Fraction competence is essential for learning algebra and pursuing careers in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. However, many children have difficulty using fractions, especially those struggling with mathematics. In this study, we examined the effect of a Tier 2 multicomponent fraction intervention for fifth graders, using a multiple-probe design across groups. The intervention included multiple instructional components: (a) explicit instruction; (b) multiple representations; (c) addressing misconceptions; (d) flexibility, reversibility, and generalizations; and (e) self-graphing. The intervention addressed fraction concepts and skills that need to be taught at Grade Levels 3 to 5 based on the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics content standards. The researcher provided the intervention in an intervention classroom at a U.S. charter school three times a week. The total session length ranged from 885 to 906 min across the groups. The results of this study indicated a functional relation between the fraction intervention, and all six students’ percentages of correct answers obtained using fraction probes. The results from the fidelity of intervention and assessment and social validity during the intervention were also reported. Limitations and suggestions for future research and implications for practices are discussed.
AlonzoJ.TindalG.UlmerK.GlasgowA. (2006). easyCBM® online progress monitoring assessment system. Behavioral Research and Teaching, University of Oregon. https://www.easycbm.com
ArdoinS. P.DalyE. J. (2007). Introduction to the special series: Close encounters of the instructional kind—How the instructional hierarchy is shaping instructional research 30 years later. Journal of Behavioral Education, 16, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-006-9027-5
4.
BottgeB. A.TolandM. D.GassawayL.ButlerM.ChooS.GriffenA. K.MaX. (2015). Impact of enhanced anchored instruction in inclusive math classrooms. Exceptional Children, 81, 158–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402914551742
5.
BrooksJ. L. (2012). Counterbalancing for serial order carryover effects in experimental condition orders. Psychological Methods, 17, 600–614. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029310
6.
BryantB. R.BryantD. P.PorterfieldJ.DennisM. S.FalcomataT.ValentineC.BrewerC.BellK. (2016). The effects of a Tier 3 intervention on the mathematics performance of second grade students with severe mathematics difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 49, 176–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219414538516
7.
BurnsM. K.CoddingR. S.BoiceC. H.LukitoG. (2010). Meta-analysis of acquisition and fluency math interventions with instructional and frustration level skills: Evidence for a skill-by-treatment interaction. School Psychology Review, 39, 69–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2010.12087791
8.
CadyJ. A.HodgesT. E.CollinsR. L. (2015). A comparison of textbooks’ presentation of fractions. School Science and Mathematics, 115, 105–116. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12108
9.
ClarkeB.DoablerC. T.Strand CaryM.KostyD.BakerS.FienH.SmolkowskiK. (2014). Preliminary evaluation of a tier 2 mathematics intervention for first-grade students: Using a theory of change to guide formative evaluation activities. School Psychology Review, 43, 160–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2014.12087442
10.
Council for Exceptional Children. (2014). Standards for evidence-based practices in special education. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 46, 206–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059914531389
11.
CoyneM. D.McCoachD. B.WareS.AustinC. R.Loftus-RattanS. M.BakerD. L. (2019). Racing against the vocabulary gap: Matthew effects in early vocabulary instruction and intervention. Exceptional Children, 85, 163–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402918789162
12.
DennisM. S.SorrellsA. M.FalcomataT. S. (2016). Effects of two interventions on solving basic fact problems by second graders with mathematics learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 39, 95–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948715595943
13.
DoablerC. T.ClarkeB.StoolmillerM.KostyD. B.FienH.SmolkowskiK.BakerS. K. (2017). Explicit instructional interactions: Exploring the black box of a tier 2 mathematics intervention. Remedial and Special Education, 38, 98–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932516654219
14.
DoughertyB.BryantD. P.BryantB. R. (2017). Fraction module. The Meadows Center for Preventing Educational Risks.
15.
DoughertyB.BryantD. P.BryantB. R.DarroughR. L.PfannenstielK. H. (2015). Developing concepts and generalizations to build algebraic thinking: The reversibility, flexibility, and generalization approach. Intervention in School and Clinic, 50, 273–281. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451214560892
16.
DoughertyB.BryantD. P.BryantB. R.ShinM. (2016). Helping students with mathematics difficulties understand ratios and proportions. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 49, 96–105. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059916674897
17.
DysonN. I.JordanN. C.RodriguesJ.BarbieriC.RinneL. (2020). A fraction sense intervention for sixth graders with or at risk for mathematics difficulties. Remedial and Special Education, 41, 244–254. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932518807139
18.
EnnisR. P.LosinskiM. (2019a). Interventions to improve fraction skills for students with disabilities: A meta-analysis. Exceptional Children, 85, 367–386. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402918817504
19.
EnnisR. P.LosinskiM. (2019b). SRSD fractions: Helping students at risk for disabilities add/subtract fractions with unlike denominators. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 52, 399–412. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219419859509
20.
FletcherJ. M.VaughnS. (2009). Response to intervention: Preventing and remediating academic difficulties. Child Development Perspectives, 3, 30–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2008.00072.x
21.
FloresM. M.HintonV. M.MeyerJ. M. (2020). Teaching fraction concepts using the concrete-representational-abstract sequence. Remedial and Special Education, 41, 165–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932518795477
22.
FloresM. M.HintonV. M.TaylorJ. J. (2018). CRA fraction intervention for fifth-grade students receiving tier two interventions. Preventing School Failure, 62, 198–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2017.1414027
23.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD.MaloneA. S. (2016). Multilevel response-to-intervention prevention systems: Mathematics intervention at tier 2. In JimersonS. R.BurnsM. K.VanDerHeydenA. M. (Eds.), Handbook of response to intervention: The science and practice of multi-tiered systems of support (2nd ed., pp. 309–328). Springer.
24.
FuchsL. S.MaloneA.SchumacherR. F.NamkungJ.HamlettC. L.JordanN. C.SieglerR. S.GerstenR.ChangasP. (2016). Supported self-explaining during faction intervention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108, 493–508. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000073
FuchsL. S.SchumacherR. F.LongJ.NamkungJ.MaloneA. S.WangA.HamlettC. L.JordanN. C.SieglerR. S.ChangasP. (2016). Effects of intervention to improve at-risk fourth graders’ understanding, calculations, and word problems with fractions. Elementary School Journal, 116, 625–651. https://doi.org/10.1086/686303
27.
FuchsL. S.SchumacherR. F.SterbaS. K.LongJ.NamkungJ.MaloneA. S.HamlettC. L.JordanN. C.GerstenR.SieglerR. S.ChangasP. (2014). Does working memory moderate the effects of fraction intervention? An aptitude-treatment interaction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106, 499–514. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034341
28.
FuchsL. S.WangA. Y.PreacherK. J.MaloneA. S.FuchsD.PachmayrR. (2020). Addressing challenging mathematics standards with at-risk learners: A randomized controlled trial on the effects of fractions intervention at third grade. Exceptional Children, 87(2), 163–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402920924846
29.
GastD. L.LloydB. P.LedfordJ. R. (2018). Multiple baseline and multiple probe designs. In LedfordJ. R.GastD. L. (Eds.), Single case research methodology: Applications in special education and behavioral sciences (3rd ed., pp. 239–281). Routledge.
30.
GerstenR.BeckmannS.ClarkeB.FoegenA.MarshL.StarJ. R.WitzelB. (2009). Assisting students struggling with mathematics: Response to Intervention (RtI) for elementary and middle schools (NCEE 2009-4060). U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/practiceguide/2
31.
HackerD. J.KiuharaS. A.LevinJ. R. (2019). A metacognitive intervention for teaching fractions to students with or at-risk for learning disabilities in mathematics. ZDM, 51, 601–612. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01040-0
32.
HaringN. G.EatonM. D. (1978). Systematic instructional technology: An instructional hierarchy. In HaringN. G.LovittT. C.EatonM. D.HansenC. L. (Eds.), The fourth R: Research in the classroom (pp. 23–40). Merrill.
33.
HuntJ. H. (2014). Effects of a supplemental intervention focused in equivalency concepts for students with varying abilities. Remedial and Special Education, 35, 135–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932513507780
34.
HuntJ. H.MartinK.KhounmeuangA.SilvaJ.PattersonB.Welch-PtakJ. (2020). Design, development, and initial testing of asset-based intervention grounded in trajectories of student fraction learning. Learning Disability Quarterly. Advance Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948720963589
35.
HwangJ.RiccominiP. J. (2019). A descriptive analysis of the error patterns observed in the fraction-computation solution pathways of students with and without learning disabilities. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 46, 132–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534508419872256
36.
HwangJ.RiccominiP. J.HwangS. Y.MoranoS. (2019). A systematic analysis of experimental studies targeting fractions for students with mathematics difficulties. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 34, 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12187
37.
JimersonS. R.BurnsM. K.VanDerHeydenA. M. (2016). Handbook of response to intervention: The science and practice of multi-tiered systems of support (2nd ed.). Springer.
38.
KaraF.IncikabiL. (2018). Sixth grade students’ skills of using multiple representations in addition and subtraction operations in fractions. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 10, 463–474. https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2018438137
39.
KazdinA. E. (2011). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings. Oxford University Press.
40.
KennedyC. H. (2005). Single-case designs for educational research. Pearson.
41.
KimS. A.WangP.MichaelsC. A. (2015). Using explicit C-R-A instruction to teach fraction word problems solving to low-performing Asian English learners. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 31, 253–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2015.1030999
42.
KrutetskiiV. A. (1976). The psychology of mathematical abilities in school children. University of Chicago Press.
43.
LedfordJ. R.GastD. L. (2018). Single case research methodology: Applications in special education and behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Routledge.
44.
LedfordJ. R.ZimmermanK. N.SchwartzI.OdomS. L. (2018). Guide for the use of single case design research evidence. Division for Research of the Council for Exceptional Children.
45.
LosinskiM.EnnisR. P.SandersS.WisemanN. (2019). An investigation of SRSD to teach fractions to students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 85, 291–308. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402918813980
46.
MattaM.VolpeR. J.BrieschA. M.OwensJ. S. (2020). Five direct behavior rating multi-item scales: Sensitivity to the effects of classroom interventions. Journal of School Psychology, 81, 28–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2020.05.002
47.
McKeownD.KimballK.LedfordJ. (2015). Effects of asynchronous audio feedback on the story revision practices of students with emotional/behavioral disorders. Education and Treatment of Children, 38, 541–564. https://doi.org/10.1353/etc.2015.0020
48.
MoranoS.FloresM. M.HintonV.MeyerJ. (2020). A comparison of concrete-representational-abstract and concrete-representational-abstract-integrated fraction interventions for students with disabilities. Exceptionality, 28, 77–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2020.1727328
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2006). Curriculum focal points for prekindergarten through grade 8 mathematics: A quest for coherence.
52.
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics.
53.
National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008). Reports of the task groups and subcommittees.
54.
NeseJ. F.LaiC. F.AndersonD.JamgochianE. M.KamataA.SàezL.TindalG. (2010). Technical adequacy of the easyCBM mathematics measures: Grades 3–8, 2009–2010 version (Vol. 1007). Behavioral Research and Teaching, University of Oregon.
55.
ParkerR. I.VannestK. J.DavisJ. L.SauberS. B. (2011). Combining nonoverlap and trend for single-case research: Tau-U. Behavior Therapy, 42, 284–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2010.08.006
56.
PowellS. R.LembkeE. S.Ketterlin-GellerL. R.PetscherY.HwangJ.BosS. E.CoxT.HurtS.MasonE. N.Pruitt-BrittonT.ThomasE.HopkinsS. (2020). Data-based individualization in mathematics to support middle school teachers and their students with mathematics learning difficulty. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 69, 100897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100897
57.
PowellS. R.StevensE. A.HughesE. M. (2019). Math language in middle school: Be more specific. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 51, 286–295. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059918808762
58.
PustejovskyJ. E.ChenM.HamiltonB. (2020). scdhlm: A web-based calculator for between-case standardized mean differences (Version 0.5.1) [Web application]. https://jepusto.shinyapps.io/scdhlm
59.
RauM. A.AlevenV.RummelN.PardosZ. (2014). How should intelligent tutoring systems sequence multiple graphical representations of fractions? A multi-methods study. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 24, 125–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-013-0011-7
60.
SchumacherR. F.JayanthiM.GerstenR.DiminoJ.SpalloneS.HaymondK. S. (2018). Using the number line to promote understanding of fractions for struggling fifth graders: A formative pilot study. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 33, 192–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12169
61.
SchumacherR. F.MaloneA. S. (2017). Error patterns with fraction calculations at fourth grade as a function of students’ mathematics achievement status. The Elementary School Journal, 118, 105–127. https://doi.org/10.1086/692914
62.
ShinM.BryantD. P. (2015). Fraction interventions for students struggling to learn mathematics: A research synthesis. Remedial and Special Education, 36, 374–387. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932515572910
63.
SieglerR. S.DuncanG. J.Davis-KeanP. E.DuckworthK.ClaessensA.EngelM.SusperreguyM. I.ChenM. (2012). Early predictors of high school mathematics achievement. Psychological Science, 23, 691–697. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612440101
64.
SwanD. M.PustejovskyJ. E.BeretvasS. N. (2020). The impact of response-guided designs on count outcomes in single-case experimental design baselines. Evidence-based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 14, 82–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/17489539.2020.1739048
65.
ValentineJ. C.Tanner-SmithE. E.PustejovskyJ. E.LauT. S. (2016). Between-case standardized mean difference effect sizes for single-case designs: A primer and tutorial using the scdhlm web application. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 12, 1–31. https://doi.org/10.4073/cmdp.2016.1
66.
VannestK. J.ParkerR. I.GonenO.AdiguzelT. (2016). Single case research: Web based calculators for SCR analysis (Version 2.0) [Web-based application]. Texas A&M University. http://www.singlecaseresearch.org
67.
WangA. Y.FuchsL. S.FuchsD.GilbertJ. K.KrowkaS.AbramsonR. (2019). Embedding self-regulation instruction within fractions intervention for third graders with mathematics difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 52, 337–348. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219419851750
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
