Bridging scientifically based theoretical approaches to quality instructional methods within classrooms in schools continues to be a challenge. Given the increasing demand for accountability, the implementation and evaluation of scientifically based interventions and strategies are necessary. This article describes the conceptual framework and the specific implementation activities that the state of Florida has used to ensure that quality, scientifically based instructional practices are implemented within classrooms and schools in Florida through a reconceptualized professional development model. The specific model and procedures that are described have been implemented and validated through the collaboration among professionals within the research community, the state department of education, and local staff developers, administrators, and teachers.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adams, M., Foorman, B., Lundberg, A., & Beeler, T. (1998). Phonemic awareness in young children: A classroom curriculum. Baltimore: Brookes.
2.
Baker, J., & Zigmond, N. (1995). The meaning and practice of inclusion for the students with learning disabilities: Themes and implications from the five cases. The Journal of Special Education, 29, 163—180.
3.
Barth, R.S. (1991). Improving schools from within. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
4.
Calhoun, E. (1994). How to use action research in the self-renewing school. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
5.
Carnine, D. (1999). Campaigns for moving research into practice. Remedial and Special Education20, 2—6, 35.
6.
Center for Policy Research on the Impact of General and Special Education Reform. (1996). Standards-based school reform and students with disabilities (Issue brief). Alexandria, VA: Author.
7.
Conger, J.A., & Benjamin, B. (1999). Building leaders: How successful companies develop the next generation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
8.
Cuban, L. (1996). Myths about changing schools and the case of special education. Remedial and Special Education, 17, 75—82.
9.
Deshler, D.D., & Schumacher, J.S. (1993). Strategy mastery by at-risk students: Not a simple matter. Elementary School Journal, 94, 153—167.
10.
Doyle, J. (1998). Phonemic awareness (Issue Brief, Florida Department of Education). Tallahassee, FL: Author.
11.
Englert, C.S., & Farrant, K.L. (1995). Creating collaborative culture for educational change. Remedial and Special Education, 16, 325—336.
12.
Erickson, R., Ysseldyke, J., Thurlow, M., & Elliott, J. (1998). Inclusive assessments and accountability systems . Teaching Exceptional Children, 31(2), 4—9.
13.
Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975, P.L. 42-142, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq.
14.
Espin, C.F.A., & Deno, S.L. (2000). Research to practice: Views from researchers and practitioners. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice , 15, 67—69.
15.
Evans, D.W., Harris, D.M., Adeigbola, M., Houston, D., & Argott, L. (1993). Restructuring special education services. Teacher Education and Special Education, 16, 137—145.
16.
Evans, D., & Panacek-Howell, L. (1995). Restructuring education: National reform in regular education. In J. L. Paul, H. Rosselli, & D. Evans (Eds.), Integrating school restructuring and special education reform (pp. 30—42). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace.
17.
Fisher, J.B., Schumacher, J.B., & Deshler, D.D. (1995). Searching for validated inclusive practices: A review of literature. Focus onExceptional Children, 28, 1—20.
18.
Florida Department of Education. (1999). Impact of sta f development (Issue brief). Tallahassee : Author.
19.
Forness, S., Kavale, K.A., Blum, J., & Lloyd, J.W. (1997). Mega-analysis of meta-analysis: What works in special education and related services. Teaching Exceptional Children, 29(6), 4—9.
20.
Fullan, M. (1993). Change forces: Probing the depths of educational reform. London: Falmer Press.
21.
Fullan, M. (1995). The limits and the potential of professional development . In T. Guskey & M. Huberman (Eds.), Professional development in education: New paradigms and practices (pp. 148—162). New York : Teachers College Press.
22.
Fullan, M. (1999). Change forces: The sequel. Bristol, PA: Falmer Press.
23.
Fullan, M. (2000). Leading in a culture of change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
24.
Fullan, M., & Hargreaves, A. (1992). What's worth fighting for? Working together for your school. Toronto: Elementary Teachers Federation of Ontario.
25.
Garmston, R. (1987). How administrators support peer coaching. Educational Leadership, 44(5), 18—26.
26.
Gersten, R., Vaughn, S., Deshler, D., & Schiller, E. (1997). What we know about using research findings: Implications for improving special education practice. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 466—476.
27.
Gersten, R., Woodward, J., & Morvant, M. (1992). Refining the working knowledge of experienced teachers. Educational Leadership, 49(7), 34—38.
28.
Glickman, C.D. (1993). Renewing America's schools: A guide for school-based action. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass .
29.
Greenwood, C., & Abbott, M. (2001). The research to practice gap in special education . Teacher Education and Special Education, 24, 276—289. Goodlad , J.I. (1992). On taking school reform seriously. Phi Delta Kappan,232—238.
30.
Goodlad, J. (1998). How teachers teach. New York : McGraw-Hill.
31.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1997, 20 U.S.C. § 1415.
32.
Joyce, B. (1990). Changing school culture through sta f development. The 1990 ASCD yearbook. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
33.
Joyce, B., & Showers, B. (1988). Student achievement through sta f development . New York: Longman.
34.
Kameenui, E. J., & Carmine, D. W. (Eds.). (1998). E fective strategies for accommodating students with diverse learning and curriculum needs. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
35.
Little, J.W. (1997). Teachers' professional development in a climate of educational reform. In M. Fullan (Ed.), The challenge of school change (pp. 123—141). Arlington Heights, IL: Skylight.
36.
Little, M.E. (2001a). Successful school improvement using classroom-based research. Educational Leadership, 2(1), 41—44.
37.
Little, M.E. (2001b). Summative report of EIP project. Tallahassee: Florida Department of Education.
38.
National Association of Secondary School Principals. (1996). Breaking ranks: Changing an American institution (Issue brief). Washington, DC: Author.
39.
Sagor, R. (1992). How to conduct collaborative action research. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision of Curriculum Development.
40.
Schmuck, R.A. (1997). Practical action research for change. Arlington Heights, IL: Skylight Training and Publishing .
41.
Senge, P., Combron-McCabe, N., Lucas, T., Dutton, J., & Kleiner, A. (2000). Schools that learn. New York : Doubleday.
42.
Sergiovanni, T.J. (1999). The lifeworld of leadership: Creating culture, community, and personal meaning in our schools. San Francisco : Jossey-Bass.
43.
Skrtic, J.M. (1991). The special education paradox: Equity as the way to excellence. Harvard Educational Review, 61, 148—207.
44.
Sparks, D., & Loucks-Horsley, S. (1992). Five models of sta f development for teachers. Oxford, OH: National Staff Development Council.
45.
Sparks, D., & Richardson, J. (1997). What is sta f development anyway?Oxford, OH: National Staff Development Council.
46.
Stanford, J. (1999). Victory in our schools: We CAN give our children excellent public education. New York: Bantam.
47.
Torgesen, J. (1992). Effects of two types of phonological awareness training on word learning in kindergarten children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 364—370.
48.
Turnbull, R., Rainbolt, K., & Buchele-Ash, A. (1997). Individuals with Disabilities Education Act: Digest of significance of 1997 amendments. Lawrence, KS: Beach Center on Families and Disability .
49.
U.S. Department of Education. (1996). Building knowledge for a nation of learners (Issue brief). Washington, DC: Author.
50.
Vaughn, S., & Sinagub, J.M. (1998). Social competence of students with learning disabilities: Intervention and issues. In B. Y. L. Wong (Ed.), Learning about learning disabilities (pp. 453—587). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
51.
Yopp, H.K. (1995). A test for assessing phonemic awareness in young children. The Reading Teacher, 45, 696—703.
52.
Ysseldyke, J., Thurlow, M., & Elliott, J. (1998). NCEO framework for educational accountability . Minneapolis, MN: National Center Educational Outcomes Publications Office.
