An Analysis of the Impact of Anchored Instruction on Teaching and Learning Activities in Two Ninth-Grade Language Arts Classes

Abstract

This study employed classroom observations and teacher and student interviews to examine the impact of anchored instruction on student and teacher behaviors in two inclusive ninth-grade language arts classes. Specifically, the investigators examined the effect of anchored instruction on (a) the length (long or short) and level (factual or interpretive) of questions asked by, and responses to student questions by, the classroom teacher; (b) the length and level of questions asked by, and responses made by, ninth-grade students; and (c) student participation in classroom instructional activities. Overall, the results of this study supported the use of anchored instruction as a promising intervention for high school students with high-incidence disabilities. The results indicated that as teachers increased the level and length of their questions, students reciprocated by providing higher level and longer responses to questions and asked longer and higher level questions. Students were observed to be more actively involved in classroom instructional activities, and they increased their school attendance. The data collected in this study support the idea that technology combined with effective instruction can yield positive results for students and teachers. However, although the data are promising, they are preliminary. They underscore the importance of conducting additional research examining the impact of anchored instruction and its component parts on the academic outcomes attained by middle and high school students with high-incidence disabilities.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bransford, J.D. , Sherwood, R.D. , Hasselbring, T.S. , Kinzer, C.K. , & Williams, S.M. (1990). Anchored instruction: Why we need it and how technology can help. In D. Nix & R. Spiro (Eds.), Cognition, education, and multimedia: Exploring ideas in high technology (pp. 115—141). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Campione, J.C. , & Brown, A.L. (1990). Guided learning and transfer: Implications for approaches to assessment. In N. Fredrickson , R. Glaser , A. Lesgold , & M. Shafto (Eds.), Diagnostic monitoring of skill and knowledge acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. ( 1990). Anchored instruction and its relationship to situated cognition. Educational Researcher, 19(6), 2—10.

Fullan, M.G. , & Stiegelbauer, S. (1991). The new meaning of educational change (2nd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.

King, A. (1994). Guiding knowledge construction in the classroom: Effects of teaching children how to question and how to explain. American Educational Research Journal, 31(2), 338—368.

Kinzer, C.K. , Gabella, M.S. , & Rieth, H.J. (1994). An argument for using multimedia and anchored instruction to facilitate mildly disabled students' learning of literacy and social studies. Technology and Disability Quarterly, 3(2) 117—128.

Lee, H. (1960). To kill a mockingbird. Philadelphia : Lippincott.

O'Keefe, V. (1995). Speaking to think—thinking to speak: The importance of talk in the learning process. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

Rieth, H.J. , & Colburn, L.K. (2003). Anchoring instruction for students with disabilities . In D. P. Bryant & B. Bryant (Eds.), Assistive technology for people with disabilities. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

10.

Rieth, H. , & Polsgrove, L. (1994). Curriculum and instruction issues in teaching secondary students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 9(2), 118—126.

11.

Riley, R.W. , Holleman, F.S. , & Roberts, L.G. (2000). The national educational technology plan: Putting a world-class education at the fingertips of all children. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.

12.

Thornton, H.S. , & Zigmond, N. (1986). Follow-up of post-secondary age LD graduates and dropouts. LD Research, 1, 50—55.

13.

Wang, M.C. , & Palincsar, A.S. (1989). Teaching students to assume an active role in their learning. In M. C. Reynolds (Ed.), Knowledge base for the beginning teacher (pp. 71—84). Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.

14.

Williams Glaser, C. , Rieth, H.J. , Kinzer, C.K. , Prestidge, L.K. , & Peter, J. (1999). A description of the impact of multimedia anchored instruction on classroom interactions. Journal of Special Education Technology, 14(2), 27—53.