Growing numbers of students with intellectual disability (ID) have gained access to universities and colleges through the development of inclusive postsecondary education (IPSE) programs. Despite having physical access to college and university campuses and even classroom spaces, navigating access to actual course content remains a challenge for many students and their instructors. Using semi-structured interviews with 10 students with ID at an IPSE program in the northeastern United States, this qualitative study was conducted to examine students’ experiences accessing course content in university courses. We highlight factors that students identified as significant contributors to their ability to access course content and experience success in the courses they took. Findings reveal that the students attribute a positive or negative course experience to course instructors’ relatability and ability to make course content accessible. Students discussed their desire to be viewed as fully matriculated students while receiving support. Implications for practice are provided.
BaconJ.BaglieriS. (2021). Perspectives of students labeled intellectually disabled at college: Using disability studies in education as a lens to contemplate inclusive postsecondary education. Journal of Disability Studies in Education, 2(1), 27–49. https://doi.org/10.1163/25888803-bja10007
2.
BechtK.Roberts-DahmD.MeyerA.GiarrussoD.Still-RichardsonE. (2020). Inclusive postsecondary education programs of study for students with intellectual disability. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 33(1), 63–79.
3.
BergL. A.JirikowicT.HaerlingK.MacDonaldG. (2017). Navigating the hidden curriculum of higher education for postsecondary students with intellectual disabilities. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 71(3), 7103100020p1–7103100020p9. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2017.024703
4.
BrewerR.MovahedazarhoulighS. (2021). Students with intellectual and developmental disabilities in inclusive higher education: Perceptions of stakeholders in a first-year experience. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 25(9), 993–1009. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2019.1597184
5.
BurginE. C.DediegoA. C.GibbonsM. M.CihakD. F. (2017). “Smiling and ready to learn”: A qualitative exploration of university audit classroom instructors’ experience with students with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 30(4), 359–372.
CareyA. C. (2013). The sociopolitical contexts of passing and intellectual disability. In BruneJ. A.WilsonD. J. (Eds.), Disability and passing: Blurring the lines of identity (pp. 142–166). Temple University Press.
8.
CharmazK. (2005). Grounded theory in the 21st century: A qualitative method for advancing social justice research. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (pp. 507–535). Sage.
9.
CharmazK. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage.
10.
ConnorD. J.CavendishW.HallaranA.OlanderL. (2020). “I’m bright enough to do it, even though sometimes I feel I can’t do it”: Perspectives of high school students with learning disabilities about existing supports to achieve graduation. https://dsq-sds.org/index.php/dsq/article/view/6665/5572
11.
CorbinJ.StraussA. (2008). Basics of qualitative research (3rd ed.): Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage.
12.
FisherA. (2008). Faculty perceptions of students with intellectual disabilities in public post secondary education [Online Submission]. Texas A&M University-Commerce.
13.
GibbonsM. M.CihakD. F.MynattB.WilhoitB. E. (2015). Faculty and student attitudes toward postsecondary education for students with intellectual disabilities and autism. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 28(2), 149–162.
14.
GilsonC. B.GushanasC. M.LiY. F.FosterK. (2020). Defining inclusion: Faculty and student attitudes regarding postsecondary education for students with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 58(1), 65–81. https://doi.org/10.1352/1934-9556-58.1.65
15.
GonzalezT. E.Hernandez-SacaD. I.ArtilesA. J. (2017). In search of voice: Theory and methods in K-12 student voice research in the US, 1990–2010. Educational Review, 69, 451–473. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2016.1231661
16.
GoodeD. A. (1992). Who is bobby?Ideology and method in the discovery of a Down syndrome person’s competence. In FergusonP. M.FergusonD. L.TaylorS. J. (Eds.), Interpreting disability: A qualitative reader (pp. 197–212). Teachers College Press.
GrigalM.HartD.WeirC. (2012). A survey of postsecondary education programs for students with intellectual disabilities in the United States. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 9, 223–233. https://doi.org/10.1111/jppi.12012
19.
HallC. G.CarterE. W.McCabeL. E.Batey LeeE.Kennedy Center Lauren Bethune-DixV. K. (2021). Teaching college students with intellectual disability: Faculty experiences with inclusive higher education. Journal of Inclusive Postsecondary Education, 3(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.13021/jipe.2021.2730
20.
Higher Education Opportunity Act of 2008, Pub. L. No. 110–315 § 122 STAT. 3078 (2008).
21.
KaferA. (2013). Feminist, queer, crip. Indiana University Press.
22.
KliewerC. (1998). Schooling children with Down syndrome: Toward an understanding of possibility. Teachers College Press.
23.
LynchK. B.GetzelE. E. (2013). Practice brief: Assessing impact of inclusive postsecondary education using the Think College Standards. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 26(4), 385–393.
24.
MadausJ. W.KowittJ. S.LalorA. R. (2012). The higher education opportunity act: Impact on students with disabilities. Rehabilitation Research, Policy, and Education, 26, 33–42. https://doi.org/10.1891/216866512805000893
25.
McDonaldK. E.KidneyC. A. (2012). What is right? Ethics in intellectual disabilities research. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 9(1), 27–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-1130.2011.00319.x
26.
McRuerR. (2006). Crip theory: Cultural signs of queerness and disability (Vol. 9). New YorkUniversity Press.
27.
MockM.LoveK. (2012). One state’s initiative to increase access to higher education for people with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 9(4), 289–297. https://doi.org/10.1111/jppi.12006
28.
NeubertD. A.ReddV. A. (2008). Transition services for students with intellectual disabilities: A case study of a public school program on a community college campus. Exceptionality, 16(4), 220–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362830802412265
29.
NussbaumM. C. (2006). Frontiers of justice: Disability, nationality, species membership. Harvard University Press.
30.
OliverM.BarnesC. (2012). The new politics of disablement. Macmillan International Higher Education.
31.
RogersR.Mosley WetzelM. (2014). Designing critical literacy education through critical discourse analysis: Pedagogical and research tools for teacher researchers. Routledge.
32.
RossJ.MarcellJ.WilliamsP.CarlsonD. (2013). Postsecondary education employment and independent living outcomes of persons with autism and intellectual disability. Journal of Post Secondary Education and Disability, 26, 337–351.
33.
SleeR. (2007). “Its” a fit-up! Inclusive education, higher education, policy and the discordant voice. In BartonL.AmrstrongF. (Eds.), Policy, experience and change: Cross-cultural reflections in inclusive education. Springer.
34.
ThomaC. A. (2013). Postsecondary education for students with intellectual disability (ID): Complex layers. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 26, 285–302.
35.
UditskyB.HughsonE. (2012). Inclusive postsecondary education—An evidence-based moral imperative. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 9(4), 298–302. https://doi.org/10.1111/jppi.12005
36.
VromanK. M. (2019). “And then you can prove them wrong”: The college experiences of students with intellectual and developmental disability labels [Doctoral dissertation]. Syracuse University.
37.
ZafftC.HartD.ZimbrichK. (2004). College career connection: A study of youth with intellectual disabilities and the impact of postsecondary education. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 39, 45–53.
