Simple sentence construction is a foundational writing skill that forms the building blocks of advanced writing. Many middle school students with disabilities struggle to consistently construct simple sentences, thereby hindering development of written expression. The present study used a single-case, multiple-baseline across participants design to investigate the effects of a multicomponent intervention on fluency of sentence construction in response to picture-word prompts. During intervention, three middle school students with disabilities completed six explicit instruction lessons, followed by 15 sessions of timed practice, referred to as sentence instruction and frequency building to a performance criterion. After the first few sentence instruction lessons, all students gradually increased the accuracy and frequency of word sequences during intervention. Tau-U values for writing sequences were large. After completing intervention, all students maintained levels similar to intervention. Results are discussed in the context of writing fluency, prior intervention studies, and implications for practice.
ArcherA.HughesC. (2011). Explicit instruction: Efficient and effective teaching. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
2.
BerningerV.GarciaN.AbbottR. (2010). Multiple processes that matter in writing instruction and assessment. In TroiaG. A. (Ed.), Instruction and assessment for struggling writers: Evidence-based practices (pp. 15–74). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
3.
BerningerV.NagyW.BeersS. (2011). Child writers’ construction and reconstruction of single sentences and construction of multi-sentence texts: Contributions of syntax and transcription to translation. Reading and Writing, 24, 151–182.
4.
BerningerV.RichardsT.AbbottR. (2015). Differential diagnosis of dysgraphia, dyslexia, and OWL LD: Behavioral and neuroimaging evidence. Reading and Writing, 28, 1119–1153. doi:10.1007/s11145-015-9565-0
5.
BerningerV.VaughanK.AbbottR.BegayK.ColemanK.CurtinG.. . . GrahamS. (2002). Teaching spelling and composition alone and together: Implications for the simple view of writing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 291–304.
6.
DatchukS. (2016). Writing simple sentences and descriptive paragraphs: Effects of an intervention on adolescents with writing difficulties. Journal of Behavioral Education, 25, 166–188. doi:10.1007/s10864-015-9236-x
7.
DatchukS. (2017). A direct instruction and precision teaching intervention to improve the sentence construction of middle school students with writing difficulties. The Journal of Special Education, 51, 62–71. doi:10.1177/0022466916665588
8.
DatchukS.KubinaR. (2013). A review of teaching sentence-level writing skills to students with writing difficulties and learning disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 34, 180–192.
9.
DatchukS.KubinaR. (2017). A writing intervention to teach simple sentences and descriptive paragraphs to adolescents with writing difficulties. Education and Treatment of Children, 40, 303–326.
10.
DatchukS.KubinaR.MasonL. (2015). Effects of sentence instruction and frequency building to a performance criterion on elementary-aged students with behavioral concerns and EBD. Exceptionality, 23, 34–53.
11.
FinneganE.AccardoA. (2018). Written expression in individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A meta-analysis. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 48, 868–882. doi:10.1007/s10803-017-3385-9
12.
GrahamS.BruchJ.FitzgeraldJ.FriedrichL.FurgesonJ.GreeneK.. . . Smither WulsinC. (2016). Teaching secondary students to write effectively (NCEE 2017-4002). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
13.
GrahamS.CapizziA.HarrisK.HebertM.MorphyP. (2014). Teaching writing to middle school students: A national survey. Reading and Writing, 27, 1015–1042.
14.
GrahamS.CollinsA.Rigby-WillsH. (2017). Writing characteristics of students with learning disabilities and typically achieving peers: A meta-analysis. Exceptional Children, 83, 199–218. doi:10.1177/0014402916664070
15.
HornerR. H.CarrE. G.HalleJ.McGeeG.OdomS.WoleryM. (2005). The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 165–197. doi:10.1177/001440290507100203
16.
JohnsonK.StreetE. (2012). Response to intervention and precision teaching: Creating synergy in the classroom. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
17.
KleinP.BoscoloP. (2016). Trends in research on writing as a learning activity. Journal of Writing Research, 7, 311–350. doi:10.17239/jowr-2016.07.03.01
KubinaR.YurichK. (2012). The precision teaching book. Lemont, PA: Greatness Achieved.
20.
LedfordJ.GastD. (2018). Single case research methodology: Applications in special education and behavioral sciences. New York, NY: Routledge.
21.
McMasterK.EspinC. (2007). Technical features of curriculum-based measurement in writing: A literature review. The Journal of Special Education, 41, 68–84.
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards for English language arts. Washington, DC: Author.
24.
ParkerR. I.VannestK. J.DavisJ. L. (2011). Effect size in single-case research: A review of nine nonoverlap techniques. Behavior Modification, 35, 303–322. doi:10.1177/0145445511399147
25.
RayA.GrahamS.HoustonJ.HarrisK. (2016). Teachers use of writing to support students’ learning in middle school: A national survey in the United States. Reading and Writing, 29, 1039–1068. doi:10.1007/s11145-015-9602-z
26.
SaddlerB.Ellis-RobinsonT.Asaro-SaddlerK. (2018). Using sentence combining instruction to enhance the writing skills of children with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 16, 191–202.
27.
TroiaG. A.LinS. C.MonroeB. W.CohenS. (2009). The effects of writing workshop instruction on motivation and performance of good and poor writers. In TroiaG. A. (Ed.), Instruction and assessment for struggling writers: Evidence-based practices (pp. 77–112). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
28.
VannestK.NinciJ. (2015). Evaluating intervention effects in single-case research designs. Journal of Counseling & Development, 93, 403–411.
29.
VannestK.ParkerR.GonenO.AdiguzelT. (2016). Single case research: Web-based calculators for SCR analysis (Version 2.0). College Station: Texas A&M University. Available from http://www.singlecaseresearch.org/
30.
Viel-RumaK.HouchinsD.JolivetteK.FredrickL.GamaR. (2010). Direct instruction in written expression: The effects on English speakers and English language learners with disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 25, 97–108.
31.
WalkerB.ShippenM.AlbertoP.HouchinsD.CihakD. (2005). Using the expressive writing program to improve the writing skills of high school students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 20, 175–183.
32.
WalkerB.ShippenM.HouchinsD.CihakD. (2007). Improving the writing skills of high school students with learning disabilities using the expressive writing program. International Journal of Special Education, 22, 66–76.
33.
WhiteM.HouchinsD.Viel-RumaK.DeverB. (2014). Effects of direct instruction plus procedural facilitation on the expository writing of adolescents with emotional and behavioral disabilities in residential schools. Education and Treatment of Children, 37, 567–587.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
