Using the least restrictive environments (LRE) data from annual Reports to Congress, this study examined national trends in placement between 2000 and 2014 for school-aged students considered to have significant disabilities from among the categories of autism (ASD), intellectual disability (ID), multiple disabilities (MD), and deaf-blindness (DB). Educational placement trends were calculated using a log ratio index, and students with significant disabilities were compared with groups of students from the other disability groups. Results confirmed that access to general education settings is lacking for this group of students. Implications for policies and practices as well as suggested future research are provided.
AitchisonJ. (1986). The statistical analysis of compositional data. London, England: Springer.
2.
AjuwonP. M.OyinladeA. O. (2008). Educational placement of children who are blind or have low vision in residential and public schools: A national study of parents’ perspectives. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 102, 325–339.
3.
AndersonC. J. K.KlassenR. M.GeorgiouG. K. (2007). Inclusion in Australia: What teachers say they need and what school psychologists can offer. School Psychology International, 28, 131–147. doi:10.1177/0143034307078086
4.
AyresK. M.DouglasK. H.LowreyK. A.SieversC. (2011). I can identify Saturn but I can’t brush my teeth: What happens when the curricular focus for students with severe disabilities shifts. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 46, 11–21.
BrockM. E.SchaeferJ. M. (2015). Location matters: Geographic location and educational placement of students with developmental disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 40, 154–164. doi:10.1177/1540796915591988
7.
CarterE. W.HughesC. (2005). Increasing social interaction among adolescents with intellectual disabilities and their general education peers: Effective interventions. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 30, 179–193.
8.
CarterE. W.SiscoL. G.ChungY.Stanton-ChapmanT. L. (2010). Peer interactions of students with intellectual disabilities and/or autism: A map of the intervention literature. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 35, 63–79.
9.
CaustonJ.TheoharisG. (2014). How do schools become effective and inclusive? In McLeskeyJ.WaldronN. L.SpoonerF.AlgozzineB. (Eds.), Handbook of effective inclusive schools: Research and practice (pp. 30–42). New York, NY: Routledge.
10.
CosierM.Causton-TheoharisJ.TheoharisG. (2013). Does access matter? Time in general education and achievement for students with disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 34, 323–332. doi:10.1177/0741932513485448
11.
DanielsonL. C.BellamyG. T. (1989). State variation in placement of children with handicaps in segregated environments. Exceptional Children, 55, 448–455.
12.
DessemontetR. S.BlessG. (2013). The impact of including children with intellectual disability in general education classrooms on the academic achievement of their low-, average-, and high-achieving peers. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 38, 23–30.
13.
DessemontetR. S.BlessG.MorinD. (2012). Effects of inclusion on the academic achievement and adaptive behaviour of children with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 56, 579–587.
14.
DymondS. K.GilsonC. L.MyranS. P. (2007). Services for children with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 18, 133–147.
15.
GartlandD. (2004). State and district-wide assessments and students with learning disabilities: A guide for states and school districts. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 27(Spring), 67–76.
16.
HarrisS.HandlemanJ. (2000). Age and IQ at intake as predictors of placement for young children with autism: A four- to six-year follow-up. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 30, 137–142.
17.
HughesC. (2008). Postsecondary outcomes in the 21st century—A change is gonna come?Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 33, 100–102.
18.
HughesC.AgranM.CosgriffJ. C.WashingtonB. H. (2013). Student self-determination: A preliminary investigation of the role of participation in inclusive settings. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 48, 3–17.
19.
HuntP.McDonnellJ.CrockettM. A. (2012). Reconciling an ecological curricular framework focusing on quality of life outcomes with the development and instruction of standards-based academic goals. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 37, 139–152.
20.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act, H.R. 1350, Pub. L, No. PL 108-446 (2004). 20 U.S.C. Sec. 1412(a)(5)(A) 2004.
21.
JimenezB. A.BrowderD. M.SpoonerF.DibiaseW. (2012). Inclusive inquiry science using peer-mediated embedded instruction for students with moderate intellectual disability. Exceptional Children, 78, 301–317.
22.
KatsiyannisA.ZhangD.ArchwmetyT. (2002). Placement and exit patterns for students with mental retardation: An analysis of national trends. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 37, 134–145.
23.
KauffmanJ. M.LandrumT. J.MockD. R.SayeskiB.SayeskiK. L. (2005). Diverse knowledge and skills require a diversity of instructional groups: A position statement. Remedial and Special Education, 26, 2–6. doi:10.1177/07419325050260010101
24.
KauffmanJ. M.LloydJ. W. (2011). Statistics, data, and special educational decisions. In KauffmanJ. M.HallahanD. P.PullenP. C. (Eds.), Handbook of special education (pp. 27–36). New York, NY: Routledge.
25.
KleinertH.Towles-ReevesE.QuenemoenR.ThurlowM.FlueggeL.WesemanL.KerbelA. (2015). Where students with the most significant cognitive disabilities are taught implications for general curriculum access. Exceptional Children, 81, 312–328. doi:10.1177/0014402914563697
26.
KurthJ. A. (2015). Educational placement of students with autism: The impact of state of residence. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 30, 249–256. doi:10.1177/1088357614547891
27.
KurthJ. A.BornK.LoveH. (2016). Ecobehavioral characteristics of self-contained high school classrooms for students with severe cognitive disability. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1540796916661492
28.
KurthJ. A.LyonK. J.ShogrenK. A. (2015). Supporting students with severe disabilities in inclusive schools: A descriptive account from schools implementing inclusive practices. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 40, 261–274. doi:10.1177/1540796915594160
29.
KurthJ. A.MastergeorgeA. M. (2012). Impact of setting and instructional context for adolescents with autism. Journal of Special Education, 46, 36–48.
30.
KurthJ. A.MorningstarM. E.KozleskiE. (2014). The persistence of highly restrictive special education placements for students with low-incidence disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 39, 227–239. doi:10.1177/1540796914555580
31.
Lauderdale-LittinS.HowellE.BlacherJ. (2013). Educational placement for children with autism spectrum disorders in public and non-public school settings: The impact of social skills and behavior problems. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 48, 469–478.
32.
LyonsJ.CappadociaM. C.WeissJ. A. (2011). Brief report: Social characteristics of students with autism spectrum disorders across classroom settings. Journal on Developmental Disabilities, 17, 77–82.
33.
MarxT. A.HartJ. L.NelsonL.LoveJ.BaxterC. M.GartinB.WhitbyP. J. (2014). Guiding IEP teams on meeting the least restrictive environment mandate. Intervention in School and Clinic, 50, 45–50.
34.
MaytonM. R.CarterS. L.ZhangJ.WheelerJ. J. (2014). Intrusiveness of behavioral treatments for children with autism and developmental disabilities: An initial investigation. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 49, 92–101. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2013.10.023
35.
McLeskeyJ. (2007). Reflections on inclusion: Classic articles that shaped our thinking. Arlington, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
36.
McLeskeyJ.HoppeyD.WilliamsonP.RentzT. (2004). Is inclusion an illusion? An examination of national and state trends toward the education of students with learning disabilities in general education classrooms. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 19, 109–115.
37.
McLeskeyJ.LandersE.WilliamsonP.HoppeyD. (2012). Are we moving toward educating students with disabilities in less restrictive settings?Journal of Special Education, 46, 131–140.
38.
McLeskeyJ.WaldronN. L.ReddL. (2014). What are effective inclusive schools and why are they important? In McLeskeyJ.WaldronN. L.SpoonerF.AlgozzineB. (Eds.), Handbook of effective inclusive schools (pp. 30–42). New York, NY: Routledge.
39.
MeoG. (2008). Curriculum planning for all learners: Applying universal design for learning (UDL) to a high school reading comprehension program. Preventing School Failure, 52, 21–30. doi:10.3200/PSFL.52.2.21-30
40.
MorenoJ.AguileraA.SaldanaD. (2008). Do Spanish parents prefer special schools for their children with autism?Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 43, 162–173.
41.
MorningstarM. E.KurthJ. A. (in press). Status of inclusive educational placement for students with extensive and pervasive support needs. Inclusion.
42.
MorningstarM. E.LombardiA.FowlerC. H.TestD. W. (2015). A college and career readiness framework for secondary students with disabilities. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/2165143415589926
43.
MorningstarM. E.ShogrenK.LeeH.BornK. (2015). Preliminary lessons about supporting participation and learning in inclusive classrooms. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 40, 192–210. doi:10.1177/154079691559415
44.
PivikJ.McComasJ.LaFlammeM. (2002). Barriers and facilitators to inclusive education. Exceptional Children, 69, 97–107.
45.
RupparA. L.GaffneyJ. S. (2011). Individualized education program team decisions: A preliminary study of conversations, negotiations, and power. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 36, 11–22.
46.
RyndakD.JacksonL. B.WhiteJ. M. (2013). Involvement and progress in the general curriculum for students with extensive support needs: K-12 inclusive-education research and implications for the future. Inclusion, 1, 28–49. doi:10.1352/2326-6988-1.1.028
47.
RyndakD.TaubD.JorgensenC. M.Gonsier-GerdinJ.AnrdtK.SauerJ.. . . AllcockH. (2014). Policy and the impact on placement, involvement, and progress in general education: Critical issues that require rectification. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 39, 65–74. doi:10.1177/1540796914533942
48.
U.S. Department of Education. (2014). Thirty-sixth annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/about/reports/annual/osep/2014/index.html
VaughnS.FletcherJ. M. (2012). Response to intervention with secondary school students with reading difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45, 244–256.
51.
WhiteS. W.ScahillL.KlinA.KoenigK.VolkmarF. R. (2007). Educational placements and service use patterns of individuals with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37, 1403–1412. doi:10.1007/s10803-006-0281-0
52.
WilliamsonP.McLeskeyJ.RentzT. (2006). Educating students with mental retardation in general education classrooms. Exceptional Children, 72, 347–361.
53.
YellM. L.KatsiyannisA. (2004). Placing students with disabilities in inclusive settings: Legal guidelines and preferred practices. Preventing School Failure, 49, 28–35.
