A secondary analysis of the National Longitudinal Transition Study–2 examined the relationship between demographic, disability-related, secondary school preparation, and transition planning variables and receipt of accommodations and other disability-specific services at the postsecondary level for 2,470 postsecondary students with disabilities. The results indicated that secondary students who received transition planning education were more likely to receive accommodations and other disability-specific services in 2-year colleges and that those who had a transition plan that specified postsecondary accommodations and supports as a needed post–high school service were more likely to receive those types of services in 2-year colleges and in career and technical education schools. These findings suggest that secondary schools can influence the likelihood that students will seek out and receive postsecondary accommodations and other disability-specific services.
BarberP. (2012). College students with disabilities: What factors influence successful degree completion? A case study (Disability and work research report). New Brunswick, NJ: John. J. Heldrich Center for Workforce Development.
2.
CaffreyE.FuchsD. (2007). Differences in performance between students with learning disabilities and mild mental retardation: Implications for categorical instruction. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 22, 119–128. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5826.2007.00236.x
3.
CoxD. R. (1970). Analysis of binary data. New York, NY: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
4.
DenhartH. (2008). Deconstructing barriers: Perceptions of students labeled with learning disabilities in higher education. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41, 493–497. doi:10.1177/0022219408321151
5.
DurlakC. M.RoseE.BursuckW. D. (1994). Preparing high school students with learning disabilities for the transition to postsecondary education: Teaching the skills of self-determination. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27, 51–59. doi:10.1177/002221949402700108
6.
FlexerR. W.DavisoA. W.IIIBaerR. M.QueenR. M.MeindlR. S. (2011). An epidemiological model of transition and postschool outcomes. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 34, 83–94. doi:10.1177/0885728810387922
7.
GetzelE. E.ThomaC. A. (2008). Experiences of college students with disabilities and the importance of self-determination in higher education settings. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 31, 77–84.
8.
HitchingsW. E.RetishP.HorvathM. (2005). Academic preparation of adolescents with disabilities for postsecondary education. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 28, 26–35.
9.
JavitzH.WagnerM. (2005). Analysis of potential bias in the Wave 1 and Wave 2 respondents to the National Longitudinal Transition Study–2 (NLTS2). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
10.
KarpM. M.BorkR. H. (2012, July). “They never told me what to expect, so I didn’t know what to do”: Defining and clarifying the role of a community college student (Community College Research Center Working Paper No. 47). New York, NY: Teachers College, Columbia University.
11.
KlassenR. M. (2002). A question of calibration: A review of the self-efficacy beliefs of students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 25, 88–102.
12.
KlassenR. M. (2007). Using predictors to learn about the self-efficacy of early adolescents with and without learning disabilities. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32, 173–187.
13.
KurthN.MellardD. (2006). Student perceptions of the accommodation process in postsecondary education. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 19, 71–84.
14.
LaneK. L.CarterE. W.PiersonM. R.GlaeserB. C. (2006). Academic, social, and behavioral characteristics of high school students with emotional disturbances or learning disabilities. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 14, 108–117.
15.
LeeA. (2011). A comparison of postsecondary science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) enrollment for students with and without disabilities. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 34, 72–82. doi:10.1177/0885728810386591
16.
LightnerK. L.Kipps-VaughanD.SchulteT.TriceA. D. (2012). Reasons university students with a learning disability wait to seek disability services. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 25, 145–159.
17.
LittleR. J. A. (1992). Regression with missing X’s: A review. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 87, 1227–1237. doi:10.2307/2290664
18.
LittleR. J. A.RubinD. B. (2002). Statistical analysis with missing data (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Interscience.
19.
MadausJ. W. (2006). Navigating the college transition maze: A guide for students with learning disabilities. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 37, 32–37.
20.
MamiseishviliK.KochL. (2011). First-to-second year persistence of students with disabilities in postsecondary institutions in the United States. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 54, 93–105. doi:10.1177/0034355210382580
21.
MamiseishviliK.KochL. (2012). Students with disabilities at 2-year institutions in the United States: Factors related to success. Community College Review, 40, 320–339. doi:10.1177/0091552112456281
22.
MandellD.PalmerR. (2005). Differences among states in the identification of autistic spectrum disorders. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 159, 266–269.
23.
MartinJ. E.PortleyJ.GrahamJ. W. (2010). Teaching students with disabilities self-determination skills to equalize access and increase opportunities for postsecondary educational success. In ShawS. F.MadausJ. W.Dukes IIIL. L. (Eds.), Preparing students with disabilities for college success (pp. 65–82). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
24.
MartinJ. M. (2010). Stigma and student mental health in higher education. Higher Education Research and Development, 29, 259–274.
25.
MegivernD. (2002). Disability services and college students with psychiatric disabilities. Journal of Social Work in Disability and Rehabilitation, 1(3), 25–41.
26.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2003, June). The condition of education 2003 (NCES Report 2003-067). Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2003/2003067.pdf
27.
NewmanL. A.MadausJ. W. (2014). Reported accommodations and supports provided to secondary and postsecondary students with disabilities: National perspective. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals. doi:10.1177/2165143413518235
28.
NewmanL.WagnerM.KnokeyA.-M.MarderC.NagleK.ShaverD.. . . SchwartingM. (2011). The post-high school outcomes of young adults with disabilities up to 8 years after high school: A report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study–2 (NLTS2) (NCSER 2011-3005). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
29.
Office for Civil Rights. (2007). Transition of students with disabilities to postsecondary education: A guide for high school educators. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
30.
RoystonP. (2009). Multiple imputation of missing values: Further update of ICE, with an emphasis on categorical variables. Stata Journal, 9, 466–477.
31.
RoystonP.CarlinJ. B.WhiteI. R. (2009). Multiple imputation of missing values: New features for mim. Stata Journal, 9, 252–264.
32.
SalzerM. S.WickL. C.RogersJ. A. (2008). Familiarity with and use of accommodations and supports among postsecondary students with mental illness. Psychiatric Services, 59, 370–375.
33.
ShogrenK. A.KennedyW.DowsettC.Garnier VillarrealM.LittleT. (2014). Exploring essential characteristics of self-determination for diverse students using data from NLTS2. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 37, 168–177. doi:10.1177/2165143413486927
34.
ShogrenK. A.KennedyW.DowsettC.LittleT. (2014). Autonomy, psychological empowerment, and self-realization: Exploring data on self-determination from NLTS2. Exceptional Children, 80, 221–235.
35.
ShogrenK. A.WehmeyerM. L.PalmerS. B.SoukupJ. H.LittleT. D.GarnerN.LawrenceM. (2007). Examining individual and ecological predictors of the self-determination of students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 73, 488–509.
36.
SRI International. (2000). National Longitudinal Transition Study–2 (NLTS2): Study design, timeline, and data collection plan. Menlo Park, CA: Author.
37.
ThompsonB.DiamondK.McWilliamR.SnyderP.SnyderS. (2005). Evaluating the quality of evidence from correlational research for evidence-based practice. Exceptional Children, 71, 181–194.
38.
United States Government Accountability Office. (2009). Higher education and disability: Education needs a coordinated approach to improve its assistance to schools in supporting students (GAO-10-33). Retrieved from http://www.gao.gov/assets/300/297433.pdf
39.
ValdesK.GodardP.WilliamsonC.Van CampenJ.McCrackenM.JonesR. (2013). National Longitudinal Transition Study–2 (NLTS2) Waves 1, 2, 3, 4, & 5 data documentation and dictionary. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International. Retrieved from http://www.nlts2.org/data_dictionary/data_documentation_dictionary.html
40.
WagnerM.MarderC.LevineP.CametoR.CadwalladerT. W.BlackorbyJ.. . . NewmanL. (2003). The individual and household characteristics of youth with disabilities. A report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study–2 (NLTS2). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
41.
WagnerM.NewmanL.CametoR.JavitzH.ValdesK. (2012). A national picture of parent and youth participation in IEP and transition planning meetings. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 23, 140–155. doi:10.1177/1044207311425384
42.
WalkerA. R.TestD. W. (2011). Using a self-advocacy intervention on African American college students’ ability to request academic accommodations. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 26, 134–144.
43.
WehmeyerM. (1995). The Arc’s Self-Determination Scale: Procedural guidelines. Silver Spring, MD: Arc of the United States. Retrieved from http://www.thearc.org/document.doc?id=3671
44.
WehmeyerM. (2000). The Arc’s Self-Determination Scale: Procedural guidelines (Rev. ed.). Silver Spring, MD: Arc of the United States.
45.
WehmeyerM. (2003). A functional theory of self-determination: Definition and categorization. In WehmeyerM.AberyB.MithaugD. E.StancliffeR. (Eds.), Theory in self-determination: Foundations for educational practice (pp. 174–181). Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
46.
WehmeyerM.GarnerN. (2003). The impact of personal characteristics of people with intellectual and developmental disability on self-determination and autonomous functioning. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 16, 255–265.
47.
WhiteI. R.RoystonP.WoodA. M. (2011). Multiple imputation using chained equations: Issues and guidance for practice. Statistics in Medicine, 30, 377–399.
48.
WolaninT. (2005). Students with disabilities: Financial aid policy issues. Journal of Student Financial Aid, 35, 17–26.
