Instructional choice is a low-intensity strategy that can improve academic engagement. In this study, we investigated the effects of within-activity choices offered during math by third-grade teachers to participating students with behavioral and academic needs. We utilized a professional development model to train teachers to implement instructional choice in the classroom while collecting direct observation data on student’s academic engagement. Teachers were able to implement practices with high levels of integrity and collect momentary time sampling data on one student with high levels of reliability. Using a withdrawal design, we found no clear functional relation between instructional choice and increases in student’s academic engagement. However, some students demonstrated an increase in level upon the introduction of the intervention. Both teachers and students rated the intervention goals, procedures, and outcomes as acceptable. Possible reasons for a lack of treatment effect on student academic engagement are discussed.
CarsonP. M.EckertT. L. (2003). An experimental analysis of mathematics instructional components: Examining the effects of student-selected versus empirically selected interventions. Journal of Behavioral Education, 12, 35–54.
CookB. G. (2016). Reforms in academic publishing: Should behavioral disorders and special education journals embrace them?Behavioral Disorders, 41, 161–172.
4.
CookB. G.CookS. C. (2013). Unraveling evidence-based practices in special education. The Journal of Special Education, 47, 71–82. doi:10.1177/0022466911420877
5.
Council for Exceptional Children. (2014). Council for Exceptional Children: Standards for evidence-based practices in special education. Arlington, VA: Author.
6.
DibleyS.LimL. (1999). Providing choice making opportunities within and between daily school routines. Journal of Behavioral Education, 9, 117–132. doi:10.1023/A:1022888917128
7.
DrummondT. (1994). The Student Risk Screening Scale (SRSS). Grants Pass, OR: Josephine County Mental Health Program.
8.
EnnisR. P.EvanovichL.LosinskiM.JolivetteK.KimballK. (2017). Behavioral, academic, and social characteristics of students with EBD served in a residential facility. In Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities (Vol. 40). Bingley, UK: Emerald Insight.
9.
EnnisR. P.JolivetteK.FredrickL. D.AlbertoP. A. (2013). Using comparison peer behavior as an objective measure of social validity: Recommendations for researchers. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 28, 195–201.
10.
EnnisR. P.LaneK. L.OakesW. P. (2017). Empowering teachers with low-intensity strategies to support instruction: Implementing across-activity choices in 3rd grade reading. Manuscript in review.
11.
FornessS. R.FreemanS. F. N.PaparellaT.KauffmanJ. M.WalkerH. M. (2012). Special education implications of point and cumulative prevalence for children with emotional or behavioral disorders. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 20, 4–18.
12.
GastD. L.LedfordJ. R. (Eds.). (2014). Single case research methodology: Applications in special education and behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
13.
GreshamF. M.ElliottS. N. (2008). Social Skills Improvement System–Rating Scales. Bloomington, MN: Pearson Assessments.
14.
GreshamF. M.ElliottS. N.VanceM. J.CookC. R. (2011). Comparability of the Social Skills Rating System to the Social Skills Improvement System: Content and psychometric comparisons across elementary and secondary age levels. School Psychology Quarterly, 26, 27–44.
15.
Individuals With Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, 20 U.S.C. 1400 et seq. (2004). (reauthorization of Individuals With Disabilities Act 1990).
16.
JohnsB. H.CrowleyE. P.GuetzloeE. (2008). Engaged time in the classroom. Focus on Exceptional Children, 41, 1–6.
17.
JolivetteK.EnnisR. P.SwoszowskiN. (in press). Choice-making at Tier 2: Linking and adapting choice by type and function. Journal of Classroom Interaction.
18.
JolivetteK.StichterJ. P.SibilskyS.ScottT. M.RidgleyR. (2002). Naturally occurring opportunities for preschool children with or without disabilities to make choices. Education and Treatment of Children, 25, 396–414.
19.
JolivetteK.WehbyJ. H.CanaleJ.MasseyN. G. (2001). Effects of choice-making opportunities on the behavior of students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 26, 131–145.
20.
KauchakD.EggenP. (1993). Learning and teaching. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
21.
KauffmanJ. M.LandrumT. J. (2018). Characteristics of emotional and behavioral disorders of children and youth (11th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
22.
LaneK. L.MenziesH. M.EnnisR. P.OakesW. P. (2015). Supporting behavior for school success: A step-by-step guide to key strategies. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
23.
LaneK. L.MenziesH. M.OakesW. P.LambertW.CoxM. L.HankinsK. (2012). A validation of the Student Risk Screening Scale for internalizing and externalizing behaviors: Patterns in rural and urban elementary schools. Behavioral Disorders, 37, 244–270.
24.
LaneK. L.OakesW. P.EnnisR. P. (2012). Empowering teachers with low-intensity strategies to support instruction self-assessment: Knowledge, confidence, and use (Unpublished rating scale).
25.
LaneK. L.OakesW. P.MenziesH. M. (2010). Systematic screenings to prevent the development of learning and behavior problems: Considerations for practitioners, researchers, and policy makers. Journal of Disabilities Policy Studies, 21, 160–172.
26.
LaneK. L.RoyerD. J.MessengerM.CommonE.EnnisR. P.SwoggerE. D. (2015). Empowering teachers with low-intensity strategies to support academic engagement: Implementation and effects of instructional choice for elementary students in inclusive settings. Education and Treatment of Children, 38, 473–504. doi:10.1353/etc.2015.0013
27.
LaneK. L.WalkerH. M. (2015). The connection between assessment and intervention: How does screening lead to better interventions? In BatemanB.TankersleyM.LloydJ. (Eds.), Enduring issues in special education: Personal perspectives (pp. 283–301). New York, NY: Routledge.
28.
LaneK. L.WehbyJ. H.LittleM. A.CooleyC. (2005). Academic, social, and behavioral profiles of students with emotional and behavioral disorders educated in self-contained classrooms and self-contained schools: Part I—Are they more alike than different?Behavioral Disorders, 30, 349–361.
29.
LannieA. L.MartensB. K. (2008). Targeting performance dimensions in sequence according to the instructional hierarchy: Effects on children’ math work within a self-monitoring program. Journal of Behavioral Education, 17, 356–375. doi:10.1007/s10864-008-9073-2
30.
LarawayS.SnycerskiS.MichaelJ.PolingA. (2003). Motivating operations and some terms to describe them: Some further refinements. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 36, 407–414.
31.
MaagJ. W.LosinskiM. (2016). Replications in the social sciences: Conspicuous absence or veiled presence?Psychology and Education, 53(2), 1–12.
32.
MessengerM.CommonE. A.LaneK. L.OakesW. P.MenziesH. M.EnnisR. P. (in press). Increasing opportunities to respond for students with internalizing behaviors: The utility of choral and mixed responding. Behavioral Disorders, 42, 170–184.
33.
MessengerM.LaneK. L.CommonE.OakesW. P.MenziesH. M.CantwellE. D.EnnisR. P. (2017). Empowering teachers with low-intensity strategies to support student engagement: Increasing opportunities to respond for students with internalizing behaviors. Behavioral Disorders, 42, 170–184.
34.
MichaelJ. (2007). Motivating operations. In CooperJ. O.HeronT. E.HewardW. L. (Eds.), Applied behavior analysis (2nd ed., pp. 374–391). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Renaissance Learning. (2016). STAR 360 Assessments. Wisconsin Rapids, WI: Author.
38.
RispoliM.LangR.NeelyL.CamargoS.HutchinsN.DavenportK.. . . GoodwynF. (2013). A comparison of within- and across-activity choices for reducing challenging behavior in children with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Behavioral Education, 22, 66–83.
39.
RomaniukC.MiltenbergerR.ConyersC.JennerN.JurgensM.RingenbergC. (2002). The influence of activity choice on problem behaviors maintained by escape versus attention. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 35, 349–362. doi:10.1901/jaba.2002.35-349
40.
RoyerD. J.LaneK. L.CantwellE. D.MessengerM. (2017). A systematic review of the evidence base for instructional choice in K-12 settings. Behavioral Disorders, 42, 89–107. doi:10.1177/0198742916688655
41.
SattlerJ. M. (1991). Assessment of children (3rd ed.). San Diego, CA: Author.
42.
ShapiroE. S. (2013). Academic skills problems workbook (4th ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
43.
ShogrenK. A.Faggella-LubyM. N.BaeS. J.WehmeyerM. L. (2004). The effect of choice-making as an intervention for problem behavior: A meta-analysis. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 6, 228–237.
44.
SugaiG.HornerR. H. (2002). Introduction to the special series on positive behavior support in schools. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 10, 130–135.
45.
SugaiG.HornerR. H. (2006). A promising approach for expanding and sustaining school-wide positive behavior support. School Psychology Review, 35, 245–260.
46.
WagnerM.CametoR. (2004). The characteristics, experiences, and outcomes of youth with emotional disturbances. NLTS2 Data Brief, 3(2), 1–8.
47.
WalkerH. M.RamseyE.GreshamF. M. (2004). Antisocial behavior in school: Evidence-based practices. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
48.
WalkerH. M.SeversonH.FeilE. G. (2014). Systematic Screening for Behavior Disorders: Technical manual. Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
49.
WechslerD. (2014). The Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children–Fifth Edition. London, England: Pearson Assessment.
50.
WittJ. C.ElliottS. N. (1985). Acceptability of classroom intervention strategies. In KratochwillT. R. (Ed.), Advances in school psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 251–288). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
