The present study evaluated the effectiveness of point-of-view video self-prompting (VSP), with narration, delivered via an iPad, in teaching four secondary students with high-incidence disabilities to solve algebraic equations requiring the use of the distributive property. Participants were taught to independently use an iPad to self-deliver video prompts of each of 30 steps required to solve the algebraic equations. A multiple probe across participants design was used to evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention. Dependent measures included the percentage of steps correct and the percentage of problems correct on novel problems during baseline, pre-VSP session probes, and maintenance and generalization probes. Three of four participants’ data evidenced a functional relation between the VSP intervention and solving the targeted algebraic equations. Participants’ skills maintained to varying degrees. In addition, participants’ skills generalized to a similar but untaught equation type. Limitations and implications for future research and practice are discussed.
BereznakS.AyresK. M.MechlingL. C.AlexanderJ. L. (2012). Video self-prompting and mobile technology to increase daily living and vocational independence for students with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 24(3), 269–285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-012-9270-8
2.
BurtonC. E.AndersonD. H.PraterM. A.DychesT. T. (2013). Video self-modeling on an iPad to teach functional math skills to adolescents with autism and intellectual disability. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 28(2), 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357613478829
3.
Cannella-MaloneH. I.BrooksD. G.TullisC. A. (2013). Using self-directed video prompting to teach students with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Behavioral Education, 22(3), 169–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-013-9175-3
4.
CanobiK. H. (2009). Concept-procedure interactions in children’s addition and subtraction. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 102, 131–149. https://doi10.1016/j.jecp.2008.07.008
5.
CihakD. F. (2009). Using video modeling via handheld computers to improve geometry skills for high school students with learning disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 24(4), 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264340902400402
DuekerS. A.Cannella-MaloneH. I. (2019). Teaching addition to students with moderate disabilities using video prompting. The Journal of Special Education Apprenticeship, 8(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.58729/2167-3454.1087
8.
EdwardsN. M.LambrosK. M. (2018). Video self-modeling as a reading fluency intervention for dual language learners with disabilities. Contemporary School Psychology, 22(4), 468–478. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-018-0207-9
9.
GageN. A.LierheimerK. S.GoranL. G. (2012). Characteristics of students with high-incidence disabilities broadly defined. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 23(3), 168–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/1044207311425385
10.
GoldmanS. R. (1989). Strategy instruction in mathematics. Learning Disability Quarterly, 12(1), 43–55. https://doi.org/10.2307/1510251
11.
GoodwynF. D.HattonH. L.VannestK. J.GanzJ. B. (2013). Video modeling and video feedback interventions for students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Beyond Behavior, 22(2), 14–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/107429561302200204
12.
HarrisG. M.LittleS. G.Akin-LittleA. (2017). Video self-modelling as an intervention for remediating dysgraphia in children with autism spectrum disorders. Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties, 22(2), 153–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/19404158.2017.1397525
13.
HornerR. D.BaerD. M. (1978). Multiple-probe technique: A variation on the multiple baseline. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 189–196. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1978.11-189
14.
JowettE. L.MooreD. W.AndersonA. (2012). Using an iPad-based video modelling package to teach numeracy skills to a child with an autism spectrum disorder. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 15(4), 304–312. https://doi.org/10.3109/17518423.2012.682168
15.
KagoharaD. M.SigafoosJ.AchmadiD.O’ReillyM.LancioniG. (2012). Teaching children with autism spectrum disorders to check the spelling of words. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 6(1), 304–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2011.05.012
16.
KaufmanA. S.KaufmanN. L. (2004). The Kaufman Test of Educational Achievement (2nd ed.). AGS Publishing.
17.
KellemsR. O.EdwardsS. (2016). Using video modeling and video prompting to teach core academic content to students with learning disabilities. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 60(3), 207–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988x.2015.1067875
18.
KellemsR. O.FrandsenK.HansenB.GabrielsenT.ClarkeB.SimonsK.ClementsK. (2016). Teaching multi-step math skills to adults with disabilities via video prompting. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 58, 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2016.08.013
19.
KnightV. F.KuntzE. M.BrownM. (2018). Paraprofessional-delivered video prompting to teach academics to students with severe disabilities in inclusive settings. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 48(6), 2203–2216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-018-3476-2
20.
LedfordJ. R.LambertJ. M.PustejovskyJ. E.ZimmermanK. N.HollinsN.BartonE. E. (2023). Single-case-design research in special education: Next-generation guidelines and considerations. Exceptional Children, 89(4), 379–396. https://doi.org/10.1177/00144029221137656
21.
LeeJ.BryantD. P.OkM. W.ShinM. (2020). A systematic review of interventions for algebraic concepts and skills of secondary students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 35(2), 89–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12217
22.
LombardiA.GauJ.DorenB.LindstromL. (2013). The influence of instructional setting of common core subjects on postsecondary participation. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 24, 170–180. https://doi:10.1177/1044207312468766
23.
MazzottiV. L.RoweD. A.SinclairJ.PoppenM.WoodsW. E.ShearerM. L. (2016). Predictors of post-school success: A systematic review of NLTS2 secondary analyses. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 39(4), 196–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143415588047
24.
MechlingL. C.GastD. L.FieldsE. A. (2008). Evaluation of a portable DVD player and system of least prompts to self-prompt cooking task completion by young adults with moderate intellectual disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 42(3), 179–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466907313348
25.
MillerK. M.LittleM. E. (2018). Examining the effects of SRSD in combination with video self-modeling on writing by third grade students with learning disabilities. Exceptionality, 26(2), 81–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2017.1283622
26.
MorrisJ. R.HughesE. M.StockerJ. D.DavisE. S. (2022). Using video modeling, explicit instruction, and augmented reality to teach math to students with disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 45(4), 306–319. https://doi.org/10.1177/07319487211040470
27.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2014). Principles to actions: Ensuring mathematical success for all.
28.
ParkJ.BouckE.DuenasA. (2019). The effect of video modeling and video prompting interventions on individuals with intellectual disability: A systematic literature review. Journal of Special Education Technology, 34(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643418780464
29.
PayneD. O.Cannella-MaloneH. I.TullisC. A.SabielnyL. (2012). The effects of self-directed video prompting on the completion of daily living skills for students with moderate to severe intellectual and developmental disabilities. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 24, 617–634. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-012-9293-1
30.
Rittle-JohnsonB.SchneiderM.StarJ. R. (2015). Not a one-way street: Bidirectional relations between procedural and conceptual knowledge of mathematics. Educational Psychology Review, 27, 587–597. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9302-x
31.
SatsangiR.HammerR.HoganC. D. (2019). Video modeling and explicit instruction: A comparison of strategies for teaching math to students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 34(1), 35–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12189
32.
SaundersA. F.SpoonerF.Ley DavisL. (2018). Using video prompting to teach mathematical problem solving of real-world video-simulation problems. Remedial and Special Education, 39(1), 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932517717042
33.
SchrankF. A. (2011). Woodcock-Johnson III tests of cognitive abilities. In DavisA. S. (Ed.), Handbook of pediatric neuropsychology (pp. 415–434). Springer Publishing Company.
34.
SchunkD. H.HansonA. R. (1985). Peer models: Influence on children’s self-efficacy and achievement. Journal of Education & Psychology, 77, 313–322. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.77.3.313
35.
Shipley-BenamouR.LutzkerJ. R.TaubmanM. (2002). Teaching daily living skills to children with autism through instructional video modeling. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 4, 165–176. https://doi.org/10.1177/10983007020040030501=
36.
SmithM.AyresK.MechlingL.SmithK. (2013). Comparison of the effects of video modeling with narration vs. video modeling on the functional skill acquisition of adolescents with autism. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 48(2), 164–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143413511981
37.
StricklandT. K.MacciniP. (2013). The effects of the concrete–representational–abstract integration strategy on the ability of students with learning disabilities to multiply linear expressions within area problems. Remedial and Special Education, 34(3), 142–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932512441712
38.
VukovicR. K.SiegelL. S. (2010). Academic and cognitive characteristics of persistent math difficulty from first through fourth grade. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 25(1), 25–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2009.00298.x
39.
WechslerD. (2009). Wechsler Individual Achievement Test (3rd ed.). Pearson.
40.
WengP. L.BouckE. C. (2014). Using video prompting via iPads to teach price comparison to adolescents with autism. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 8(10), 1405–1415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2014.06.014
41.
WuS.GadkeD. L.StrattonK. K. (2018). Using video self-modeling as a small group reading fluency intervention for elementary school students. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 34(4), 297–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377903.2018.1443984
42.
YakubovaG.HughesE. M.HornbergerE. (2015). Video-based intervention in teaching fraction problem-solving to students with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45(9), 2865–2875. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-015-2449-y
43.
YakubovaG.HughesE. M.ShinaberryM. (2016). Learning with technology: Video modeling with concrete–representational–abstract sequencing for students with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 7(46), 2349–2362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-016-2768-7
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
