This exploratory case study examined how general and special education teachers in one school district interpreted three frequently used accommodations. Although a majority of both groups agreed on interpretations of extended time, there was little agreement, considerable variation, and some contradiction in their understanding of the changes intended by scribing and preferential seating. Recommendations include suggestions for replacing ambiguous accommodations with functional descriptions, linking accommodations more directly with barriers presented by disabilities, and paying particular attention to ensuring that interpretations are shared as students move through their school experience.
Bolt, S.E., & Thurlow, M.L. (2004). Five of the most frequently allowed testing accommodations in state policy: Synthesis of research. Remedial and Special Education, 25(3), 141-152.
2.
Brantlinger, E., Jimenez, R., Klingner, J., Pugach, M., & Richardson, V. (2005). Qualitative studies in special education. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 195-207.
3.
Edgemon, E.A., Jablonski, B.R., & Lloyd, J.W. (2006). Large-scale assessments: A teacher's guide to making decisions about accommodations. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 38(3), 6-11.
4.
Fletcher, J.M., Francis, D.J., Boudousquie, A., Copeland, K., Young, V., Kalinowski, S., et al. (2006). Effects of accommodations on high-stakes testing for students with reading disabilities. Exceptional Children, 72(2), 136-150.
5.
Fuchs, L.S., & Fuchs, D. (2001). Helping teachers formulate sound test accommodation decisions for students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 16(3), 174-181.
6.
Guthrie, P. (2006). Section 504 and IDEA: Promoting student access: A resource guide for educators (3rd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Council of Administrators of Special Education.
7.
Kuder, S.J. (2003) Teaching students with language and communication disabilities (2nd ed.). Boston : Allyn & Bacon.
8.
Level playing field. (n.d.). Dictionary.com Unabridged (v. 1.0.1). Retrieved September 14, 2006, from http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=level_playing_field&r=66
9.
Maccini, P., & Gagnon, J.C. (2006). Mathematics instructional practices and assessment accommodations by secondary special and general educators. Exceptional Children, 72(2), 217-234.
10.
National Center on Educational Outcomes (NCEO). (n.d.). NCEO special topic area: Accommodations for students with disabilities. Introduction to accommodations. Retrieved September 15, 2006, from http://www.education.umn.edu/NCEO/TopicAreas/Accommodations/Accomtopic.htm
11.
Odom, S.L., Brantlinger, E., Gersten, E., Horner, R.H., Thompson, B., & Harris, K.R. (2005). Research in special education: Scientific methods and evidence-based practices. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 137-148.
12.
Ofiesh, N.S., Hughes, C., & Scott, S.S. (2004). Extended test time and postsecondary students with learning disabilities: A model for decision making. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 19(1), 57-70.
13.
Patton, M.Q. (1987). How to use qualitative methods in evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Shavelson, R. J., & Towne, L. (Eds.). (2002). Scientific research in education . Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Retrieved January 30, 2007, from http://books.nap.edu
16.
Thompson, S.J., Lazarus, S.S., Thurlow, M.L., & Clapper, A.T. (2005). Topical review 8: The role of accommodations in educational accountability systems. College Park, MD: Institute for the Study of Exceptional Children and Youth.
17.
Thompson, S.J., Morse, A.B., Sharpe, M., & Hall, S. (2005). Accommodations manual: How to select, administer, and evaluate use of accommodations for instruction and assessment of students with disabilities (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers . Retrieved June 22, 2006, from http://osepideasthatwork.org/toolkit/accomodations.asp
18.
Thurlow, M.L., & Bolt, S.E. (2001). Empirical support for accommodations most often allowed in state policy (Synthesis Report 41). Minneapolis : University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.
19.
Thurlow, M.L., Lazarus, S., Thompson, S., & Robey, J. (2002). 2001 state policies on assessment participation and accommodations (Synthesis Report 46). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.
20.
Yin, R.K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21.
Ysseldyke, J., Thurlow, M., Bielinski, J., House, A., Moody, M., & Haigh, J. (2001). The relationship between instructional and assessment accommodations in an inclusive state accountability system. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34(3), 212-220.
