We used a multiple baseline across word lists design nested within a multiple baseline across participants design to examine the effects of instruction delivered using an iPad® app on sight word fluency and oral reading fluency of six first graders identified as at risk for reading failure. In Study 1, three students participated in teacher-directed iPad® instruction to learn sight words. In Study 2, three other students participated in self-mediated iPad® instruction. We measured sight word fluency and oral reading fluency in both studies; In addition, we measured academic engagement in Study 2. Results showed increases in sight word fluency during the iPad® instruction, but limited gains were seen in oral reading fluency. The three participants in Study 2 consistently achieved high levels of engagement during the iPad® instruction compared with engagement during independent reading time. The benefits of using technology in the classroom and directions for future research are discussed.
BeschornerB.HutchisonA. (2013). iPads as a literacy teaching tool in early childhood. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 1, 16–24.
2.
BlissS.SkinnerC. H.AdamsR. (2006). Enhancing an English language learning fifth-grade student’s sight-word reading with a time-delay taped-words intervention. School Psychology Review, 35, 663–670.
3.
CheungA. C. K.SlavinR. E. (2012). How features of educational technology applications affect student reading outcomes: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 7, 198–215.
4.
Coleman-MartinM.HellerK.CihakD. F.IrvineK. L. (2005). Using computer-assisted instruction and the nonverbal reading approach to teach word identification. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 20, 80–90.
5.
CullenJ.KeeseyS.Alber-MorganS. R.WheatonJ. (2013). The effects of computer-assisted instruction using Kurzweil 3000 on sight word acquisition for students with mild disabilities. Education & Treatment of Children, 36, 87–103.
6.
FryE. B.KressJ. E. (2006). The reading teacher’s book of lists (5th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
7.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD.HospM. K.JenkinsJ. R. (2001). Oral reading fluency as an indicator of reading competence: A theoretical, empirical, and historical analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 239–256.
8.
GoodR. H.KaminskiR. A. (Eds.). (2007). Dynamic indicators of basic early literacy skills (6th ed.). Eugene, OR: Institute for the Development of Educational Achievement.
9.
GreenwoodC. R. (1991). Longitudinal analysis of time, engagement, and achievement in at-risk versus non-risk students. Exceptional Children, 57, 521–535.
HaydonT.HawkinsR.DenuneH. (2012). A comparison of iPads and worksheets on math skills of high school students with emotional disturbance. Behavioral Disorders, 37, 232–243.
12.
HelmanL. A.BurnsM. K. (2008). What does oral language have to do with it? Helping young English-language learners acquire a sight word vocabulary. The Reading Teacher, 62, 14–19.
13.
Hilton-PrillhartA. N.HopkinsM. B.SkinnerC. H.McCane-Bowling, S. J. (2011). Enhancing sight-word reading in second-grade students using a computer-based sight-word reading system. Journal of Evidence-Based Practices for Schools, 12(2), 205–218.
14.
JosephL.EveleighE.KonradM.NeefN.VolpeR. (2012). Comparison of the efficiency of two flashcard drill methods on children’s reading performance. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 28, 317–337.
15.
KazdinA. E. (2011). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
16.
KoureaL.CartledgeG.Musti-RaoS. (2007). Improving the reading skills of urban elementary students through total class peer tutoring. Remedial and Special Education, 28, 95–107.
17.
LaneK. L.Beebe-FrankenbergerM. (2004). School-based interventions: The tools you need to succeed. Boston, MA: Pearson.
18.
LaneK. L.MenziesH. M.MuntonS. M.Von DueringR. M.EnglishG. L. (2005). The effects of a supplemental early literacy program for a student at risk: A case study. Preventing School Failure, 50(1), 21–28.
19.
Martin-ChangS. L.LevyB. A.O’NeilS. (2007). Word acquisition, retention, and transfer: Findings from contextual and isolated word training. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 96, 31–56.
20.
McClanahanB.WilliamsK.KennedyE.TateS. (2012). A breakthrough for Josh: How use of an iPad facilitated reading improvement. TechTrends: Linking Research and Practice to Improve Learning, 56(3), 20–28.
21.
MechlingL.GastD.KrupaK. (2007). Impact of smart board technology: An investigation of sight word reading and observational learning. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37, 1869–1882.
22.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2011). The nation’s report card: Reading 2011 (NCES 2012–457). Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/
23.
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH Publication No. 00–4769). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
24.
NeelyL.RispoliM.CamargoS.DavisH.BolesM. (2013). The effect of instructional use of an iPad® on challenging behavior and academic engagement for two students with autism. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 7, 509–516.
25.
NorthropL.KilleenE. (2013). A framework for using iPads to build early literacy skills. The Reading Teacher, 66, 531–537.
26.
RohenaE. I.JitendraA. K.BrowderD. M. (2002). Comparison of the effects of Spanish and English constant time delay instruction on sight word reading by Hispanic learners with mental retardation. The Journal of Special Education, 36, 169–184.
SwobodaC. M.KratochwillT. R.LevinJ. R. (2010, December). Conservative dual-criterion method for single-case research: A guide for visual analysis of AB, ABAB, and multiple-baseline designs (WCER Working Paper No. 2010-13). Retrieved from http://www.wcer.wisc.edu/publications/workingPapers/papers.php
29.
ThoermerA.WilliamsL. (2012). Using digital texts to promote fluent reading. The Reading Teacher, 65, 441–445.
30.
WangS.SleemanP. J. (1994). The effectiveness of computer-assisted instruction . . . A theoretical explanation. International Journal of Instructional Media, 21, 61–77.
