Sixty-one normally achieving and at-risk fifth-grade students (of whom three had learning disabilities), in three classrooms, were taught two 5-week science units via experimental or control conditions in which treatment order and unit of instruction were counterbalanced. In the control condition, students received typical instruction, with teacher lecture and discussion, textbook reading, and worksheet exercise completion. In the experimental condition, students received differentiated curriculum enhancements, in which multitiered activities were undertaken by students in a classwide peer tutoring format. Analysis of gain score data revealed that students scored higher on production tests, but not identification tests, when in the experimental condition. Student and teacher reports indicated a high degree of satisfaction with experimental methods and materials.
Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L., Thompson, A., Svenson, E., Yen, L., Al-Otaiba, S., et al. (2001). Peer-assisted learning strategies in reading: Extensions for kindergarten, first grade, and high school. Remedial and Special Education, 20, 309-318.
4.
Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., & Kazdan, S. ( 1999). Effects of peer-assisted learning strategies on high school students with serious reading problems. Remedial and Special Education, 20, 309-318.
5.
Gardner, R., Cartledge, G., Seidl, B., Woolsey, M.L., Schley, G.S., & Utley, C.A. ( 2001). Mt. Olivet after-school program: Peer-mediated interventions for at-risk students. Remedial and Special Education, 22, 22-33.
6.
Gest, S.D., & Gest, J.M. ( 2005). Reading tutoring for students at academic and behavioral risk: Effects of time on task in the classroom. Education and Treatment of Children, 28, 25-47.
Joyce, B.R., Weil, M., & Calhoun, E. ( 2004). Models of teaching (7th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
9.
Keislar, E.R., & Stern, C. ( 1970). Differentiated instruction in problem solving for children of different mental ability levels. Journal of Educational Psychology, 61, 445-450.
10.
Kourea, L., Cartledge, G., & Musti-Rao, S. ( 2007). Improving the reading skills of urban elementary students through total class peer tutoring. Remedial and Special Education , 28, 95-107.
11.
Maheady, L., Harper, G.F., & Mallette, B. ( 2001). Peer-mediated instruction and interventions and students with mild disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 22, 4-14.
12.
Maheady, L., Sacca, M.K., & Harper, G.F. ( 1988). Classwide peer tutoring with mildly handicapped high school students. Exceptional Children, 55, 52-59.
13.
Mastropieri, M.A., & Scruggs, T.E. ( 2007). The inclusive classroom: Strategies for effective instruction (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
14.
Mastropieri, M.A., Scruggs, T.E., Berkeley, S., & Graetz, J. ( 2007, April). The effectiveness of special education for secondary content area learning: A meta-analysis. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
15.
Mastropieri, M.A., Scruggs, T.E., & Graetz, J. ( 2005). Cognition and learning in inclusive high school chemistry classes. In T. E. Scruggs & M. A. Mastropieri (Eds.), Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities: Vol. 18. Cognition and learning in diverse settings (pp. 107-118). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
16.
Mastropieri, M.A., Scruggs, T.E., & Marshak, L. ( 2008). Training teachers, parents, and peers to implement effective teaching strategies for content area learning. In T. E. Scruggs & M. A. Mastropieri (Eds.), Personnel preparation: Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities (vol. 21, pp. 311-329). Bingley, UK: Emerald .
17.
Mastropieri, M.A., Scruggs, T.E., Mohler, L.J., Beranek, M.L., Spencer, V., Boon, R.T., & Talbott, E. ( 2001). Can middle school students with serious reading difficulties help each other and learn anything? Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 16, 18-27.
18.
Mastropieri, M.A., Scruggs, T.E., Norland, J., Berkeley, S., McDuffie, K., Tornquist, E.H., & Conners, N. ( 2006). Differentiated curriculum enhancement in inclusive middle school science: Effects on classroom and high-stakes tests. Journal of Special Education, 40, 130-137.
19.
Mastropieri, M.A., Scruggs, T.E., Spencer, V., & Fontana, J. ( 2003). Promoting success in high school world history: Peer tutoring versus guided notes. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 52-65.
20.
Scruggs, T.E., Mastropieri, M.A., & McDuffie, K.A. (2007). Co-teaching in inclusive classrooms: A meta-synthesis of qualitative research. Exceptional Children, 73, 392-416.
21.
Spencer, V., Scruggs, T.E., & Mastropieri, M.A. (2003). Content area learning in middle school social studies classrooms and students with emotional or behavioral disorders: A comparison of strategies. Behavioral Disorders , 28, 77-93.
22.
Tomlinson, C.A. ( 2001). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners (2nd ed.). Arlington, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development .
23.
Weaver, J. ( 1954). Differentiated instruction in arithmetic: An overview and a promising trend. Education, 74, 300-305.
24.
Whitehurst, G.J. ( 2004, March). Research on science education. Paper presented at the Secretary’s Summit on Science, U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC. Retrieved June 4, 2008, from http://www.ed.gov/rschstat/research/progs/mathscience/whitehurst04/edlite-slide023.html
