Using data extracted from the Parent and Family Involvement in Education Survey of the 2019 National Household Education Surveys Program, this study used a series of linear probability models to examine the association between family–school relationships and exclusionary discipline. The sample included 15,360 U.S. families of K–12 non-homeschooled and non-virtual school students. Results suggest that students with disabilities experienced significantly more expulsion and suspension and that their families were less satisfied with school and received significantly more individual contact from school for negative reasons. In addition, parent satisfaction with school and individual contacts from school to parent regarding positive behaviors or schoolwork and behavior problems were statistically significantly associated with exclusionary discipline after accounting for student characteristics, such as race, age, and gender. These associations between family–school relationships and exclusionary discipline did not differ by a student’s disability status.
AnZ. G.HornE. (2022). Through the lens of early educators: Understanding the use of expulsion and suspension in childcare programs. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 60(3), 379–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2022.03.008
2.
AnZ. G.HornE.CheathamG. A. (2019). Coaching to build parent competency in addressing early challenging behaviors. Young Exceptional Children, 22(4), 198–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/1096250618759941
3.
BakerT. L.WiseJ.KelleyG.SkibaR. J. (2016). Identifying barriers: Creating solutions to improve family engagement. School Community Journal, 26(2), 161–184.
4.
BernardiR. A. (1994). Validating research results when Cronbach’s alpha is below. 70: A methodological procedure. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54(3), 766–775. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164494054003023
5.
Blue-BanningM.SummersJ. A.FranklandH. C.NelsonL. L.BeegleG. (2004). Dimensions of family and professional partnerships: Constructive guidelines for collaboration. Exceptional Children, 70(2), 167–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290407000203
6.
BreenR.KarlsonK. B.HolmA. (2018). Interpreting and understanding logits, probits, and other nonlinear probability models. Annual Review of Sociology, 44, 39–54. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-073117-041429
7.
BronfenbrennerU.MorrisP. A. (2006). The bioecological model of human development. In LernerR. M.DamonW. (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Theoretical models of human development (pp. 793–828). John Wiley & Sons.
8.
BruinJ. (2006). Newtest: Command to compute new test. UCLA: Statistical Consulting Group.
9.
CollinsK. M.ConnorD.FerriB.GallagherD.SamsonJ. F. (2016). Dangerous assumptions and unspoken limitations: A disability studies in education response to Morgan, Farkas, Hillemeier, Mattison, Maczuga, Li, and Cook (2015). Multiple Voices for Ethnically Diverse Exceptional Learners, 16(1), 4–16. https://doi.org/10.56829/2158-396X.16.1.4
10.
DavisJ. E.JordanW. J. (1994). The effects of school context, structure, and experiences on African American males in middle and high schools. Journal of Negro Education, 63(4), 570–587. https://doi.org/10.2307/2967296
EpsteinJ. L.SheldonS. B. (2002). Present and accounted for: Improving student attendance through family and community involvement. The Journal of Educational Research, 95(5), 308–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670209596604
13.
GalindoC.SheldonS. B. (2012). School and home connections and children’s kindergarten achievement gains: The mediating role of family involvement. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 27(1), 90–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2011.05.004
HarryB. (2008). Collaboration with culturally and linguistically diverse families: Ideal versus reality. Exceptional Children, 74(3), 372–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290807400306
16.
HeilbrunA.CornellD.LovegroveP. (2015). Principal attitudes regarding zero tolerance and racial disparities in school suspensions. Psychology in the Schools, 52(5), 489–499. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21838
17.
HooksS. D.NagroS. A.FraserD. W. (2020). Six strategies for effective family-practitioner communication through ACCESS. Young Exceptional Children, 24(2), 96–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/1096250620928330
18.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq (2004).
19.
JeynesW. H. (2016). A meta-analysis: The relationship between parental involvement and African American school outcomes. Journal of Black Studies, 47(3), 195–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021934715623522
20.
KraftM. A.RogersT. (2015). The underutilized potential of teacher-to-parent communication: Evidence from a field experiment. Economics of Education Review, 47, 49–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2015.04.001
21.
LeysC.LeyC.KleinO.BernardP.LicataL. (2013). Detecting outliers: Do not use standard deviation around the mean, use absolute deviation around the median. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(4), 764–766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.03.013
MarchbanksI. I. I. M. P.BlakeJ. J.BoothE. A.CarmichaelD.SeibertA. L.FabeloT. (2015). The economic effects of exclusionary discipline on grade retention and high school dropout. In LosenD. J. (Ed.), Closing the school discipline gap: Equitable remedies for excessive exclusion (pp. 59–74). Teachers College Press.
24.
MarcucciO. (2020). Parental involvement and the Black–White discipline gap: The role of parental social and cultural capital in American schools. Education and Urban Society, 52(1), 143–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124519846283
25.
McElderryC. G.ChengT. C. (2014). Understanding the discipline gap from an ecological perspective. Children & Schools, 36(4), 241–249. https://doi.org/10.1093/cs/cdu020
26.
MoodC. (2010). Logistic regression: Why we cannot do what we think we can do, and what we can do about it. European Sociological Review, 26(1), 67–82. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcp006
27.
MorganE.SalomonN.PlotkinM.CohenR. (2014). The school discipline consensus report: Strategies from the field to keep students engaged in school and out of the juvenile justice system. Council of State Governments Justice Center. https://csgjusticecenter.org/publications/school-discipline/
28.
MorganP. L.FarkasG.HillemeierM. M.WangY.MandelZ.DeJarnettC.MaczugaS. (2019). Are students with disabilities suspended more frequently than otherwise similar students without disabilities?Journal of School Psychology, 72, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2018.11.001
29.
MorrisE. W.PerryB. L. (2016). The punishment gap: School suspension and racial disparities in achievement. Social Problems, 63(1), 68–86. https://doi.org/10.1093/socpro/spv026
30.
NoltemeyerA. L.WardR. M.McloughlinC. (2015). Relationship between school suspension and student outcomes: A meta-analysis. School Psychology Review, 44(2), 224–240. https://doi.org/10.17105/spr-14-0008.1
31.
PowersD.XieY. (2008). Statistical methods for categorical data analysis. Emerald Group Publishing.
32.
SkibaR. J.ChungC. G.TrachokM.BakerT. L.SheyaA.HughesR. L. (2014). Parsing disciplinary disproportionality: Contributions of infraction, student, and school characteristics to out-of-school suspension and expulsion. American Educational Research Journal, 51(4), 640–670. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831214541670
33.
SmithT. E.HolmesS. R.RomeroM. E.SheridanS. M. (2022). Evaluating the effects of family–school engagement interventions on parent–teacher relationships: A meta-analysis. School Mental Health, 14(2), 278–293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12310-022-09510-9
34.
SullivanA. L.Van NormanE. R.KlingbeilD. A. (2014). Exclusionary discipline of students with disabilities: Student and school characteristics predicting suspension. Remedial and Special Education, 35(4), 199–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932513519825
35.
TheriotM. T.CraunS. W.DupperD. R. (2010). Multilevel evaluation of factors predicting school exclusion among middle and high school students. Children and Youth Services Review, 32(1), 13–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2009.06.009
36.
TuckerV.SchwartzI. (2013). Parents’ perspectives of collaboration with school professionals: Barriers and facilitators to successful partnerships in planning for students with ASD. School Mental Health, 5(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12310-012-9102-0
VickersH. S.MinkeK. M. (1995). Exploring parent-teacher relationships: Joining and communication to others. School Psychology Quarterly, 10(2), 133–150. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0088300
40.
VincentC. G.TobinT. J. (2011). An examination of the relationship between implementation of school-wide positive behavior support (SWPBS) and exclusion of students from various ethnic backgrounds with and without disabilities. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 19(4), 217–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063426610377329
41.
WallaceJ. M.Jr.GoodkindS. G.WallaceC. M.BachmanJ. (2008). Racial, ethnic and gender differences in school discipline among American high school students: 1991–2005. Negro Educational Review, 59(1–2), 47–62.
42.
WeissH. B.BouffardS. M.BridglallB. L.GordonE. W. (2009). Reframing family involvement in education: Supporting families to support educational equity. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED523994.pdf
43.
WelshR. O.LittleS. (2018). The school discipline dilemma: A comprehensive review of disparities and alternative approaches. Review of Educational Research, 88(5), 752–794. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318791582
