The Effects of Peer-Assisted Learning Strategies and Curriculum-Based Measurement on the Mathematics Performance of Secondary Students with Disabilities
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online July, 2003
The Effects of Peer-Assisted Learning Strategies and Curriculum-Based Measurement on the Mathematics Performance of Secondary Students with Disabilities
The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of peer-assisted learning strategies (PALS) and curriculum-based measurement (CBM) on the mathematics performance of secondary students with disabilities. Ten classes with 92 students in Grades 9 through 12 participated. All students were significantly below grade level and received mathematics instruction in self-contained resource rooms. Classrooms were randomly assigned to PALS/CBM or the classroom mathematics program (control). PALS/CBM was implemented twice weekly and CBM was conducted weekly for 15 weeks. PALS/CBM students improved their computation math skills significantly more than control students, but no significant difference was found on concepts/application math skills. On questionnaires, teachers and students indicated that they (a) liked using PALS, (b) felt PALS was helpful in increasing mathematics skills, (c) thought CBM graphs increased motivation to work hard in math, and (d) would like to participate in PALS/CBM again. Results are discussed with respect to research and practice.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Algozzine, B., O'Shea, D., Crews, W.B., & Stoddard, K. (1987). Analysis of mathematics competence of learning disabled adolescents. The Journal of Special Education, 2, 97—107.
2.
Allsopp, D.H. (1997). Using classwide peer tutoring to teach beginning algebra problem-solving skills in heterogeneous classrooms. Remedial and Special Education, 18, 367—379.
3.
Bley, N.S., & Thorton, C.A. (1995). Teaching mathematics to students with learning disabilities (3rd ed.). Austin : PRO-ED.
4.
Bryant, D.P., Bryant, B.R., & Hammill, D.D. (2000). Characteristic behaviors of students with LD who have teacher-identified math weaknesses. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 168—177.
5.
Buckle down on Tennessee mathematics (2nd ed.). (1998). Iowa City, IA: Buckle Down Publishing.
Cawley, J.F., Fitzmaurice, A.M., Shaw, R., Kahn, H., & Bates, H., III. (1979). LD youth and mathematics: A review of characteristics . Learning Disability Quarterly , 2, 29—44.
8.
Cawley, J.F., & Miller, J.H. (1989). Cross-sectional comparisons of the mathematical performance of children with learning disabilities: Are we on the right track toward comprehensive programming?Journal of Learning Disabilities , 22, 250—259.
9.
Cawley, J., Parmar, R., Foley, T.E., Salmon, S., & Roy, S. (2001). Arithmetic performance of students: Implications for standards and programming. Exceptional Children, 67, 311—328.
10.
Cook, S.B., Scruggs, T.E., Mastropieri, M.A., & Casto, G.C. (1985—1986). Handicapped students as tutors. The Journal of Special Education, 19, 483—492.
Deno, S. (1985). Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative . Exceptional Children, 52, 229—237.
13.
Fleischner, J.E., Garnett, K., & Shepard, M. (1982). Proficiency in arithmetic basic fact computation by learning disabled and nondisabled children. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 4, 47—55.
14.
Fuchs, L.S., & Deno, S. (1990). Paradigmatic distinctions between instructionally relevant measurement models. Exceptional Children, 57, 488— 500.
15.
Fuchs, L.S., & Fuchs, D. (1988). Curriculum-based measurement: A methodology for evaluating and improving student programs. Diagnostique, 14(1), 3—13.
16.
Fuchs, L.S., & Fuchs, D. (1991). Curriculum-based measurements current applications and future directions. Preventing School Failure, 35(3), 6—11.
17.
Fuchs, L.S., & Fuchs, D. (1998). Building a bridge across the canyon. Learning Disability Quarterly, 21, 99—101.
18.
Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C., & Ferguson, C. (1992). Effects of expert system consultation within curriculum-based measurement, using a reading maze task. Exceptional Children , 58, 436—450.
19.
Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C.L., Phillips, N.B., & Bentz, J. (1994). Classwide curriculum-based measurement: Helping general educators meet the challenge of student diversity. Exceptional Children, 60, 518— 537.
20.
Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C.L., Phillips, N.B., Karns, K., & Dutka, S. (1997). Enhancing students helping behavior during peer-mediated instruction with conceptual mathematical explanations. Elementary School Journal, 91, 223—249.
21.
Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C.L., & Stecker, P.M. (1991). Effects of curriculum-based measurement and consultation of teacher planning and student achievement in mathematics operation. American Educational Research Journal, 28, 617—641.
22.
Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C.L., Thompson, A., Roberts, P.H., Kubek, P., & Stecker, P.M. (1994). Technical features of a mathematics concepts and applications curriculum-based measurement system. Diagnostique , 19(4), 23—29.
23.
Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., Karns, K., Hamlett, C.L., Phillips, N.B., & Dutka, S. (1997). Effects of task-focused goals on low-achieving students with and without learning disabilities. American Educational Research Journal, 34, 513—543.
24.
Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., Phillips, N.B., Hamlett, C.L., & Karns, K. (1995). Acquisition and transfer effects of classwide peer-assisted learning strategies in mathematics for students with varying learning histories. School Psychology Review, 24, 604—620.
25.
Kane, B.J., & Alley, G.R. (1980). A peer-tutored, instructional management program in computational mathematics for incarcerated, learning disabled juvenile delinquents. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 13, 148— 151.
26.
Maccini, P., & Hughes, C.A. (1997). Mathematics interventions for adolescents with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 12, 168—176.
27.
Maheady, L., & Harper, G. (1987). A classwide peer tutoring program to improve the spelling test performance of low-income, third- and fourth-grade students . Education and Treatment of Children, 10, 120—133.
28.
Maheady, L., Sacca, M.K., & Harper, G. (1988). Classwide student tutoring teams: The effects of peer-medicated instruction on the academic performance of secondary mainstreamed students. The Journal of Special Education, 21, 107—121.
29.
Maher, C.A. (1984). Handicapped adolescents as cross-age tutors: Program description and evaluation. Exceptional Children, 51, 56—63.
30.
McLeod, T.M., & Armstrong, S.W. (1982). Learning disabilities in mathematics—Skill deficits and remedial approaches at the intermediate and secondary level. Learning Disability Quarterly, 5, 305—311.
31.
Mehring, T.A., & Colson, S.E. (1993). Motivation and mildly handicapped learners. In E. L. Meyen, G. A. Vergason, & R. J. Whelan (Eds.), Educating students with mild disabilities (pp. 29—48). Denver, CO: Love.
32.
Mellberg, D.B. (1980). The effects of the handicapped and nonhandicapped tutor on the academic achievement of the economically disadvantaged adolescent tutor and the elementary age tutee (Doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin, 1980). Dissertation Abstracts International,42(02), 659A.
33.
Mercer, C.D., & Miller, S.P. (1992). Teaching students with learning problems in math to acquire, understand, and apply basic math facts. Remedial and Special Education, 13(3), 19—35.
34.
Montague, M., & Applegate, B. (1993). Middle school students' mathematical problem solving: An analysis of think-aloud protocols. Learning Disability Quarterly, 16, 19—30.
35.
Osguthorpe, R.T., & Scruggs, T.E. (1986). Special education students as tutors: A review and analysis. Remedial and Special Education, 7(4), 15—26.
36.
Patton, J.R., Cronin, J.F., Bassett, D.S., & Koppel, A.E. (1997). A life skills approach to mathematics instruction: Preparing students with learning disabilities for real-life math demands of adulthood. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 178—187.
37.
Roach, J.C., Paolucci-Whitcomb, P., Meyers, H.W., & Duncan, D.A. (1983). The comparative effects of peer tutoring in math by and for secondary special needs students. The Pointer, 27(4), 20—24.
38.
Singh, R.K. (1982). Peer tutoring: Its effects on the math skills of students designated as learning disabled (Doctoral dissertation, The American University, 1981). Dissertation Abstracts International,42, 4693A.
39.
Swanson, H.L., & Hoskyn, M. (1998). Experimental intervention research on students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of treatment outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 68, 277—321.
40.
Wagner, M. (1990). The school programs and school performance of secondary students classified as learning disabled: Findings from the national longitudinal transition study of special education students. Menlo Park, CA: DRI International.
41.
Woodward, J. (1991). Procedural knowledge in mathematics: The role of the curriculum. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24, 242—251.
42.
Zigmond, N., Sansone, J., Miller, S.E., Donahoe, K.A., & Kohnke, R. (1986). Teaching learning disabled students at the secondary level: What research and experience says to the teacher of exceptional children . Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
