The goal of the present article is to synthesize findings to date from the Delaware Longitudinal Study of Fraction Learning. The study followed a large cohort of children (N = 536) between Grades 3 and 6. The findings showed that many students, especially those with diagnosed learning disabilities, made minimal growth in fraction knowledge and that some showed only a basic grasp of the meaning of a fraction even after several years of instruction. Children with low growth in fraction knowledge during the intermediate grades were much more likely to fail to meet state standards on a broad mathematics measure at the end of Grade 6. Although a range of general and mathematics-specific competencies predicted fraction outcomes, the ability to estimate numerical magnitudes on a number line was a uniquely important marker of fraction success. Many children with mathematics difficulties have deep-seated problems related to whole number magnitude representations that are complicated by the introduction of fractions into the curriculum. Implications for helping students with mathematics difficulties are discussed.
American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
3.
BaddeleyA. D. (1986). Working memory. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
4.
BaroodyA. J.GinsburgH. P. (1986). The relationship between initial meaningful and mechanical knowledge of arithmetic. In HiebertJ. (Ed.), Conceptual and procedural knowledge: The case of mathematics (pp. 75–112). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5.
BarthH. C.PaladinoA. M. (2011). The development of numerical estimation: Evidence against a representational shift. Developmental Science, 14(1), 125–135. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2010.00962.x
6.
BonatoM.FabbriS.UmiltàC.ZorziM. (2007). The mental representation of numerical fractions: Real or integer?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33(6), 1410–1419. doi:10.1037/0096–1523.33.6.1410
7.
BoothJ. L.NewtonK. J.Twiss-GarrityL. K. (2014). The impact of fraction magnitude knowledge on algebra performance and learning. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 118, 110–118. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2013.09.001
8.
BottgeB. A.MaX.GassawayL.TolandM. D.ButlerM.ChoS. (2014). Effects of blended instructional models on math performance. Exceptional Children, 80(4), 423–437. doi:10.1177/0014402914527240
9.
BoyerT. W.LevineS. C. (2012). Child proportional scaling: Is 1/3 = 2/6 = 3/9 = 4/12?Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 111(3), 516–533. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2011.11.001
10.
ButterworthB. (1999). The mathematical brain. London, UK: Macmillan.
11.
ButterworthB. (2005). The development of arithmetical abilities. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 46(1), 3–18. doi:10.1111/j.1469–7610.2004.00374.x
12.
ButterworthB.Reigosa-CrespoV. (2007). Information processing deficits in dyscalculia. In BerchD. B.MazzoccoM. M. M. (Eds.), Why is math so hard for some children? The nature and origins of mathematical learning difficulties and disabilities (pp. 65–81). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
13.
CaseR.OkamotoY. (1996). The role of central conceptual structures in the development of children’s thought. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 61(1/2, Serial No. 246), 1–27. doi:10.2307/1166077
FuchsL. S.ComptonD. L.FuchsD.PaulsenK.BryantJ. D.HamlettC. L. (2005). The prevention, identification, and cognitive determinants of mathematics difficulty. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(3), 493–513. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.97.3.493
16.
FuchsL. S.SchumacherR. F.LongJ.NamkungJ.HamlettC. L.CirinoP. T.. . . ChangasP. (2017). Fraction intervention for students with mathematics difficulties: Lessons learned from five randomized control trials. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 50, 631–639.
FuchsL. S.SchumacherR. F.SterbaS. K.LongJ.NamkungJ.MaloneA.. . . ChangasP. (2014). Does working memory moderate the effects of fraction intervention? An aptitude-treatment interaction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(2), 499–514. doi:10.1037/a0034341
19.
GearyD. C. (2004). Mathematics and learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37(1), 4–15. doi:10.1177/00222194040370010201
20.
GelmanR.ButterworthB. (2005). Number and language: How are they related?Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(1), 6–10. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.11.004
21.
GerstenR.BeckmannS.ClarkeB.FoegenA.MarshL.StarJ. R.WitzelB. (2009). Assisting students struggling with mathematics: Response to intervention (RtI) for elementary and middle schools (NCEE 2009-4060). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance.
22.
GundersonE. A.RamirezG.BeilockS. L.LevineS. C. (2012). The relation between spatial skill and early number knowledge: The role of the linear number line. Developmental Psychology, 48(5), 1229–1241. doi:10.1037/a0027433
23.
HansenN.JordanN. C.RodriguesJ. (2015). Identifying learning difficulties with fractions: A longitudinal study of student growth from third through sixth grade. Contemporary Educational Psychology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.11.002
24.
HansenN.JordanN. C.SieglerR. S.FernandezE.GerstenR.FuchsL.MicklosD. (2015). General and math-specific predictors of sixth-graders’ knowledge of fractions. Cognitive Development, 35, 34–49. doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2015.02.011
25.
HechtS. (1998). Toward an information-processing account of individual differences in fraction skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(3), 545–559. doi:10.1037//0022–0663.90.3.545
26.
HechtS.CloseL.SantisiM. (2003). Sources of individual differences in fraction skills. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 86(4), 277–302. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2003.08.003
27.
HechtS. A.VagiK. J. (2010). Sources of group and individual differences in emerging fraction skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(4): 843–859. doi:10.1037/a0019824
28.
HechtS. A.VagiK. J. (2012). Patterns of strengths and weaknesses in children’s knowledge about fractions. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 111(2), 212–229. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2011.08.012
29.
JordanN. C.HansenN.FuchsL. S.SieglerR. S.GerstenR.MicklosD. (2013). Developmental predictors of fraction concepts and procedures. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 116(1), 45–58. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2013.02.001
30.
JordanN. C.KaplanD.RamineniC.LocuniakM. N. (2009). Early math matters: Kindergarten number competence and later mathematics outcomes. Developmental Psychology, 45(3), 850–867. doi:10.1037/a0014939
31.
LanderlK.BevanA.ButterworthB. (2004). Developmental dyscalculia and basic numerical capacities: A study of 8–9 year old students. Cognition, 93(2), 99–125. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2003.11.004
32.
LeFevreJ.FastL.SkwarchukS.Smith-ChantB. L.BisanzJ.KamawarD.Penner-WilgerM. (2010). Pathways to mathematics: Longitudinal predictors of performance. Child Development, 81(6), 1753–1767. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01508.x
33.
LocuniakM. N.JordanN. C. (2008). Using kindergarten number sense to predict calculation fluency in second grade. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41(5), 451–459. doi:10.1177/0022219408321126
34.
MeertG.GrégoireJ.NoëlM. P. (2010). Rational numbers: Componential versus holistic representation of fractions in a magnitude comparison task. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(8), 1598–1616. doi:10.1080/17470210802511162
35.
MöhringW.NewcombeN. S.LevineS. C.FrickA. (2015). Spatial proportional reasoning is associated with formal knowledge about fractions. Journal of Cognition and Development. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/15248372.2014.996289
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common Core state standards. Washington, DC: Author.
39.
PengP.NamkungJ.BarnesM.SunC. (2015). A meta-analysis of mathematics and working memory: Moderating effects of working memory domain, type of mathematics skill, and sample characteristics. Journal of Educational Psychology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1037/edu0000079
40.
PiazzaM.FacoettiA.TrussardiA. N.BertelettiI.ConteS.LucangeliD.. . . ZorziM. (2010). Developmental trajectory of number acuity reveals a severe impairment in developmental dyscalculia. Cognition, 116(1), 33–41. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.03.012
41.
PickeringS.GathercoleS. (2001). Working Memory Test Battery for Children. London, UK: Psychological Corp.
42.
PriceG. R.HollowayI.RäsänenP.VesterinenM.AnsariD. (2007). Impaired parietal magnitude processing in developmental dyscalculia. Current Biology, 17(24), 1042–1043. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2007.10.013
43.
Psychological Corp. (1992). Weschler Individual Achievement Test manual. San Antonio, TX: Author.
44.
RamaniG. B.SieglerR. S. (2008). Promoting broad and stable improvements in low-income children’s numerical knowledge through playing number board games. Child Development, 79(2), 375–394. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01131.x
45.
Reigosa-CrespoV.Valdas-SosaM.ButterworthB.EstavezN.RodriguezM.SantosE.. . . LageA. (2012). Basic numerical capacities and prevalence of developmental dyscalculia: The Havana Survey. Developmental Psychology, 48(1), 123–135. doi:10.1037/a0025356
46.
ResnickI.JordanN. C.HansenN.RajanV.RodriguesJ.SieglerR. S.FuchsL. (2016). Developmental growth trajectories in understanding of fraction magnitude from fourth through sixth grade. Developmental Psychology, 52(5), 746–757.
47.
Rittle-JohnsonB.AlibaliM. W. (1999). Conceptual and procedural knowledge of mathematics: Does one lead to the other?Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 1–16.
SeethalerP. M.FuchsL. S.StarJ. R.BryantJ. R. (2011). The cognitive predictors of computational skill with whole versus rational numbers: An exploratory study. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(5), 536–542. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2011.05.002
50.
SieglerR. S.DuncanG. J.Davis-KeanP. E.DuckworthK.ClaessensA.EngelM.. . . ChenM. (2012). Early predictors of high school mathematics achievement. Psychological Science, 23(7), 691–697. doi:10.1177/0956797612440101
51.
SieglerR. S.FazioL. K.BaileyD. H.ZhouX. (2013). Fractions: The new frontier for theories of numerical development. Trends in Cognitive Science, 17(1), 13–19. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2012.11.004
52.
SieglerR. S.FuchsL.JordanN.GerstenR.OchsendorfR. (2015). The Center for Improving Learning of Fractions: A progress report. In ChinnS. (Ed.), The Routledge international handbook of dyscalculia and mathematical learning disabilities (pp. 292–302). London, UK: Routledge.
53.
SieglerR. S.Lortie-ForguesH. (2014). An integrative theory of numerical development. Child Development Perspectives, 8(3), 144–150. doi:10.1111/cdep.12077
54.
SieglerR. S.OpferJ. E. (2003). The development of numerical estimation: Evidence for multiple representations of numerical quantity. Psychological Science, 14(3), 237–243. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.02438
55.
SieglerR. S.PykeA. A. (2013). Developmental and individual differences in understanding of fractions. Developmental Psychology, 49(10), 1994–2004. doi:10.1037/a0031200
56.
SieglerR. S.SternE. (1998). A microgenetic analysis of conscious and unconscious strategy discoveries. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127(4), 377–397. doi:10.1037/0096–3445.127.4.377
57.
SieglerR. S.ThompsonC. A.SchneiderM. (2011). An integrated theory of whole number and fractions development. Cognitive Psychology, 62(4), 273–296. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2011.03.001
58.
SophianC. (1997). Beyond competence: The significance of per-formance for conceptual development. Cognitive Develop-ment, 12, 281–303. doi:10.1016/S0885-2014(97)90001-0
59.
SwansonH. L. (2011). Working memory, attention, and mathematical problem solving: A longitudinal study of elementary school children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(4), 821–837. doi:10.1037/a0025114
60.
SwansonJ.SchuckS.MannM.CarlsonC.HartmanK.SergeantJ.et al (2006). Categorical and dimensional definitions and evaluations of symptoms of ADHD: The SNAP and SWAN rating scales. Unpublished manuscript, School of Medicine, University of California, Irvine.
61.
TianJ.SieglerR. S. (2017). Fractions learning in children with mathematics difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 50, 614–620.
62.
Van HoofJ.JanssenR.VerschaffelL.Van DoorenW. (2015). Inhibiting natural number knowledge in fourth graders: Towards a comprehensive test instrument. ZDM: The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 47(5), 849–857. doi:10.1007/s11858-014-0650-7
63.
VosniadouS.VamvakoussiX.SkopelitiI. (2008). The framework theory approach to conceptual change. In VosniadouS. (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 3–34). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
64.
VukovicR. K.FuchsL. S.GearyD. C.JordanN. C.GerstenR.SieglerR. S. (2014). Sources of individual differences in children’s understanding of fractions. Child Development, 85(4), 1461–1476. doi:10.1111/cdev.12218
65.
WechslerD. (1999). Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence (WASI). San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment.
66.
ZentallS. S.SmithY. N.LeeY. B.WieczorecC. (1994). Mathematical outcomes of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27(8), 510–519. doi:10.1177/002221949402700806
