A group, randomized, comparative effectiveness trial of two elementary universal preventive interventions (PAX Good Behavior Game [PAX GBG] and the integration of PAX GBG with Promoting Alternative THinking Strategies [PATHS to PAX]) was carried out in general education classrooms in 27 urban elementary schools. Ialongo et al. report on results of the trial for all students. Here, we examine the outcomes of students receiving special education services (N = 650). A linear mixed model analysis of variance (ANCOVA) was conducted with school included as a random effect to examine planned comparisons between conditions. Significant interactions were probed using the Johnson–Neyman technique. For significant and trending results, effect sizes were calculated. Results demonstrated improvement for a number of socioemotional and behavioral variables for students in either intervention, however, the integration of PATHS to PAX appeared to have the most substantial impact for students in special education. Effect sizes ranged from 0.07 to 0.50.
BakerP. H. (2005). Managing student behaviour: How ready are teachers to meet the challenge?American Secondary Education, 33(3), 50–67. https://jstor.org/journal/amersecedu
2.
BarrishH. H.SaundersM.WolfM. M. (1969). Good Behavior Game: Effects of individual contingencies for group consequences on disruptive behavior in a classroom. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2(2), 119–124. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1969.2-119
3.
BelferM. L. (2008). Child and adolescent mental disorders: The magnitude of the problem across the globe. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49(3), 226–236. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01855.x
4.
BerryR. A. W. (2008). Novice teachers’ conceptions of fairness in classrooms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(5), 1149–1159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2007.02.012
5.
BettencourtA. F.GrossD.HoG.PerrinN. (2018). The costly consequences of not being socially and behaviorally ready to learn by kindergarten in Baltimore City. Journal of Urban Health, 95(1), 36–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-017-0214-6
6.
BradshawC.ZmudaJ.KellamS.IalongoN. (2009). Longitudinal impact of two universal preventive interventions in first grade on educational outcomes in high school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(4), 926–937. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016586
7.
BreemanL. D.van LierP. A. C.WubbelsT.VerhulstF. C.van der EndeJ.MarasA.StruiksmaA. J. C.HopmanJ. A. B.TickN. T. (2016). Effects of the Good Behavior Game on the behavioral, emotional, and social problems of children with psychiatric disorders in special education settings. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 18(3), 156–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300715593466
8.
Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group. (1999). Initial impact of the Fast Track prevention trial for conduct problems II: Classroom effects. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67(5), 648–657. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-006x.67.5.648
9.
Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group. (2010). The effects of a multiyear universal social-emotional learning program: The role of student and school characteristics. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 78(2), 156–168. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018607
10.
DarneyD.ReinkeW. M.HermanK. C.StormontM.IalongoN. S. (2013). Children with co-occurring academic and behavior problems in first grade: Distal outcomes in twelfth grade. Journal of School Psychology, 51(1), 117–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2012.09.005
11.
de BoerA.PijlS. J.MinnaertA. (2012). Students’ attitudes towards peers with disabilities: A review of the literature. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 59(4), 379–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/1034912X.2012.723944
DemopoulosC.HopkinsJ.DavisA. (2013). A comparison of social cognitive profiles in child with autism spectrum disorders and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A matter of quantitative but not qualitative difference?Journal of Autism Developmental Disorders, 43(5), 1157–1170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-012-1657-y
14.
DolanL. J.KellamS. G.BrownC. H.Werthamer-LarssonL.RebokG. W.MayerL. S.LaudolffJ.TurkkanJ. S.FordC.WheelerL. (1993). The short-term impact of two classroom-based preventive interventions on aggressive and shy behaviors and poor achievement. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 14(3), 317–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/0193-3973(93)90013-L
15.
DomitrovichC. E.BradshawC. P.GreenbergM. T.EmbryD.PoduskaJ. M.IalongoN. S. (2010). Integrated models of school-based prevention: Logic and theory. Psychology in the Schools, 47(1), 71–88. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20452
16.
DrayJ.BownmanJ.CampbellE.FreundM.WolfendenL.HodderR. K.McElwaineK.TremainD.BartlemK.BaileyJ.SmallT.PalazziK.OldmeadowC.WiggersJ. (2017). Systematic review of universal resilience-focused interventions targeting child and adolescent mental health in the school setting. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 56(10), 813–824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2017.07.780
17.
DurlakJ. A. (2009). How to select, calculate, and interpret effect sizes. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 34(9), 917–928. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsp004
18.
DurlakJ. A.WeissbergR. P.DymnickiA. B.TaylorR. D.SchellingerK. B. (2011). The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: A meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions. Child Development, 82(1), 405–432. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01564.x
19.
EmbryD. D.StaatemeierG.RichardsonC.LaugerK.MitichJ. (2003). The PAX Good Behavior Game (1st ed.). Hazelden.
20.
FishbeinD.DomitrovichC.WilliamsJ.GitukiS.GuthrieC.ShapiroD.GreenbergM. (2016). Short-term intervention effects of the PATHS curriculum in young low-income children: Capitalizing on plasticity. Journal of Primary Prevention, 37(6), 493–511. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10935-016-0452-5
21.
GrantS.HamiltonL. S.WrabelS. L.GomezC. J.WhitakerA.LeschitzJ. T.UnluF.Chavez-HerreriasE. R.BakerG.BarrettM.HarrisM.RamosA. (2017). Social and emotional learning interventions under the Every Student Succeeds Act: Evidence review. RAND Corporation. https://rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR2133.html
22.
GreenbergM. T.AbenavoliR. (2017). Universal interventions: Fully exploring their impacts and potential to produce population-level impacts. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 10(1), 40–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2016.1246632
23.
GreenbergM. T.KuschéC. A. (2006). Building social and emotional competence: The PATHS curriculum. In JimersonS. R.FurlongM. J. (Eds.), Handbook of school violence and school safety: From research to practice (pp. 395–412). Lawrence Erlbaum.
24.
GreenbergM. T.KuschéC. A.RiggsN. (2004). The PATHS curriculum: Theory and research on neuro-cognitive development and school success. In ZinsJ.WeissbergR.WalberH. (Eds.), Building school success on social and emotional learning (pp. 170–188). Teachers College Press.
25.
HahnR.Fuqua-WhitleyD.WethingtonH.LowyJ.CrosbyA.FulliloveM.JohnsonR.LibermanA.MoscickiE.PriceL.SnyderS.TumaF.CoryS.StoneG.MukhopadhayaK.ChattopadhyayS.DahlbergL., & Task Force on Community Preventive Services. (2007). Effectiveness of universal school-based programs to prevent violent and aggressive behavior: A systematic review. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 33(Suppl. 2), S114–S129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2007.04.012
26.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Press.
27.
IalongoN.DomitrovichC.EmbryD.GreenbergM.LawsonA.BeckerK. D.BradshawC. (2019). A randomized controlled trial of the combination of two school-based universal preventive interventions. Developmental Psychology, 55(6), 1313–1325. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000715
28.
IalongoN.PoduskaJ.WerthamerL.KellamS. (2001). The distal impact of two first grade preventive interventions on conduct problems and disorder and mental health service need and utilization in early adolescence. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 9(3), 146–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/106342660100900301
29.
IalongoN.WerthamerL.KellamS. G.BrownC. H.WangS.LinY. (1999). Proximal impact of two first grade preventive interventions on the early risk behaviors for later substance abuse, depression and antisocial behavior. American Journal of Community Psychology, 27(5), 599–642. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1022137920532
30.
JiangD.SantosR.JosephsonW.MayerT.BoydL. (2018). A comparison of variable- and person-oriented approaches in evaluating a universal preventive intervention. Prevention Science, 19(6), 738–747. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-018-0881-x
31.
JohnsonP. O.NeymanJ. (1936). Tests of certain linear hypotheses and their application to some educational problems. Statistical Research Memoirs, 1, 57–93.
32.
KamC.-M.GreenbergM. T.KuschéC. A. (2004). Sustained effects of the PATHS curriculum on the social and psychological adjustment of children in special education. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 12(2), 66–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/01634266040120020101
33.
KellamS. G.BrownC. H.PoduskaJ.IalongoN.WangW.ToyinboP.PetrasH.FordC.WindhamA.WilcoxH. C. (2008). Effects of a universal classroom behavior management program in first and second grades on young adult behavioral, psychiatric, and social outcomes. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 95(Suppl. 1), S5–S28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.01.004
34.
KellamS. G.RebokG. W. (1992). Building developmental and etiological theory through epidemiological based preventive intervention trials. In McCordJ.TremblayR. E. (Eds.), Preventing antisocial behavior: Interventions from birth through adolescence (pp. 162–195). Neale Watson Academic Publishers.
35.
LachinJ. M. (2000). Statistical considerations in the intent-to-treat principle. Controlled Clinical Trials, 21(3), 241–243. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsp004
36.
MoffittT. E.ArseneaultL.BelskyD.DicsonN.HancoxR. J.HarringtonH.HoutsR.PoultonR.RobertsB. W.RossS.SearsM. R.ThomsonW. M.CaspiA. (2011). A gradient of childhood self-control predicts health, wealth, and public safety. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108(7), 2693–2698. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1010076108
37.
MorganP. L.FriscoM. L.FarkasG.HibelJ. (2010). A propensity score matching analysis of the effects of special education services. The Journal of Special Education, 43(4), 236–254. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466908323007
O’BrennanL. M.WaasdorpT. E.PasE. T.BradshawC. P. (2015). Peer victimization and social-emotional functioning: A longitudinal comparison of students in general and special education. Remedial and Special Education, 36(5), 275–285. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932515575615
40.
PetrasH.KellamS.BrownC. H.MuthénB.IalongoN.PoduskaJ. (2008). Developmental epidemiological courses leading to antisocial personality disorder and violent and criminal behavior: Effects by young adulthood of a universal preventive intervention in first- and second-grade classrooms. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 95(Suppl. 1), S45–S59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2007.10.015
41.
PetrasH.MasynK.KellamS.IalongoN. (2011). The developmental impact of two first grade preventive interventions on aggressive/disruptive behavior in childhood and adolescence: An application of latent transition growth mixture modeling. Prevention Science, 12(3), 300–313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-011-0216-7
42.
PotthoffR. F. (1964). On the Johnson-Neyman technique and some extensions thereof. Psychometrika, 29(3), 241–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02289721
43.
RiggsN. R.GreenbergM. T.KuschéC. A.PentzM. A. (2006). The mediational role of neurocognition in the behavioral outcomes of a social-emotional prevention program in elementary school students: Effects of the PATHS curriculum. Prevention Science, 7(1), 91–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-005-0022-1
44.
SchonfeldD. J.AdamsR. E.FredstromB. K.WeissbergR. P.GilmanR.VoyceC.TomlinR.Speese-LinehanD. (2015). Cluster-randomized trial demonstrating impact on academic achievement of elementary social-emotional learning. School Psychology Quarterly, 30(3), 406–420. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000099
45.
SPSS. (2013). IBM SPSS Statistics (Version 22.0).
46.
StreimannK.SelartA.TrummalA. (2020). Effectiveness of a universal, classroom-based preventive intervention (PAX GBG)in Estonia: A cluster-randomized controlled trial. Prevention Science, 21(2), 234–244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-019-01050-0
47.
SutherlandK. S.Lewis-PalmerT.StichterJ.MorganP. L. (2008). Examining the influence of teacher behavior and classroom context on the behavioral and academic outcomes for students with emotional or behavioral disorders. The Journal of Special Education, 41(4), 223–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466907310372
48.
TappJ.WehbyJ.EllisD. (1995). A multiple option observation system for experimental studies: MOOSES. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 27(1), 25–31. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03203616
49.
TaylorR. D.OberleE.DurlakJ. A.WeissbergR. P. (2017). Promoting positive youth development through school-based social and emotional learning interventions: A meta-analysis of follow-up effects. Child Development, 88(4), 1156–1171. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12864
50.
UrsacheA.BlairC.RaverC. C. (2012). The promotion of self-regulation as a means of enhancing school readiness and early achievement in children at risk for school failure. Child Development Perspectives, 6(2), 122–128. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2011.00209.x
Washington State Institute for Public Policy. (2018b). Promoting Alternative Thinking Strategies (PATHS)—Public health & prevention: School-based. http://www.wsipp.wa.gov/BenefitCost/Program/94
53.
Werthamer-LarssonL.KellamS. G.WheelerL. (1991). Effect of first-grade classroom environment on child shy behavior, aggressive behavior, and concentration problems. American Journal of Community Psychology, 19(4), 585–602. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00937993
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
