Upon exiting high school, some African American students with disabilities experience difficulty accessing disability support services and appropriate accommodations. Many of these difficulties in access can be traced to high school transition planning as the source. To understand the underlying transitional barriers and sources of support, case studies were developed to examine the experiences of African American students with disabilities as they secured accommodations from disability services. The following themes resulting from the data were evident within the student portraits: (a) students believed deficit-ideologies undermined attempts at self-determination; (b) students emphasized the importance of adequate information prior to transition; and (c) students often refused to access services due to competing cultural identities. The theoretical frameworks of social and cultural capital were used to explore the transitional experiences of postsecondary African American students with disabilities.
BanksJ.HughesM. (in press). Double consciousness: Postsecondary experiences of African American males with a disability. Journal of Negro Education.
2.
BourdieuP. (1977). Cultural reproduction and social reproduction. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
3.
BourdieuP. (1986). The forms of capital. New York, NY: Greenwood.
4.
BrantlingerE.JimenezR.KlingerJ.PugachM.RichardsonV. (2005). Qualitative studies in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 195–207.
5.
CarterE. W.LaneK. L.PiersonM.StangK. K. (2008). Promoting self-determination for transition-age youth: Views of high school general and special educators. Exceptional Children, 75, 55–70.
6.
ClarkM.ParetteP. (2002). Student athletes with learning disabilities: A model for effective supports. College Student Journal, 36, 47–62.
7.
ColemanJ. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95–121.
8.
CreswellJ. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
9.
DenhartH. (2008). Deconstructing barriers: Perceptions of students labeled with learning disabilities in higher education. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41, 483–497. doi:10.1177/0022219408321151
10.
DunnL. (1968). Special education for mildly retarded—Is much of it justifiable?Exceptional Children, 35, 5–22.
11.
DurodoyeB. A.CombesB. H.BryantR. M. (2004). Counselor intervention in the post-secondary planning of African American students with learning disabilities. Professional School Counseling, 7, 133–140.
12.
DuttaA.Scguri-GeistC.KunduM. (2009). Coordinator of postsecondary transition services for studetns with disability. Journal of Rehabiliation, 75(1), 10–17.
13.
FieldS.HoffmanA. (1996). Steps to self-determination: A curriculum to help adolescents learn to achieve their goals. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
14.
GerberP. J.ReiffH. B.GinsbergR. (1996). Reframing the learning disability experience. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29, 98–101.
15.
GilliganC.BrownL. M. (1992). Meeting at the crossroads. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
16.
HarryB.KlingnerJ. (2006). Why are so many minority students in special education?New York, NY: Teacher College Press.
17.
HeathS. B. (1983). Ways with words. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
18.
HendersonC. (2001). College freshmen with disabilities: A biennial statistical profile. Washington, DC: HEATH Resource Center.
19.
HinkleS. J. (1994). Sports counseling: Helping student-athletes. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED 379 532)
20.
hooksb. (1994). Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. New York, NY: Routledge.
21.
Individuals With Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, Pub. L. No. 108-446 (2004).
22.
JohnsonP. D. (2006). Counseling African American men: A contextualized humanistic perspective. Counseling and Values, 50, 187–196. doi:10.1002/j.2161-007X.2006.tb00055.x
23.
KiyamaJ. M. (2010). College aspirations and limitations: The role of educational ideologies and funds of knowledge in Mexican American families. American Education Research Journal, 47, 330–356. doi:10.3102/0002831209357468
24.
LincolnY. S.GubaE. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
25.
MadausJ. W.ShawS. (2006). Disability services in postsecondary education: Impact of IDEA 2004. Journal of Developmental Education, 30, 12–21.
26.
McDonaldK. E.KeysC. B.BalcazarF. E. (2007). Disability, race/ethnicity and gender: Themes of cultural oppression, acts of individual resistance. American Journal of Community Psychology, 39, 145–161. doi:10.1007/s10464-007-9093-3
27.
MerriamS. (1988). Case study research in education: A qualitative approach. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
28.
MerriamS. (1998). Qualitative research and cases study applications in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
29.
MilnerR. H. (2007). Race, culture, and researcher positionality: Working through dangers seen, unseen, and unforeseen. Educational Researcher, 36, 388–400. doi:10.3102/0013189X07309471
30.
NadelM.WamhoffS.WisemanW. (2003). Disability, welfare reform, and supplementary security income. Social Security Bulletin, 65, 14–30.
31.
NicholasK. R.MenchettiB. M.NettlesS. M. (2005). An exploratory investigation of structured writing strategy training for African American college students with learning disabilities. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 36, 37–59.
32.
PellegrinoA. M.SermonsB. M.ShaverG. W. (2011). Disproportionality among postsecondary students seeking evaluation to document disabilities. Disability Studies Quarterly, 31(2). Retrieved from www.dsq-sds.org/article/view/1588/1556
33.
PetersenA. J. (2009). Ain’t nobody gonna get me down: An examination of the educational experiences of four African American women labeled with disabilities. Equity & Excellence in Education, 42, 428–442. doi:10.1080/10665680903245284
34.
PortesA. (2000). The two meanings of social capital. Sociological Form, 15, 1–12.
35.
QuinnM. M.RutherfordR. B.WolfordB. I.LeoneP. E.NelsonC. M. (2001). The prevalence of youth with disabilities in juvenile and adult corrections: Analysis of a national survey. Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research, National Center on Education, Disability, and Juvenile Justice.
36.
RossmanG. B.RallisS. F. (2003). Learning in the field: An introduction to qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
37.
SachsD.SchreuerN. (2011). Inclusion of students with disabilities in higher education: Performance and participation in student’s experiences. Disability Studies Quarterly, 31(2). Retrieved from http://www.dsq-sds.org/article/view/1593/1561
38.
StakeR. (2005). Multiple case study analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
39.
TrainorA. A. (2002). Self-determination for students with learning disabilities: Is it a universal value?Qualitative Studies in Education, 13, 711–725. doi:10.1080/0951839022000014394
40.
TrainorA. A. (2005). Self-determination perceptions and behaviors of diverse students with LD during the transition planning process. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 233–249. doi:10.1177/00222194050380030501
41.
TrainorA. A. (2008). Using cultural and social capital to improve postsecondary outcomes and expand transition models for youth with disabilities. Journal of Special Education, 42, 148–162. doi:10.1177/0022466907313346
42.
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2002). The condition of education 2002. Washington, DC: Author.
43.
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2010). National postsecondary student aid study. Washington, DC: Author.
44.
U.S. Department of Labor. (2012). Persons with a disability: Labor force characterisitcs. Washington, DC: Author.
45.
WagnerM.NewmanL.CametoR.GarzaN.LevineP. (2005). Changes over time in the early postschool outcomes of youth with disabilities: A report of findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study (NLTS) and National Longitudinal Transition Study-2. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
46.
WalkerA. R.TestD. W. (2011). Using self-advocacy intervention on African American college students’ ability to request academic accommodations. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 26, 134–144.
47.
YinR. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
