Agosta, E., Graetz, J.E., Mastropieri, M.A., & Scruggs, T.E. ( 2004). Teacher-researcher partnerships to improve social behavior through social stories. Intervention in School and Clinic , 39, 276-287.
2.
Algozzine, B., Ysseldyke, J., Christenson, S., & Thurlow, M. ( 1982). Teachers intervention choices for children exhibiting different behaviors in schools. Insitute for Research on Learning Disabilities, 76, 1052-1093.
3.
Ayres, B., Meyer, L., Erevelles, N., & Park-Lee, S. ( 1994). Easy for you to say: Teacher perspectives on implementing most promising practices. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 19, 84-93.
4.
Boardman, A.G., Arguelles, M.E., Vaughn, S., Hughes, M.T., & Klingner, J. ( 2005). Special education teachers’ views of research-based practices. Journal of Special Education, 39, 168-180.
5.
Carter, S.L. ( 2007). Review of recent treatment acceptability research. Education and Training in Developmental Disability, 42, 301-316.
6.
Elliot, S.N., Witt, J.C., Kratochwill, T.R., & Stoiber, K.C. ( 2002). Selecting and evaluating interventions. In M. R., Shinn, H. M. Walker, & G. Stoner (Eds.), Interventions for academic and behavior problems II (pp. 315-350). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists .
7.
Fullan, M.G., & Miles, M.B. ( 1992). Getting reform right: What works and what doesn’t . Phi Delta Kappan, 73, 774-752.
8.
Hanley, G.P., Iwata, B.A., & McCord, B.E. (2003). Functional analysis of problem behavior: A review. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis , 36, 147-185.
9.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. (2004).
10.
Kazdin, A.E. ( 1980). Acceptability of alternative treatments for deviant child behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 132, 259-273.
11.
Kennedy, C.H. ( 2002). The maintenance of behavior change as an indicator of social validity. Behavior Modification, 26, 594-604.
12.
Lang, R., O’Reilly, M.F., Sigafoos, J., Machalicek, W., Rispoli, M., Shogren, K., . . . Hopkins, S. ( 2010). Review of teacher involvement in the applied intervention research for children with autism spectrum disorders. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disability, 45, 268-283.
13.
Machalicek, W., O’Reilly, M., Chan, J., Rispoli, M., Lang, R., Davis, T., Shogren, K., . . . Langthorne, P. (2009). Using video conferencing to support teachers to conduct preference assessments with students with autism and developmental disabilities. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 3, 32-41.
14.
McInerney, M., & Hamilton, J.L. (2007). Elementary and middle schools technical assistance center: An approach to support the effective implementation of scientifically based practices in special education. Exceptional Children, 73, 242-255.
15.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, 20 U.S.C. 70 § 6301 et seq. (2002).
16.
Odom, S.L., Brantlinger, E., Gersten, R., Horner, R.H., Thompson, B., & Harris, K.R. ( 2005). Research in special education: Scientific methods and evidence-based practices. Exceptional Children, 71, 137-148.
17.
Taber, T.A., Seltzer, A., Heflin, J.L., & Alberto, P.A. ( 2000). Use of self-operated auditory prompts to decrease off-task behavior for a student with autism and moderate mental retardation. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 14, 159-166.
18.
Witt, J.C., & Elliot, S.N. ( 1985). Acceptability of classroom intervention strategies. In T. Kratochwill (Ed.), Advances in school psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 251-288). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19.
Wolf, M.M. ( 1978). Social validity: The case for subjective measurement or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 203-214.
