Journal of Special Education, 50(3), 151–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466916632495
49.
WongC.OdomS. L.HumeK. A.CoxA. W.FettigA.KucharczykS.BrockM. E.PlavnickJ. B.FleuryV. P.SchultzT. R. (2015). Evidence-based practices for children, youth, and young adults with autism spectrum disorder: A comprehensive review. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45, 1951–1966. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-014-2351-z
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
