Special educator shortages have threatened the provision of services U.S. to students with disabilities since the passage of the Education for All Handicapped Children Act in 1975, since reauthorized as the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. We conducted a systematic review of studies that used administrative data to study the special educator workforce. We identified 12 studies addressing policies or practices related to the composition, distribution, or effectiveness of the special educator workforce. Together, these studies provide emerging evidence regarding policies and practices that could support the special educator workforce. We recommend that future special educator-focused research with administrative data address the composition, distribution, and effectiveness of the workforce in tandem, better attend to heterogeneity, and move from descriptive studies to studies evaluating the outcomes of specific policies.
BettiniE.GilmourA. F.WilliamsT. O.BillingsleyB. (2020). Predicting special and general educators’ intent to continue teaching using conservation of resources theory. Exceptional Children, 86(3), 310–329. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402919870464
3.
BettiniE.ParkY.BenedictA.KimerlingJ.LeiteW. (2016). Situating special educators’ instructional qualities and their students’ outcomes within the conditions shaping their work. Exceptionality, 24(3), 176–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2015.1107831
4.
BettiniE.ScottL. A.MeyerK. M.MathewsH. M.ShaheenT. (2023). Challenges facing the special education teacher workforce: Composition, distribution, and effectiveness. In KauffmanJ.HallahanD.PullenP. (Eds.), Handbook of special education (3rd ed.).
5.
BoeE. E.CookL. H.SunderlandR. J. (2008). Teacher turnover: Examining exit attrition, teaching area transfer, and school migration. Exceptional Children, 75(1), 7–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290807500101
6.
BoeE. E.ShinS.CookL. H. (2007). Does teacher preparation matter for beginning teachers in either general or special education?The Journal of Special Education, 41(3), 158–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224669070410030201
7.
BradshawC. P.PasE. T.GoldweberA.RosenbergM. S.LeafP. J. (2012). Integrating school-wide positive behavioral interventions and supports with tier 2 coaching to student support teams: The PBIS model. Advances in School Mental Health Promotion, 5(3), 177–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/1754730X.2012.707429
8.
BrockM. E.CarterE. W. (2017). A meta-analysis of educator training to improve implementation of interventions for students with disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 38(3), 131–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932516653477
9.
Carver-ThomasD.Darling-HammondL. (2017). Teacher turnover: Why it matters and what we can do about it. Learning Policy Institute.
10.
CollingsG. D. (1999). A statewide snapshot of the potential for the preparation of educators and administrators in special education. Contemporary Education, 70(3), 46.
11.
ConleyS.YouS. (2015). Key influences on special education teachers’ intentions to leave: The effects of administrative support and teacher team efficacy in a mediational model. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 45(3), 521–540. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143215608859
12.
ConnellyV.GrahamS. (2009). Student teaching and teacher attrition in special education. Teacher Education and Special Education, 32(3), 257–269. https://doi.org/bbg5sz
13.
*CoocN.YangM. (2016). Diversity and equity in the distribution of teachers with special education credentials: Trends from California. AERA Open, 2(4), 1–15. https://doi.org/gcd5z4
14.
CummingM. M.BettiniE.ChowJ. C. (2023). High-quality systematic literature reviews in special education: Promoting coherence, contextualization, generativity, and transparency. Exceptional Children, 89(4), 412–431. https://doi.org/grm7cz
15.
DeAngelisK. J.PresleyJ. B. (2011). Toward a more nuanced understanding of new teacher attrition. Education and Urban Society, 43(5), 598–626. https://doi.org/ddwhn8
16.
EdgarE.PairA. (2005). Special education teacher attrition: It all depends on where you are standing. Teacher Education and Special Education, 28(3), 163–170. https://doi.org/d6qm93
FengL. (2010). Hire today, gone tomorrow: New teacher classroom assignments and teacher mobility. Education Finance and Policy, 5(3), 278–316. https://doi.org/ctsfmr
19.
*FengL.SassT. R. (2013). What makes special-education teachers special? Teacher training and achievement of students with disabilities. Economics of Education Review, 36, 122–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2013.06.006
20.
*FengL.SassT. R. (2018). The impact of incentives to recruit and retain teachers in “hard-to-staff” subjects. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 37(1), 112–135. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.22037
21.
GageN. A.AdamsonR.MacSuga-GageA. S.LewisT. J. (2017). The relationship between the academic achievement of students with emotional and behavioral disorders and teacher characteristics. Behavioral Disorders, 43(1), 213–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/0198742917713211
22.
*GilmourA. F. (2020). Teacher certification area and the academic outcomes of students with learning disabilities or emotional/behavioral disorders. The Journal of Special Education, 54(1), 40–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466919849905
23.
*GilmourA. F. (In press). Teaching quality: An unexamined element of special education teacher turnover. Journal of Education Human Resources.
24.
GilmourA. F.HenryG. T. (2018). A comparison of the teacher quality of late elementary and middle school students with disabilities to the teacher quality of their peers without disabilities in math. The Elementary School Journal, 118(3), 426–451. https://doi.org/10.1086/696140
25.
GilmourA. F.HenryG. T. (2020). Who are the classmates of students with disabilities in elementary mathematics classrooms?Remedial and Special Education, 41(1), 18–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932518789493
26.
GilmourA. F.NeugebauerS. R.SandilosL. E. (2022). Moderators of the association between teaching students with disabilities and general education teacher turnover. Exceptional Children, 88(4), 401–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/00144029221081239
27.
GilmourA. F.NguyenT. D.ReddingC.BettiniE. (2023). The shifting context of special education teachers’ work and its relationship with retention. Remedial and Special Education, 44(3), 171–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325221113016
28.
*GilmourA. F.WehbyJ. H. (2020). The association between teaching students with disabilities and teacher turnover. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(5), 1042–1060. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000394
29.
GoldhaberD.FalkenG.TheobaldR. (2024). What do teacher job postings tell us about school hiring needs and equity? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.3102/016237372412465
30.
GoldhaberD.KriegJ.TheobaldR.GogginsM. (2022). Front end to back end: Teacher preparation, workforce entry, and attrition. Journal of Teacher Education, 73(3), 253–273. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487121103030
31.
*GoldmanS. E.GilmourA. F. (2021). Educating students with autism spectrum disorders: Is teacher certification area associated with academic outcomes?Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 51, 550–563. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-020-04561-w
32.
GoldringR.TaieS.RiddlesM. (2014). Teacher attrition and mobility: Results from the 2012-13 teacher follow-up survey. National Center for Education Statistics.
33.
GriffinC. C. (2010). A summary of research for educational leaders on the induction of beginning special educators. Journal of Special Education Leadership, 23(1), 14–20.
34.
IngersollR. M. (2001). Teacher turnover and teacher shortages: An organizational analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 38(3), 499–534. https://doi.org/bhnzss
35.
KirkseyJ. J.LloydhauserM. (2022). Dual certification in special and elementary education and associated benefits for students with disabilities and their teachers. AERA Open, 8, 233285842110710. https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584211071096
LaiI.WoodW. J.ImbermanS. A.JonesN. D.StrunkK. O. (2021). Teacher quality gaps by disability and socioeconomic status: Evidence from Los Angeles. Educational Researcher, 50(2), 74–85. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X20955170
38.
MaheadyL.JabotM.ReyJ.Michielli-PendlJ. (2007). An early field-based experience and its impact on pre-service candidates’ teaching practices and their pupils’ outcomes. Teacher Education and Special Education, 30(1), 24–33. https://doi.org/b7rs93
39.
Mason-WilliamsL. (2015). Unequal opportunities: A profile of the distribution of special education teachers. Exceptional Children, 81(2), 247–262. https://doi.org/f6xrzj
40.
Mason-WilliamsL.BettiniE.GagnonJ. C. (2017). Access to qualified special educators across elementary neigh-borhood and exclusionary schools. Remedial and Special Education, 38(5), 297–307. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932517713311
NguyenT. D.BettiniE.ReddingC.GilmourA. F. (2024). Comparing teacher turnover intentions to actual turnover: Cautions and lessons for the field. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737241249459
ReddingC. (2019). A teacher like me: A review of the effect of student–teacher racial/ethnic matching on teacher perceptions of students and student academic and behavioral outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 89(4), 499–535. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654319853545
45.
RethlefsenM. L.KirtleyS.WaffenschmidtS.AyalaA. P.MoherD.PageM. J.KoffelJ. B., & PRISMA-S Group. (2021). PRISMA-S: An extension to the PRISMA statement for reporting literature searches in systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews, 10, 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-01542-z
46.
RiveraE. A.McMahonS. D.KeysC. B. (2014). Collaborative teaching: School implementation and connections with outcomes among students with disabilities. Journal of Prevention and Intervention in the Community, 42(1), 72–85. https://doi.org/k8xk
47.
*RobertsonJ. S.SingletonJ. D. (2010). Comparison of traditional versus alternative preparation of special education teachers. Teacher Education and Special Education, 33(3), 213–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406409359904
48.
ScottL. A. (2017). Experience of Black male special education teachers: Are alternative licensure programs the desired route for recruitment and preparation?Education and Urban Society, 51(3), 332–350. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124517719971
49.
SingerJ. D. (1992). Are special educators’ career paths special? Results from a 13-year longitudinal study. Exceptional Children, 59(3), 262–279. https://doi.org/ghtpb8
50.
TheobaldR. J.GoldhaberD. D.GratzT. M.HoldenK. L. (2021). High school English language arts teachers and postsecondary outcomes for students with and without disabilities. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 31(4), 217–229. https://doi.org/kmdb
51.
*TheobaldR. J.GoldhaberD. D.HoldenK. L.SteinM. L. (2022). Special education teacher preparation, literacy instructional alignment, and reading achievement for students with high-incidence disabilities. Exceptional Children, 88(4), 381–400. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440292210812
52.
*TheobaldR. J.GoldhaberD. D.NaitoN.SteinM. L. (2021). The special education teacher pipeline: Teacher preparation, workforce entry, and retention. Exceptional Children, 88(1), 65–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/00144029211010162
VianoS.BakerD. J. (2020). How administrative data collection and analysis can better reflect racial and ethnic identities. Review of Research in Education, 44(1), 301–331. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X20903321
55.
*WojcikA. J.HicksM.ScottL. A.ThomaC. A.BowmanR. W.FrazierR. (2023). A comparison of service time and racial categories within traditional and alternative route internship programs for special education licensure. Teacher Education and Special Education, 46(2), 162–177. https://doi.org/10.1177/08884064221119166
56.
WoodW. J.LaiI.FilosaN. R.ImbermanS. A.JonesN. D.StrunkK. O. (2022). Are effective teachers for students with disabilities effective teachers for all? (Working Paper No. 268-0622). National Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
