Shifts in special education over the last 25 years have increased the pressure on special education teacher preparation programs to improve the quality of opportunities to learn provided to teacher candidates. One aspect of quality that has not been extensively explored in the literature is the interaction between the individual candidate—the learner—and preparation experiences. Using survey and interview data from special education teacher candidates across six teacher preparation programs, we explore how candidates with differing levels of teacher self-efficacy (TSE) experience preparation. Findings suggest that TSE shaped how candidates made sense of preparation and what they took up from their opportunities to learn. Across phases, candidates with low- and high-TSE differed in how they reported on their learning opportunities and then how they interpreted these opportunities as shaping their future practice. We end with implications for research, policy, and practice in special education teacher preparation.
AllinderR. M. (1994). The relationship between efficacy and the instructional practices of special education teachers and consultants. Teacher Education and Special Education, 17, 86–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/088840649401700203
2.
BanduraA. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman.
3.
BenedictA.HoldheideL.BrownellM. T.FoleyA. M. (2016). Learning to teach: Practice-based preparation in teacher education. Collaboration for Effective Educator Development, Accountability and Reform (CEEDAR).
4.
BerlinR.YoungsP.CohenJ. (2021). How elementary teaching candidates’ learning opportunities are associated with their knowledge, self-efficacy, and beliefs. Teachers College Record, 123(7), 1–30.
5.
BettiniE.Morris-MathewsH.LillisJ.MeyerK.ShaheenT.KalerL.BrunstingN. C. (2021). Special educators’ roles in inclusive schools. Invited chapter for McLeskeyJ.SpoonerF.AlgozzineB.WaldronN. L. (Eds.), Handbook of effective, inclusive elementary schools: Research and practice (pp. 43–76). Routledge.
6.
BillingsleyB.BettiniE.WilliamsT. O. (2019). Teacher diversity in special and general education: Composition and distribution of teachers of color across schools. Remedial and Special Education, 40, 199–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932517733047
7.
BishopA. G.BrownellM. T.KlingnerJ. K.LekoM. M.GalmanS. A. (2010). Differences in beginning special education teachers: The influence of personal attributes, preparation, and school environment on classroom reading practices. Learning Disability Quarterly, 33, 75–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/073194871003300202
8.
BoeE. E.ShinS.CookL. H. (2007). Does teacher preparation matter for beginning teachers in either special or general education?Journal of Special Education, 41, 158–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224669070410030201
9.
BovedaM.AronsonB. A. (2019). Special education preservice teachers, intersectional diversity, and the privileging of emerging professional identities. Remedial and Special Education, 40, 248–260. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932519838621
10.
BoydD. J.GrossmanP. L.LankfordH.LoebS.WyckoffJ. (2009). Teacher preparation and student achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 31, 416–440.
11.
BrantlingerE.JimenezR.KlingnerJ.PugachM.RichardsonV. (2005). Qualitative studies in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 195–207.
12.
BrownellM. T.SindelarP. T.KielyM. T.DanielsonL. C. (2010). Special education teacher quality and preparation: Exposing foundations, constructing a new model. Exceptional Children, 76, 357–377.
13.
CantrellS. C.HughesH. (2008). Teacher efficacy and content literacy implementation: An exploration of the effects of extended professional development with coaching. Journal of Literacy Research, 40, 95–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/10862960802070442
14.
CohenJ.BerlinR. (2020). What constitutes an “opportunity to learn” in teacher preparation?Journal of Teacher Education, 71, 434–448. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487119879893
15.
Council for Exceptional Children. (2015). What every special educator must know: Professional ethics and standards. Author.
16.
CrottyM. (1998). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. Sage.
17.
DawsonH.ScottL. (2013). Teaching students with disabilities efficacy scale: Development and validation. Inclusion, 1(3), 181–196. https://doi.org/10.1352/2326-6988-1.3.181
18.
DunnO. J. (1964). Multiple comparisons using rank sums. Technometrics, 6, 241–252.
19.
Endrew F. v. Douglas County School District, 137 S.Ct. 988 (2017).
20.
Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015, Pub. L. No. 114-95 § 114 Stat. 1177 (2015-2016).
21.
FengL.SassT. R. (2013). What makes special-education teachers special? Teacher training and achievement of students with disabilities. Economics of Education Review, 36, 122–134. https://doi.org/10.1037/e721902011-001
22.
GoldhaberD.KriegJ.TheobaldR. (2020). Effective like me? Does having a more productive mentor improve the productivity of mentees?Labour Economics, 63, 101792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2019.101792
23.
GuoY.McDonald ConnorC.YangY.RoehringA. D.MorrisonF. J. (2012). The effects of teacher qualification, teacher self-efficacy, and classroom practices on fifth graders’ literacy outcomes. Elementary School Journal, 113, 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1086/665816
24.
HornI. S.NolenS. B.WardC.CampbellS. S. (2008). Developing practice in multiple worlds: The role of identity in learning to teach. Teacher Education Quarterly, 35(3), 61–72.
JonesN. D.BettiniE. A.BrownellM. T. (2019). Competing strands of educational reform policy: Can collaborative school reform and teacher evaluation reform be reconciled?The Elementary School Journal, 119, 468–486. https://doi.org/10.1086/701706
27.
JonesN. D.YoungsP.FrankK. A. (2013). The role of school-based colleagues in shaping the commitment of novice special and general education teachers. Exceptional Children, 79, 365–383.
28.
JordanA.StanovichP. (2003). Teachers’ personal epistemological beliefs about students with disabilities as indicators of effective teaching practices. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 3, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-3802.2003.00184.x
29.
KlopferK.ScottK.JenkinsJ.DucharmeJ. (2019). Effect of preservice classroom management training on attitudes and skills for teaching children with emotional and behavioral problems. Teacher Education and Special Education, 42, 49–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406417735877
30.
LauterbachA. A.BettiniE.Morris MathewsH.RossettiZ.HughesO. E. (2022). Beyond exploratory: How varied qualitative methodologies can inform and advance the field of special education. In TherrienB.LeeD.MagginD. (Eds.) Special Education Handbook Vol. 2: Methods, Design, and Analysis in Special Education Research.
31.
LekoM. M.BrownellM. T. (2011). Special education preservice teachers’ appropriation of pedagogical tools for teaching reading. Exceptional Children, 77, 229–251. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440291107700205
32.
LeyserY.ZeigerT.RomiS. (2011). Changes in self-efficacy of prospective special and general education teachers: Implication for inclusive education. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 58, 241–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/1034912x.2011.598397
33.
LiL.RupparA. (2020). Conceptualizing teacher agency for inclusive education: A systematic and international review. Teacher Education and Special Education, 44, 42–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406420926976
34.
LincolnY. A.LynhamS. A.GubaE. G. (2011). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences, revisited. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. K. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (pp. 97–128). SAGE.
35.
MathewsH. M. (2018). Examining opportunities to learn in special education teacher preparation [Doctoral Dissertation, University of Virginia].
36.
MathewsH. M.RodgersW. J.YoungsP. A. (2017). Sense-making for beginning special educators: A systematic mixed studies review. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67(1), 23–36.
37.
McLaughlinM. J. (2010). Evolving interpretations of educational equity and students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 76, 265–278. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440291007600302
38.
McLeskeyJ.BarringerM.-D.BillingsleyB.BrownellM.JacksonD.KennedyM.LewisT.MaheadyL.RodriguezJ.ScheelerM. C.WinnJ.ZieglerD. (2017, January). High-leverage practices in special education. Council for Exceptional Children & CEEDAR Center.
39.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M.SaldanaJ. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE.
40.
NougaretA.ScruggsT.MastropieriM. (2005). Does teacher education produce better special education teachers?Exceptional Children, 71, 217–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290507100301
41.
OnwuegbuzieA. J.CollinsK. M. T. (2007). A typology of mixed methods sampling designs in social science research. The Qualitative Report, 12, 281–316.
42.
PattonM. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Sage.
43.
RonfeldtM.BrockmanS. L.CampbellS. L. (2018). Does cooperating teachers’ instructional effectiveness improve preservice teachers’ future performance?Educational Researcher, 47, 405–418. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2007.1638
44.
Rubie-DavisC. (2007). Classroom interactions: Exploring the practices of high- and low-expectations teachers. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 289–306.
45.
RupparA. L.RobertsC. A.OlsonA. J. (2017). Perceptions about expert teaching for students with severe disabilities among teachers identified as experts. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 42, 121–135. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796917697311
46.
SayeskiK. L.BatemanD. F.YellM. L (2019). Rev-envisioning teacher preparation in an era of Endrew F.: Instruction over access. Intervention in School and Clinic, 54(5), 264–271.
47.
SchmidtW. H.CoganL.HouangR. (2011). The role of opportunity to learn in teacher preparation: An international context. Journal of Teacher Education, 62, 138–153.
48.
TeddlieC.TashakkoriA. (Eds.). (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. SAGE.
49.
TheobaldR.GoldhaberD.HoldenK.SteinM. (2021). Special education teacher preparation, literacy instructional alignment, and reading achievement for students with high-incidence disabilities (Working Paper No. 253-0621). National Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research (CALDER).
50.
TrainorA. A.GraueE. (2014). Evaluating rigor in qualitative methodology and research dissemination. Remedial and Special Education, 35, 267–274. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932514528100
UrbachJ.MooreB. A.KlingnerJ. K.GalmanS.HaagerD.BrownellM. T.DingleM. (2015). “That’s my job”: Comparing the beliefs of more and less accomplished special educators related to their roles and responsibilities. Teacher Education and Special Education, 38, 323–336. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406415591220
53.
WindschitlM.ThompsonJ.BraatenM. (2011). Ambitious pedagogy by novice teachers: Who benefits from tool-supported collaborative inquiry into practice and why?Teachers College Record, 113, 1311–1360.
54.
YoungsP.JonesN.LowM. (2011). How beginning special and general education elementary teachers negotiate role expectations and access professional resources. Teachers College Record, 113(7), 1506–1540.
55.
ZeeM.KoomenH. M. (2016). Teacher self-efficacy and its effects on classroom processes, student academic adjustment, and teacher well-being: A synthesis of 40 years of research. Review of Educational Research, 86, 981–1015.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
