Universal design (UD), a concept from the field of architecture, is increasingly evident in discussions of approaches to enhance educational access for students with disabilities. Several emerging models of educational applications of UD—Universal Design for Learning, Universal Design for Instruction, and Universal Instructional Design—are discussed, with a call to the field for a collaborative approach to examine the efficacy of applications of UD to educational environments. Several critical areas for a research agenda are articulated, with caveats that the promise of UD for enhancing access not be undermined because of premature promotion of the concept before its validity is thoroughly examined.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adaptive Environments. (2004). Universal design. Retrieved January30, 2004, from http://www.adaptenv.org/universal/
2.
Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq.
Bremer, C.D. (2004, Fall, Winter). Universal design in secondary and postsecondary education. Impact, 16(3), 4—5, 32.
5.
Brinckerhoff, L.C., McGuire, J.M., & Shaw, S.F. (2002). Postsecondary education and transition for students with learning disabilities (2nd ed.). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
6.
Casper, B. (2003, Fall). Universal design can help all students. Pacesetter, 26(3), 9.
7.
Center for Applied Special Technology. (2004 a). About CAST. Retrieved January 17, 2004, from http://www.cast.org/about/
8.
Center for Applied Special Technology. (2004 b). CAST products. Retrieved January 17, 2004 , from http://www.cast.org/products/
9.
Center for Applied Special Technology. (2004 c). National Center on Accessing the General Curriculum. Retrieved January 17, 2004, from http://www.cast.org/ncac/
10.
Center for Applied Special Technology. (2006 ). Teaching every student. Retrieved February 21, 2006, from http://www.cast.org/teachingeverystudent/toolkits/tk_introduction.cfm?tk_id=21
11.
Center for Universal Design. (1997). Environments and products for all people. Raleigh : North Carolina State University, Center for Universal Design. Retrieved January 30, 2004, from http://www.design.ncsuedu/cud/univ_design/ud.htm.
12.
Dubin, R. (1969). Theory building. New York: Free Press.
13.
Edyburn, D.L. (2002). 2001 in review: A synthesis of the special education technology literature. Journal of Special Education Technology , 17, 5—24.
14.
Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988, 42 U.S.C 3601 et seq.
15.
Finn, C.E., Rotherham, A.J., & Hokanson, C.R. (2001). Rethinking special education for a new century. Washington, DC: Fordham Foundation.
16.
Follette Story, M., Mueller, J.L., & Mace, R.L. (1998). The universal design file: Designing for people of all ages and abilities. Raleigh: North Carolina State University, Center for Universal Design. Retrieved January 30, 2004, from http://www.ncsu.edu/ncsu/design/cud/pubs/center/books/ud_file/toc3b14.htm
17.
Graham, S. (2005). Preview. Exceptional Children , 71(2), 6.
18.
Horn, L., Berktold, J., & Bobbit, L. (1999). Students with disabilities in postsecondary education: A profile of preparation, participation, and outcomes ( National Center for Education Statistics No. 187). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
19.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, P.L. 108-446, 20 U.S.C § 1400 et seq.
20.
Kame'enui, E.J., & Carnine, D. (1998). E fective teaching strategies that accommodate diverse learners. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
21.
Kaplan, A. (1964). The conduct of inquiry. San Francisco: Chandler.
22.
Kauffman, J. (2002). Education deform: Bright people sometimes say stupid things about education. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.
23.
Kavale, K.A. (2002). Mainstreaming to full inclusion: From ontogenesis to pathogenesis of an idea. International Journal of DisabilityDevelopment and Education, 49, 201—214.
24.
Kavale, K.A., & Forness, S.R. (2000). History, rhetoric, and reality: Analysis of the inclusion debate. Remedial and Special Education, 21, 279— 296.
25.
Kuhn, T. (1996). The structure of scientific revolutions (3rd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
26.
Mace, R. (1998). Universal design in housing. Assistive Technology, 10(1), 21—28.
27.
National Capacity Building Institute. (2002 , Spring). Supporting individuals with disabilities across secondary school, postsecondary school and employment. Manoa: University of Hawaii, National Center for the Study of Postsecondary Educational Supports.
28.
National Council on Disability. (2003, September 15). People with disabilities and postsecondary education . Retrieved October 10, 2003, from http://www.ncd.gov/newsroom/publications/education.html
29.
New Freedom Initiative. (2001, February). Retrieved December 10, 2003, from http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/freedominitiative/freedominitiative.html
30.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, P.L. 107-110. Retrieved October 15, 2003, from http://www.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/esea02/index.html
31.
Orkwis, R., & McLane, K. (1998, Fall). A curriculum every student can use: Design principles for student access. Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
32.
Pedhazur, E., & Schmelkin, L. (1991). Measurement, design, and analysis: An integrated approach. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum .
33.
Scotch, R.K. (2000). Disability policy: An eclectic overview. Journal of DisabilityPolicy Studies, 11, 6—11.
34.
Scott, S.S., & McGuire, J.M. (2003). Universal design for instruction learning communities fact sheet. Storrs: University of Connecticut, Center on Postsecondary Education and Disability.
35.
Scott, S.S., & McGuire, J.M. (2005). Implementing universal design for instruction to promote inclusive college teaching. In E. E. Getzel & P. Wehman, Going to college: Expanding opportunities for people with disabilities (pp. 119—138). Baltimore: Brookes.
36.
Scott, S.S., McGuire, J.M., & Embry, P. (2002). Universal design for instruction fact sheet. Storrs: University of Connecticut, Center on Postsecondary Education and Disability.
37.
Scott, S.S., McGuire, J.M., & Foley, T.E. (2003). Universal design for instruction: A framework for anticipating and responding to disability and other diverse learning needs in the college classroom. Excellence & Equity in Education , 36, 40—49.
38.
Scott, S.S., McGuire, J.M., & Shaw, S.F. (2001). Principles of universal design for instruction . Storrs, University of Connecticut, Center on Postsecondary Education and Disability.
39.
Scott, S.S., McGuire, J.M., & Shaw, S.F. (2003). Universal design for instruction: A new paradigm for adult instruction in postsecondary education. Remedial and Special Education, 24, 369—379.
40.
Shaw, S.F., McGuire, J.M., & Scott, S.S. (2004). A framework for considering alternative paradigms . Storrs: University of Connecticut, Center on Postsecondary Education and Disability.
41.
Silver, P., Bourke, A., & Strehorn, K. (1998). Universal instructional design in higher education: An approach for inclusion. Excellence & Equity in Education , 31, 47—51.
42.
Smith, M.L., & Glass, G. (1987). Research and evaluation in education and the social sciences. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
43.
Thompson, S.J., Johnstone, C.J., & Thurlow, M.L. (2002). Universal design applied to large-scale assessments (NCEO Synthesis Report 44). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.
44.
Thurlow, M.L., Elliott, J.L., & Ysseldyke, J.E. (2003). Testing students with disabilities: Practical strategies for complying with district and state requirements (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA : Corwin Press.
45.
Universal Design Network. (2004). About Universal Design Network. Retrieved January 30, 2004, from http://www.universaldesign.net
46.
U.S. Department of Education. (2000). Twenty-second annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Washington, DC: Author.
47.
U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services. (2002). A new era: Revitalizing special education for children and their families. Washington, DC: Author.
48.
U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. (2003, December). Identifying and implementing educational practices supported by rigorous evidence: A user friendly guide . Washington, DC: Author.
49.
Weimer, M. (1990). Improving college teaching: Strategies for developing instructional e fectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
50.
Welch, P. (Ed.). (1995). Strategies for teaching universal design. Boston: Adaptive Environments.
51.
Wilkoff, W.L., & Abed, L.W. (1994). Practicing universal design: An interpretation of the ADA. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
52.
Ysseldyke, J.E., Algozzine, B., & Thurlow, M.L. (2000). Critical issues in special education. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
53.
Zola, I.K. (1989). Toward the necessary universalizing of disability policy. The Milbank Quarterly, 67(Suppl. 2, Pt. 2), 410—428.
