Over the past 10 years increasing numbers of charter schools have been considered a viable option for many students seeking to obtain a quality education. Public charter schools and their administrators and teachers are obligated to follow the principles enshrined in federal mandates, such as the Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act. This study examines the capacity of charter school operators to create environments and service delivery models that effectively address the needs of students eligible for special education services via a survey of Wisconsin charter school operators and a content analysis of the applications of independent charter schools. The results indicate that charter operators, particularly those presiding over schools considered their own local education agency, experienced significant challenges with addressing special education in the planning and implementation of their charter schools. Policy implications for the role of charter authorizers are explored.
Ahearn, E., Lange, C., Rhim, L.M., & McLaughlin, M.J. (2001). Project SEARCH: Special education as requirements in charter schools. Final report of a research study. Alexandria, VA: National Association of State Directors of Special Education. Retrieved April 26, 2007, from http://www.education.umd.edu/EDSP/Projectintersect
2.
Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq.Babbie, E.R. (2004). Basics of social research (3rd ed.). Portland, OR: Wadsworth .
3.
Bulkey, K., & Fisler, J. ( 2002). A review of the research on charter schools. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
4.
Carnoy, M., Johnson, R., Mishel, L., & Rothstein, R. ( 2005). The charter school dust up: Examining the evidence on enrollment and achievement. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.
5.
Estes, M.B. ( 2004). Charter schools and students with special needs: How well do they mix? Education and Treatment of Children, 23(3), 369-375.
6.
Etscheidt, S. ( 2005). Vouchers and students with disabilities: A multidimensional analysis. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 16(3), 156-168.
7.
Frattura, E.M., & Capper, C.A. ( 2007). Leading for social justice: Transforming schools for all learners. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
8.
Giovannetti, B., & Lange, C. ( 2006, November). The legal status of charter schools. Plenary address at the Third National Summit on Successfully Serving Students with Disabilities in Charter Schools, Indianapolis, IN .
9.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 2004, Pub. L. No. 108-446, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq.
10.
Jackson, T. ( 2003). Charter schools: Research on special education proceedings document (Prepared for the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs). Alexandria, VA: National Association of State Directors of Special Education, Project Forum .
11.
Lake, R. J., & Hill, P. T. (Eds.). (2005). Hopes, fears, and reality: A balanced look at American charter schools in 2005. Seattle : University of Washington, Center on Reinventing Public Education, National Charter School Research Project. Retrieved December 4, 2005, from http://www.crpe.org/cs/crpe/view/csr_pubs/3
12.
Lange, C.M. ( 1997). Charter schools and special education: A handbook. Alexandria, VA: National Association of State Directors of Special Education.
13.
Liethwood, K., Louis, K.S., Anderson, S., & Wahlstrom, K. ( 2004). How leadership influences student learning: Review of the research. New York: Wallace Foundation. Retrieved December 7, 2005, from http://www.wallacefoundation.org/KnowledgeCenter/KnowledgeTopics/CurrentAreasofFocus/EducationLeadership/Pages/HowLeadershipInfluencesStudentLearning.aspx
14.
McLaughlin, M.J., & Henderson, K. ( 1998). Charter schools in Colorado and their response to the education of students with disabilities. Journal of Special Education, 32(2), 99-107.
15.
Palmer, L.B., & Gau, R. ( 2005). Charter school authorizing: Policy implications from a national study. Phi Delta Kappan, 86(5), 352-357.
16.
Ramanathan, A.K., & Zollers, N.J. ( 1999). For-profit schools continue to skimp on special education . Phi Delta Kappan, 81(4), 284-291.
17.
Rhim, L.M. ( 2001). Special education in American charter schools: State level policy, practices and tensions. Cambridge Journal of Education, 31(3), 373-383.
18.
Rhim, L.M. ( 2007a). Navigating special education in charter schools part I: Understanding legal roles and responsibilities. Chicago : National Association of Charter School Authorizers . Retrieved December 3, 2007, from http://www.qualitycharters.org/files/public/IssueBriefNo14.pdf
19.
Rhim, L.M. ( 2007b). Navigating special education in charter schools part II: The authorizer’s role in ensuring quality special education programs . Chicago: National Association of Charter School Authorizers. Retrieved December 17, 2007 , from http://www.qualitycharters.org/files/public/IssueBriefNo14.pdf
20.
Rhim, L.R., Ahearn, E., & McLaughlin, M. (2007). Project Intersect research report #6: Survey of charter school authorizers. College Park: University of Maryland. Retrieved January 2, 2008, from http://www.education.umd.edu/EDSP/Projectintersect
21.
Rhim, L.M., Lange, C.M., Ahearn, E.M., & McLaughlin, M.J. (2005). Project Intersect research report #3: Survey of state charter school officials. College Park: University of Maryland. Retrieved July 15, 2006, from http://www.education.umd.edu/EDSP/Projectintersect
22.
Rhim, L.M., Lange, C.M., Ahearn, E.M., & McLaughlin, M.J. (2007). Project Intersect research report #7: Survey of charter school operators. College Park: University of Maryland. Retrieved March 28, 2008, from http://www.education.umd.edu/EDSP/Projectintersect
23.
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2007). The condition of education 2007 (NCES 2007- 064). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
24.
Vanourek, G. ( 2005). State of the charter school movement 2005: Trends, issues and indicators. Washington, DC: Charter School Leadership Council.
25.
Warren, S.H., Ahearn, E.M., Givannetti, E.A., Lange, C.M., & Rhim, L.M. ( 2004). Primer for charter school operators: Special education requirements and including students with disabilities in charter schools. Alexandria, VA: National Association of State Directors of Special Education. Retrieved April 2, 2006, from http://www.uscharterschools.org/cs/spedp/print/uscs_docs/spedp/home.htm
26.
Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction. ( 2006). Wisconsin charter schools yearbook 2005-2006. Retrieved July 25, 2006, from http://dpi.wi.gov/sms/pdf/2005-06yearbook.pdf
27.
Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction. ( 2007). 2007-2008 enrollment for independent public charter schools . Retrieved May 15, 2008, from http://dpi.wi.gov/sms/xls/0708enrl.htm
28.
Witte, J.F., Weimer, D.L., Schlomer, P.A., & Shober, A.F. ( 2004). The performance of charter schools in Wisconsin. Madison: University of Wisconsin-Madison.
29.
Ziebarth, T., Celio, M.B., Lake, R.J., & Rainey, L. ( 2005). The charter schools landscape in 2005. In R. J. Lake & P. T. Hill (Eds.), Hopes, fears, and reality: A balanced look at American charter schools in 2005 (pp. 1-20). Seattle: University of Washington, National Charter School Research Project. Retrieved December 4, 2005, from http://www.crpe.org/cs/crpe/view/csr_pubs/3
