The provision of appropriate educational programs for students with disabilities continues to be clarified through amendments to the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) of 1990. Required in the latest amendments, in 1997, and the subsequent publication of the regulations in 1999, are a research-based method known as functional assessment of behavior (FAB) and a behavioral change strategy known as positive behavior supports (PBSs). This article provides a legal base for and describes the steps in implementing an FAB; it also provides examples of appropriate PBSs and their use with students with disabilities.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Berg, C. (1999). Positive behavioral supports or "If I had known then what I know now ...". TASHNewsletter, 25(11), 25-26.
2.
Braddock, D. (Ed.). (1999). Positive behavior support for people with developmental disabilities: A research synthesis. Washington, DC: AAMR .
3.
Chapman, C., Kincaid, D., & Shannon, P. (1999). The marketeers: A parent's perspective on positive behavioral support. TASHNewsletter, 25(11), 12-15.
4.
Code of Federal Regulations, 34 C.F.R. § 300 et seq. (1999).
5.
Danforth, J.S., & Drabman, R.S. (1989). Aggressive and disruptive behavior. In E. Cipani (Ed.), The treatment of severe behavior disorders: Behavior analysis approaches (pp. 111-127). Washington, DC: AAMR.
6.
Demchak, M.A., & Greenfield, R.G. (2000). A transition portfolio for Jeff, a student with multiple disabilities. Teaching Exceptional Children, 32(6), 44-49.
7.
Donnellan, A.M., LaVigna, G.W., Negri-Shoultz, N., & Fassbender, L.L. (1988). A functionally based approach to the treatment of self-injurious behavior. Behavior Modification , 12(4), 565∼589.
8.
Hammill, D.D., & Bartel, N.R. (1995). Teaching students with learning and behavior problems: Managing mild-to-moderate difficulties in resource and inclusive settings (6th ed.). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
9.
Heckaman, K., Conroy, M., Fox, J., & Chait, A. (2000). Functional assessment-based intervention research on students with or at risk for emotional and behavioral disorders in school settings. Behavioral Disorders, 25(3), 196-210.
10.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 1990, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq.
11.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1997, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq.
12.
Kerr, M.M., & Nelson, C.M. (1998). Strategies for managing behavior problems in the classroom (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
13.
Knoster, T., & Kincaid, D. (1999). Effective school practice in educating students with challenging behavior. TASHNewsletter, 11(25), 8-11.
14.
Maag, J.W. (1999). Behavior management: From theoretical implications to practical applications. San Diego: Singular.
15.
O'Neill, R.E., Horner, R.H., Albin, R.W., Sprague, J.R., Storey, K., & Newton, J.S. (1997). Functional assessment and program development for problem behavior: A practical handbook (2nd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole .
16.
Seligman, T.J. (2000). Not as simple as ABC: Disciplining children with disabilities under the 1997 IDEA Amendments. Arizona Law Review , 42(1), 77-127.
17.
Simpson, R.L. (1999). Children and youth with emotional and behavior disorders: A concerned look at the present and hopeful eye for the future . Behavioral Disorders, 24, 284-292.
18.
Smith, M. (1990). Autism and life in the community: Successful interventions for behavioral challenges. Baltimore: Brookes.
19.
Stein, M., & Davis, C.A. (2000). Direct instruction as a positive behavioral support. BeyondBehavior, 10(1), 7-12.
