A commonly attempted approach to modifying attitudes regarding people with disabilities is to place people without disabilities in situations that are designed for them to experience what it is like to have a disability. This approach, called disability simulation, continues despite criticisms including a reported lack of effectiveness data and the potential for negative experiences among participants. The current study examined 41 studies dealing with disability simulation and included 10 studies in a meta-analysis. Results showed an overall median effect size of .04 and a weighted median effect size of .17. Moderator variable weighted effect sizes ranged from .00 to .35. Thus, the data did not suggest that disability simulation was an effective practice, but few negative effects were noted. Suggestions for practice and future research are included.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
References marked with an asterisk indicate studies included in the meta-analysis.
2.
Ballard, M., Corman, L., Gottlieb, J., & Kaufman, M.J. (1977). Improving the social status of mainstreamed retarded children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, 605—611.
3.
Barco, P. (2004, September). Students learn to deal with disabilities. Central Michigan Life. Retrieved July 15, 2004, from http://www.cm-life.com/vnews/display.v/ART/2003/09/24/3f71253005326?in_archive=1
4.
Behler, G.T. (1993). Disability simulations as a teaching tool: Some ethical issues and implications. Journal of Postsecondary Education andDisability, 10(2), 3—8.
5.
Bowe, F. (2005). Making inclusion work. Upper Saddle River, NJ: MerrillPrentice Hall.
6.
*Clore, G.L., & McMillan, J.K. (1971). Emotional role playing, attitude change, and attraction toward a disabled person. Paper presented at the Midwestern Psychological Association Convention, Detroit, Michigan. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED050393)
7.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
8.
Cooper, H.M., Valentine, J.C., & Charlton, K. (2000). The methodology of meta-analysis. In R. Gersten, E. P. Schiller , & S. Vaughn (Eds.), Contemporary special education research: Syntheses of the knowledge base on critical instructional issues (pp. 263—280). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
9.
Diamond, K.E., & Carpenter, E.S. (2000). Participation in inclusive preschool programs and sensitivity to the needs of others. Journal of Early Intervention, 23(2), 81—91.
10.
Diamond, K.E., Hestenes, L.L., Carpenter, E.S., & Innes, F.K. (1997). Relationships between enrollment in an inclusive class and preschool children's ideas about people with disabilities. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 17, 520—536.
11.
Eichinger, J., Rizzo, T.L., & Sirotnik, B.W. (1992). Attributes related to attitudes toward people with disabilities. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue Internationale de Recherches de Readaptation, 15, 53—56.
12.
*Eiring, K.M. (1996). E fects of disability simulation on attitudes (Doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin). Dissertation Abstracts International, 57, 1499.
13.
Elliot, T.R., MacNair, R.R., Yoder, B., & Byrne, C.A. (1991). Interpersonal behavior moderates kindness norm effects on cognitive and affective reactions to physical disability. Rehabilitation Psychology, 36, 57—66.
14.
*Evans, J.H. (1976). Changing attitudes towards disabled peers: An experimental study. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 19, 172—179.
15.
*Fiedler, C.R., & Simpson, R. (1987). Modifying the attitudes of non-handicapped high school students toward handicapped peers. Exceptional Children , 53, 342—349.
16.
Friend, M., & Bursuck, W.D. (2002). Including students with special needs: A practical guide for classroom teachers (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
17.
French, S. (1996). Simulation exercises in disability awareness training: A critique. In G. Hales (Ed.), Beyond disability: Towards an enabling society (pp. 114—123). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18.
Gerber, P. (1992). Personal perspective, at first glance: Employment for people with learning disabilities at the beginning of the ADA era. Learning Disability Quarterly, 15, 330—332.
19.
Gouvier, W.D., Coon, R.C., Todd, M.E., & Fuller, K.H. (1994). Verbal interactions with individuals presenting with and without physical disability. Rehabilitation Psychology , 39, 263—268.
20.
Hahn, H. (1995). New trends in disability studies: Implications for educational policy. Bulletin of the National Center on Educational Restructuring and Inclusion, 2, 2—7.
Hazzard, A. (1983). Children's experience with, knowledge of, and attitude toward disabled persons. The Journal of Special Education , 17, 131— 139.
23.
Hedges, L. (1982). Estimation of effect size from series of independent experiments. Psychological Bulletin,92, 490—499.
24.
*Houston, L. (1991). The e fect of task di ficulty level in disability simulation (Doctoral dissertation, Oklahoma State University). Dissertation Abstracts International, 51, 5029.
25.
Hunt, P., & Goetz, L. (1997). Research on inclusive educational programs, practices, and outcomes for students with severe disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 31, 3—29.
26.
Kavale, K.A., & Forness, S.R. (2000). Policy decisions in special education: The role of meta-analysis. In R. Gersten, E. P. Schiller, & S. Vaughn (Eds.), Contemporary special education research: Syntheses of the knowledge base on critical instructional issues (pp. 281—326). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
27.
Kiger, G. (1992). Disability simulations: Logical, methodological and ethical issues. Disability, Handicap & Society, 7, 71—78.
28.
*Kologinsky, E.F. (1982). An evaluation of an intervention designed to increase children's acceptance of physically handicapped peers (Doctoral dissertation, State University of New York). Dissertation Abstracts International , 42, 5088.
29.
Lectures, simulations to probe disability issues during October. ( 2001, September). UW-L News. Retrieved September 7, 2004, from http://perth.uwlax.edu/Advancement/Connectx/01-issues/sept24/disability-series.htm
30.
*McGowan, J.P. (1999). The e fects of disability simulations on attitudes toward persons with disabilities. (Doctoral dissertation, Seton Hall University) . Dissertation Abstracts International, 60, 1351.
31.
Ohio State programs raise awareness of disability issues. ( 2000, March). Ohio State News. Retrieved September 7, 2004, from http://www.osu.edu/osu/newsrel/Archive/00-03-31_Programs_Raise_Awareness_of_Disability_Issues.html
32.
Pfeiffer, D. (1989). Disability simulation using a wheelchair exercise. Journal of Postsecondary Education andDisability, 7, 53—60.
33.
Price, L., & Gerber, P.J. (2001). At second glance: Employers and employees with learning disabilities in the Americans with Disabilities Act era. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 202—210.
34.
Price, L., Gerber, P.J., & Mulligan, R. (2003). The Americans with Disabilities Act and adults with learning disabilities as employees: The realities of the workplace. Remedial and Special Education, 24, 350—358.
35.
*Raines, S.R. (1987). Perceptual and emotional e fects of assuming a disability. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the New England Educational Research Organization, New York. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED292283)
36.
Rosenthal, R. (1991). Meta-analytic procedures for social research (rev. ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
37.
Rosenthal, R., & Rubin, D. (1982). Comparing effect sizes of independent studies . Psychological Bulletin,92, 500—504.
Salend, S.J. (2005). Creating inclusive classrooms: E fective and reflective practices for all students (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: PearsonMerrillPrentice Hall.
40.
Sandler, A., & Robinson, R. (1981). Public attitudes and community acceptance of mentally retarded persons: A review. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 16, 97—103.
41.
Shaver, J.P., Curtis, C.K., Jesunathadas, J., & Strong, C.J. (1989). The modification of attitudes toward persons with disabilities: Is there a best way?International Journal of Special Education, 4, 33—57.
42.
Smart, J. (2001). Disability, society, and the individual. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
43.
Stephens, K.K., & Clark, D.W. (1987). A pilot study of the effects of visible physical stigma on personal space. Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling, 18, 52—54.
44.
Stevens, R.J., & Slavin, R.E. (1995). The cooperative elementary school: Effects on students' achievement, attitudes, and social relations. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 321—351.
45.
U.S. Department of Education. (2002). Twenty-fourth annual report to congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
46.
Weiss, C.H. (1998). Program evaluation: Methods for studying programs and policies (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
47.
*Wilson, E.D., & Alcorn, D. (1969). Disability simulation and development of attitudes toward the exceptional. The Journal of Special Education, 3, 303—307.
