Access to the General Curriculum of Middle School Students with Mental Retardation

Abstract

The IDEA requires participation and progress in the general curriculum by all students. However, there is limited knowledge about the degree to which students with mental retardation have such access. This study examined the degree to which middle school students with mental retardation have access to the general curriculum and the impact of the classroom setting and the student's level of ability on such access. Findings indicated that students with mental retardation were most likely to participate with the general curriculum in the general education classroom and were less likely to engage in activities linked to a standard if they had more severe disabilities. Many students were engaged in activities in the general curriculum, but there was room for improvement in providing curricular modifications to promote access.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Agran, M. , Alper, S. , & Wehmeyer, M. (2002). Access to the general curriculum for students with significant disabilities: What it means to teachers. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities , 37, 123—133.

Bulgren, J. , & Lenz, K. (1996). Strategic instruction in the content areas. In D. D. Deshler , E. S. Ellis , & B. K. Lenz (Eds.), Teaching adolescents with learning disabilities: Strategies and methods (2nd ed., pp. 409— 473). Denver, CO: Love.

Center for Applied Special Technology. (1999 ). The National Center on Accessing the General Curriculum . Retrieved May 21, 2002, from http://www.cast.org/initiatives/national_center.html

Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1997, 20 U.S.C. § 1401, (26).

McGregor, G. , & Vogelsberg, R.T. (1998). Inclusive schooling practices: Pedagogical and research foundations. Baltimore: Brookes.

Orkwis, R. , & McLane, K. (1998). A curriculum every student can use: Design principles for student access [ERIC/OSEP topical brief]. Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children .

Rosenthal-Malek, A. , & Bloom, A. (1998). Beyond acquisition: Teaching generalization for students with developmental disabilities. In A. Hilton & R. Ringlaben (Eds.), Best and promising practices in developmental disabilities (pp. 139—155). Austin: PRO-ED .

Stainback, W. , Stainback, S. , Stefanich, G. , & Alper, S. (1996). Learning in inclusive classrooms: What about the curriculum? In S. Stainback & W. Stainback (Eds.), Inclusion: A guide for educators (pp. 209—219). Baltimore: Brookes .

Turnbull, H.R. , Turnbull, A.P. , Wehmeyer, M.L. , & Park, J. (in press). Taking stock and being serious about IDEA outcomes: A quality of life framework for special education. Remedial and Special Education.

10.

Wehmeyer, M.L. , Lance, G.D. , & Bashinski, S. (2002). Promoting access to the general curriculum for students with mental retardation: A multilevel model. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 37, 223—234.

11.

Wehmeyer, M.L. , Lattin, D. , & Agran, M. (2001). Promoting access to the general curriculum for students with mental retardation: A decision-making model. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities , 36, 329—344.

12.

Wehmeyer, M.L. , Sands, D.J. , Knowlton, H.E. , & Kozleski, E.B. (2002). Teaching students with mental retardation: Providing access to the general curriculum. Baltimore: Brookes.