This study evaluated the effectiveness of a multicomponent early literacy curriculum that included phonics and phonemic awareness in comparison to a sight word approach. A total of 93 students with severe developmental disabilities who were enrolled in Grades K through 4 were randomly assigned to either a multicomponent early literacy curriculum or a sight word comparison curriculum. The instructional interventions were implemented over an academic school year. Results indicated that students in the multicomponent early literacy curriculum had significantly higher mean literacy scores than the students in the sight word condition, with small to moderate effect sizes (.30–.49). Further analysis indicated that phonics skills appeared to contribute most to the differences between the two curriculum approaches. Implications for teaching decoding skills, one of the components needed for students to become fully literate, are discussed.
Ahlgrim-DelzellL.BrowderD. M.FlowersC.BakerJ. N. (2008, February). The Nonverbal Literacy Assessment (NVLA). Paper presented at the National Association of School Psychologists, New Orleans, LA.
2.
AllorJ. H.MathesP. G.RobertsJ. K.JonesF. G.ChamplinT. M. (2010). Teaching students with moderate intellectual disabilities to read: An experimental examination of a comprehensive reading intervention. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 45, 3–22.
3.
AustinP.BoekmanK. (1990). Edmark functional word series. Redmond, WA: Edmark.
4.
BakerJ. N.SpoonerF.FlowersC.Ahlgrim-DelzellL.BrowderD. M. (2010). A measure of emergent literacy for students with severe developmental disabilities. Psychology in the Schools, 47, 501–513.
5.
BarudinS. I.HourcadeJ. J. (1990). Relative effectiveness of three methods of reading instruction in developing specific recall and transfer skills in learners with moderate and severe mental retardation. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 25, 286–291.
6.
BraceyS.MaggsA.MorathP. (1975). The effects of a direct phonic approach in teaching reading with six moderately retarded children: Acquisition and mastery learning stages. Slow Learning Child, 22, 83–90.
7.
BradfordS.AlbertoP.HouchinsD. E.ShippenM. E.FloresM. (2006). Using systematic instruction to teach decoding skills to middle schools students with moderate intellectual disabilities. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 41, 333–343.
8.
BrowderD. M.Ahlgrim-DelzellL.CourtadeG.GibbsS. L.FlowersC. (2008). Evaluation of the effectiveness of an early literacy program for students with significant developmental disabilities using group randomized trial research. Exceptional Children, 75, 33–52.
9.
BrowderD. M.Ahlgrim-DelzellL.SpoonerF.MimsP. J.BakerJ. N. (2009). Using time delay to teach literacy to students with severe developmental disabilities. Journal of Special Education, 75, 343–364.
BrowderD. M.TrelaK.JimenezB. (2007). Training teachers to follow a task analysis to engage middle school students with moderate and severe developmental disabilities in grade-appropriate literature. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 22, 206–219.
12.
BrowderD. M.WakemanS.SpoonerF.Ahlgrim-DelzellL.AlgozzineB. (2006). Research on reading for students with significant cognitive disabilities. Exceptional Children, 72, 392–408.
13.
Carrow-WoolfolkE. (1995). Oral and Written Language Scales: Listening Comprehension and Oral Expression. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
14.
CollinsB. C.EvansA.Creech-GallowayC.KarlJ.MillerA. (2007). Comparison of the acquisition and maintenance of teaching functional and core content sight words in special and general education settings. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 22, 220–233.
15.
ConnersF. A. (1992). Reading instruction for students with moderate mental retardation: Review and analysis of research. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 96(6), 577–597.
16.
CoyneM. D.SimmonsD. C.Kame’enuiE. J.StoolmillerM. (2004). Teaching vocabulary during shared storybook readings: An examination of differential effects. Exceptionality, 12, 145–162.
17.
DunnL. M.DunnL. M. (1997). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (3rd ed.). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
FiscusR. S.SchusterJ. W.MorseT. E.CollinsB. C. (2002). Teaching elementary students with cognitive disabilities food preparations skills while embedding instructive feedback in the prompt and consequence event. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 37, 55–69.
20.
GanzJ. B.FloresM. M. (2009). The effectiveness of direct instruction for teaching language to children with autism spectrum disorders: Identifying materials. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 39, 75–83.
21.
GoinL. I.HasselbringT. S. (1996). Simon Sounds It Out [Computer software]. Volo, IL: Don Johnson.
22.
HoogeveenF. R.SmeetsP. M.LancioniG. E. (1989). Teaching moderately mentally retarded children basic reading skills. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 10, 1–18.
23.
HoogeveenF. R.SmeetsP. M.van der HouvenJ. E. (1987). Establishing letter–sound correspondence in children classified as trainable mentally retarded. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 22, 77–84.
JosephL. M.SeeryM. E. (2004). Where is the phonics? A review of the literature on the use of phonetic analysis with students with mental retardation. Remedial and Special Education, 25, 88–94.
27.
JusticeL. M.KaderavekJ. (2002). Using shared storybook reading to promote emergent literacy. Teaching Exceptional Children, 34(4), 8–13.
28.
KaufmanA. S.KaufmanN. L. (1993). Kaufman Adolescent and Adult Intelligence Test. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
29.
KliewerC.BiklenD. (2001). “School’s not really a place for reading”: A research synthesis of the literate lives of students with severe disabilities. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 26, 1–12.
30.
LaneS. D.CritchfieldT. S. (1998). Classification of vowels and consonants by individuals with moderate mental retardation: Development of arbitrary relations via match-to-sample training with compound stimuli. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 31, 21–41.
31.
MathesP.TorgesenJ. (2005). Early Interventions in Reading. Columbus, OH: SRA/McGraw.
32.
MechlingL. C.GastD. L. (2003). Multi-media instruction to teach grocery word associations and store location: A study of generalization. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 38, 62–76.
33.
MimsP. J.BrowderD. M.BakerJ. N.LeeA.SpoonerF. (2009). Increasing comprehension of students with significant intellectual disabilities and visual impairments during shared stories. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 44, 409–420.
National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH Pub. No. 00-4769). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
RehfeldtR. A.LatimoreD.StromerR. (2003). Observational learning and the formation of classes of reading skills by individuals with autism and other developmental disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 24, 333–358.
38.
RohenaE. I.JitendraA. K.BrowderD. M. (2002). Comparison of the effects of Spanish and English constant time delay instruction on sight word reading by Hispanic learners with mental retardation. Journal of Special Education, 36, 169–184.
39.
SchueleC. M.JusticeL. M. (2006, August15). The importance of effect sizes in the interpretation of research. ASHA Leader, 11(10), 14–15, 26–27.
40.
SinghJ.SinghN. N. (1985). Comparison of word-supply and word analysis error-correction procedures on oral reading by mentally retarded children. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 90(1), 64–70.
41.
SinghN. N.SinghJ. (1988). Increasing oral reading proficiency through overcorrection and phonic analysis. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 93(3), 12–19.
42.
SkotkoB. G.KoppenhaverD. A.EricksonK. A. (2004). Parent reading behaviors and communication outcomes in girls with Rett Syndrome. Exceptional Children, 70, 145–166.
43.
TaylorD. B.Ahlgrim-DelzellL.FlowersC. (in press). A qualitative study of teacher perceptions on using an explicit instruction curriculum to teach early reading skills to students with significant developmental disabilities. Reading Psychology.
44.
ThompsonB. (2002). “Statistical,” “practical,” and “clinical”: How many kinds of significance do counselors need to consider?Journal of Counseling and Development, 80, 64–71.
45.
van KleeckA. (2006). A matter of emphasis: Different ways to share books and stories to foster different language and literacy skills. In van KleeckA. (Eds.), Sharing books and stories to promote language and literacy: A volume in the emergent and early literacy series (pp. 3–11). San Diego, CA: Plural.
46.
WechslerD. (1991). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (3rd ed.). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp.
