Fifteen years after the first charter school legislation was passed, the number of charter schools opening in the United States each year continues to grow. In 2000, research was conducted to examine the extent and quality of service to students with disabilities in Texas's charter schools. Descriptive statistics and structured interviews were used to identify areas of strength and weakness in special education service provision. This article describes a replication of that study, reviews the initial findings, and presents data that shed light on changes that have occurred in the interim.
Bracey, G. (2005a). Checking up on charters. Phi Delta Kappan, 86(7), 554-555. Retrieved March 21, 2007, from Academic Search Premier database.
2.
Bracey, G. (2005b, January 4). Data point to failure. USA Today, p. 14a. Retrieved September 30, 2006, from Academic Search Premier database.
3.
Center for Education Reform. (2006). Charter schools number nearly 4,000 nationwide. Retrieved October 1, 2006, from http://www.edreform.com/index.cfm?fuseAction=document&documentID=2497§ionID=5&NEWSYEAR=2006
4.
Center for Effective Collaboration and Practice. (n.d) Schools and special education. Retrieved January 15, 2000, from http://cecp.air.org/schools_special.asp
Cook, G. (2006, October). Federal study adds fuel to charter school debate. American School Board Journal, p. 6.
7.
Cookson, P.W. (1994). School choice: The struggle for the soul of American education. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
8.
Davis, C. (2005). Restrictiveness and race in special education: Access to a special education infrastructure. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 3(1), 57-63.
9.
Deller, M. (2006, August 4). Struggling charter schools in jeopardy . Fort Worth Star-Telegram. Retrieved August 14, 2006, from http://www.dfw.com/mld/dfw/news/local/15197577.htm
10.
Detrick, R., Phillips, R., & Durrett, D. (2002). Critical issue: Dynamic debate-Determining the evolving impact of charter schools. Naperville, IL: North Central Regional Education Laboratory. Retrieved May 16, 2006, from http://www.ncrel.org/sdrs/areas/issues/envrnmnt/go/go800.htm
11.
Downing, J.E., Spencer, S., & Cavallaro, C. (2004). The development of an inclusive charter elementary school: Lessons learned. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 29(1), 11-24.
Estes, M.B. (2000). Charter schools and students with special needs: How well do they mix? Education and Treatment of Children , 23, 369-381.
14.
Estes, M.B. (2001). Choice for all? Charter schools and students with disabilities (Doctoral dissertation, University of North Texas, 2001). Digital Dissertations. (AAT 3065575)
15.
Estes, M.B. (2003). Charting the course of special education in Texas' charter schools. Education and Treatment of Children, 26(4), 452-466.
16.
Estes, M.B. (2004). Choice for all? Charter schools and students with special needs. Journal of Special Education, 37(4), 257-267.
17.
Estes, M.B. (2006). Charter schools: Do they work for troubled students ? Preventing School Failure, 51(1), 55-61.
18.
Fierros, E.G., & Blomberg, N.A. (2005). Restrictiveness and race in special education placements in for-profit and non-profit charter schools in California. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal , 3(1), 1-16.
19.
Finn, C.E., Bierlein, L.A., & Manno, B.V. (1996). Finding the right fit: America's charter schools get started. Brookings Review, 14(3), 18-21.
20.
Fiore, T.A., Harwell, L.A., Blackorby, J., & Finnigan, L.A. (2000). Charter schools and students with disabilities: A national study. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement .
21.
Gall, M.D., Borg, W.R., & Gall, J.P. (1996). Educational research: An introduction (6th ed.). White Plains, NY: Longman.
22.
Glesne, C. (1999). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction (2nd ed.). New York: Longman.
23.
Grant, P.A. (2005). Restrictiveness and race in special education: Educating all learners. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 3(1), 70-74.
24.
Greifner, L. (2006). Charter schools. Education Week , 26(1), 19.
25.
Henig, J.R. (1999). School choice outcomes. In S. D. Sugarman & F. R. Kemerer (Eds.), School choice and social controversy: Politics, policy and law (pp. 68-107). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
26.
Honawar, V. (2004). Charter schools. Education Week, 24(11), 9. Howe, K. R., & Welner, K. G. (2002). School choice and the pressure to perform: Deja vu for children with disabilities? Remedial and Special Education, 23(4), 212-221.
27.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. (2004).
28.
Jacobowitz, R., & Gyurko, J.S. (2004). Charter school funding in New York: Perspectives on parity with traditional public schools. New York: New York University, Institute for Education and Social Policy. Retrieved September 21, 2006, from Academic Search Premier database.
29.
Kolderie, T. (1990). Beyond choice to new public schools: Withdrawing the exclusive franchise in public education. Washington, DC: Progressive Policy Institute. Retrieved May 17, 2007, from www.ppionline.org/ppi_ci.cfm?contentid=676&knlg AreaID=110&subsecid=134
30.
Le, C. (2006, March 3). Selective admission makes charter too elite, critics say: School leaders say gifted students deserve a program, too. Delaware Online: The News Journal. Available from http://www.delawareonline.com
31.
Levin, B. (1999). Race and school choice. In S. D. Sugarman & F. R. Kemerer (Eds.), School choice and social controversy: Politics, policy and law (pp. 266-299). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
32.
Little, D., Roberts, G., Ward, D., Bianchi, A., & Metheny, M. (2003). Charter schools: Investment in innovation or funding folly? Latham, NY: New York State School Boards Association. Retrieved September 25, 2006, from Academic Search Premier database.
33.
Mahoney, C. (1997). Common qualitative methods. In J. Frechtling & L. Sharp (Eds.), User-friendly handbook for mixed method evaluations . Rockville, MD: Westat. Retrieved March 21, 2007, from http://www.ehr.nsf.gov/EHR/REC/pubs/NSF97-153/CHAP_3.HTM
34.
Morken, H., & Formicola, J.R. (1999). The politics of school choice. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
35.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, 20 U.S.C. 70 § 6301 et seq. (2002). Rhim, L. M., Ahearn, E. M., & Lange, C. (2007). Charter school statutes and special education: Policy answers or policy ambiguity? Journal of Special Education, 41(1), 50-63.
36.
Rhim, L.M., Ahearn, E.M., Lange, C., & McLaughlin, M.J. (2006). Project intersect: Studying special education in charter schools: Research Report 4. Charter schools' special education infrastructures. College Park, MD: Institute for the Study of Exceptional Children and Youth. Retrieved March 21, 2007, from http:www.education.umd.edu/EDSP/ProjectIntersect/docs/InfrasRptoct06.pdf
37.
Rhim, L.M., & McLaughlin, M.J. (1999, March). Charter schools and special education: Balancing disparate visions. Paper presented at the second annual national Charter School Conference, Denver, CO. Retrieved January 12, 2006, from http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2/content_storage_01/0000000b/80/22/5f/d6.pdf
38.
Rogers, C.M. (2003). School choice and students with disabilities: Perspectives of parents with children enrolled in Edison Schools (Doctoral dissertation, University of Kansas, 2003). Dissertation Abstracts International, 65/04, 1320.
39.
Rudebusch, J. (2003). Analysis of special education compliance and special education funding in four Texas open-enrollment charter schools (Doctoral dissertation, University of North Texas, 2004). Dissertation Abstracts International, 64/12, 4303.
40.
Shields, R. (2005). Texas charter schools and students with disabilities: Parental perceptions of the phenomenon (Doctoral dissertation, University of Texas at Austin, 2005). Dissertation Abstracts International , 66/07, 2544.
41.
State Board of Education. (2004). Open-enrollment charter guidelines and application: Procedures and application: Eleventh generation open-enrollment charter. Austin, TX : Author.
42.
Texas Education Agency. (2000). PEIMS: Public Education Information Management System. Austin, TX: Author.
43.
Texas Education Agency. (2004). Texas Education Code. Austin, TX: Author. Retrieved August 14, 2006, from http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/statutes/edtoc.html
44.
Texas Education Agency. (2005). PEIMS: Public Education Information Management System. Austin, TX: Author.
45.
U.S. Department of Education. (1997). A study of charter schools: First-year report-May 1997: Chapter III, The students . Retrieved April 5, 2000, from http://www.ed.gov/pubs/charter
46.
U.S. Department of Education. (n.d.). Questions and answers on No Child Left Behind: Charter schools. Retrieved May 15, 2006, from http://www.ed.gov/nclb/choice/charter/charter-faq.html
47.
Welner, K.G., & Howe, K.R. (2005). Steering toward separation: The evidence and implications of special education students' exclusion from choice schools. In J. Scott (Ed.), School choice and diversity (pp. 93-111). New York: Teachers College Press.
