This study reports the results of a peer-mediated intervention, total class peer tutoring, on the academic performance of six urban students at risk for reading failure. A multiple baseline design across subjects was used to evaluate the effects of this intervention. The results showed that five of the six students significantly increased their sight-word acquisition and maintenance. All target students' reading fluency and comprehension scores on the standardized Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS) Oral Reading Fluency (DORF) passages were higher during intervention than at baseline. Greater fluency gains were shown on constructed paragraphs that included the tutoring sight words. More modest fluency and comprehension gains were found in DORF passages that did not contain words taught in the intervention. Social validity measures taken from teachers, parents, and students revealed positive evaluations of the intervention. Limitations, future directions in research, and practical implications are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Al-Hassan, S. (2003). Reciprocal peer tutoring e fect on high frequency sight word learning, retention, and generalization of first- and second-grade urban elementary school students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University, Columbus.
2.
Arreaga-Mayer, C. (1998). Increasing active student responding and improving academic performance through classwide peer tutoring. Intervention in School and Clinic, 34, 89—95.
3.
Baer, D.M., Wolf, M.M., & Risley, T.R. (1968). Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis . Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 91—97.
4.
Barbetta, P.M., Miller, A.D., Peters, M.T., Heron, T.E., & Cochran, L.L. (1991). TUGMATE: A cross-age tutoring program to teach sight vocabulary. Education and Treatment of Children, 14, 19—37.
5.
Brady, N.C. (1997). The teaching game: A reciprocal peer tutoring program for preschool children. Education and Treatment of Children, 20, 123— 149.
6.
Butler, F.M. (1999). Reading Partners: Students can help each other learn to read!Education and Treatment of Children, 22, 415—426.
7.
Cartledge, G. (2002). Issues of disproportionality for African American learners. In L. Bullock & R. A. Gables (Eds.), Culturally and linguistically diverse students with behavioral disorders (pp. 15—24). Arlington, VA: Council for Children with Behavioral Disorders.
8.
Cooke, N.L., Heron, T.E., & Heward, W.L. (1983). Peer tutoring: Implementing classwide programs in the primary grades. Columbus, OH: Special Press.
Delquadri, J.C., Greenwood, C.R., Stretton, K., & Hall, V.R. (1983). The Peer Tutoring Spelling Game: A classroom procedure for increasing opportunity to respond and spelling performance. Education and Treatment of Children, 6, 225—239.
11.
DuPaul, G.J., & Henningson, P.N. (1993). Peer tutoring effects on the classroom performance of children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. School Psychology Review, 22, 134—142.
12.
Fantuzzo, J.W., Riggio, R.E., Connelly, S., & Dimeff, L.A. (1989). Effects of reciprocal peer tutoring on academic achievement and psychological adjustment: A component analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 173—177.
13.
Ferri, B.A., & Connor, D.J. (2005). In the shadow of Brown: Special education and overrepresentation of students of color. Remedial and Special Education, 26, 93—100.
14.
Giesecke, D., & Cartledge, G. (1993). Low-achieving students as successful cross-age tutors. Preventing School Failure, 37(3), 34—43.
15.
Good, R. H., & Kaminski, R. A. (Eds.). (2002). Dynamic indicators of basic early literacy skills (6th ed.). Eugene, OR: Institute for the Development of Educational Achievement. Retrieved October 10, 2003, from http://dibels.uoregon.edu
16.
Gottlieb, J., Alter, M., Gottlieb, B.W., & Wishner, J. (1994). Special education in urban America: It's not justifiable for many. The Journal of Special Education, 27, 453—465.
17.
Grant, P.L. (1979). The cloze procedure as an instructional device . Journal of Reading, 22, 699—705.
18.
Greenwood, C.R., Arreaga-Mayer, C., Utley, C.A., Gavin, K.M., & Terry, B.J. (2001). Classwide peer tutoring learning management system: Applications with elementary-level English language learners. Remedial and Special Education, 22, 34—47.
19.
Greenwood, C.R., & Delquadri, J. (1995). Classwide peer tutoring and the prevention of school failure. Preventing School Failure, 39(4), 21—25.
20.
Heron, T.E., Heward, W.L., Cooke, N.L., & Hill, D.S. (1983). Evaluation of a classwide peer tutoring system: First graders teach each other sight words. Education and Treatment of Children, 6, 137—152.
21.
Heron, T.E., Welsch, R.G., & Goddard, Y.L. (2003). Applications of tutoring systems in specialized subject areas: An analysis of skills, methodologies, and results. Remedial and Special Education, 24, 288—300.
22.
Heward, W.L., Heron, T.E., & Cooke, N.L. (1982). Tutor huddle: Key element in a classwide peer tutoring system. The Elementary School Journal, 83, 114—123.
23.
Kazdin, A.E. (1977). Artifact, bias, and complexity of assessment: The ABCs of reliability. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis , 10, 141—150.
24.
Kamps, D.M., Barbetta, P.M., Leonard, B.R., & Delquadri, J. (1994). Classwide peer tutoring: An integration strategy to improve reading skills and promote peer interactions among students with autism and general education peers. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 49— 61.
25.
Lazerson, D.B. (1980). “I must be good if I can teach!”—Peer tutoring with aggressive and withdrawn children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 13(3), 43—48.
26.
Lo, Y., & Cartledge, G. (2004). Total class peer tutoring and interdependent group oriented contingency: Improving the academic and task related behaviors of fourth-grade urban students. Education and Treatment ofExceptional Children, 27, 235—262.
27.
Lowe, A.J., & Follman, J. (1974). Comparison of the Dolch list with other word lists. ReadingTeacher, 28(1), 40-44.
28.
Maheady, L., & Harper, G.F. (1987). A class-wide peer tutoring program to improve the spelling test performance of low-income, third- and fourth-grade students . Education and Treatment of Children, 10, 120—133.
29.
Maheady, L., Sacca, M.K., & Harper, G.F. (1987). Classwide student tutoring teams: The effects of peer-mediated instruction on the academic performance of secondary mainstreamed students. The Journal of Special Education, 21, 107—121.
30.
McDonnell, J., Mathot-Buckner, C., Thorson, N., & Fister, S. (2001). Supporting the inclusion of students with moderate and severe disabilities in junior high school general education classes: The effects of classwide peer tutoring, multi-element curriculum, and accommodations. Education and Treatment ofExceptional Children, 24, 141—160.
31.
Miller, L.J., & Kohler, F.W. (1993). Winning with peer tutoring. Preventing School Failure, 37(3), 14—19.
32.
Miller, A.D., Barbetta, P.M., & Heron, T.E. (1994). START tutoring: Designing, training, implementing, adapting, and evaluating tutoring programs for school and home settings. In R. Gardner III, D. M. Sainato, J. O. Cooper, T. E. Heron, W. L. Heward, J. Eshleman, et al. (Eds.), Behavior analysis in education: Focus on measurably superior instruction (pp. 265—282). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole .
33.
Nazzal, A. (2002). Peer tutoring and at-risk students: An exploratory study. Action in Teacher Education, 24(1), 68—80.
34.
Simmons, D.C., Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L.S., Hodge, J.P., & Mathes, P.G. (1994). Importance of instructional complexity and role reciprocity to classwide peer tutoring. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 9, 203—212.
35.
Woodcock, R.W., McGrew, K.S., & Mather, N. (2001). Examiner's manual: Woodcock-Johnson—III Tests of Achievement. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
36.
Wright, J., Cavanaugh, R.A., Sainato, D.M., & Heward, W.L. (1995). Somos todos ayudantes y estudiantes: A demonstration of a classwide peer tutoring program in a modified Spanish class for secondary students identified as learning disabled or academically at-risk. Education and Treatment of Children, 18, 33—52.
