No universally accepted tool currently exists for assessing self-directed learning (SDL), and few studies have focused on validating new SDL instruments to achieve broad consensus regarding their psychometric rigor and applicability. This study examines the concurrent validity of two SDL tools: the SRSSDL_adult for middle-aged and older adults, and the SDLI for nursing students. These tools were administered to participants in Taiwanese senior learning centers, who were predominantly female (78.8%) and aged 65–74 years (45.6%), with many holding undergraduate degrees (43.8%). The highest scores were observed in “Needs assessment” (SRSSDL_adult) and “Learning motivation” (SDLI). A strong positive correlation (Pearson coefficient = 0.783, p < .001) confirmed the concurrent validity of the SRSSDL_adult against the SDLI. The two SDL assessment tools examined in this study can concurrently provide valuable insights into the identification of SDL abilities. The findings indicate that both scales are directly applicable to middle-aged and older learners.
BrockettR. G.HiemstraR. (2018). Self-direction in adult learning: Perspectives on theory, research and practice. Routledge.
2.
CadorinL.BortoluzziG.PaleseA. (2013). The self-rating scale of self-directed learning (SRSSDL): A factor analysis of the Italian version. Nurse Education Today, 33(12), 1511–1516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2013.04.010
3.
CadorinL.ChengS.-F.PaleseA. (2016). Concurrent validity of self-rating scale of self-directed learning and self-directed learning instrument among Italian nursing students. BMC Nursing, 15(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-016-0142-x
4.
CadorinL.GhezziV.CamilloM.PaleseA. (2017). The self-rating scale of self-directed learning tool: Findings from a confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice, 7(2), 31–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.5430/jnep.v7n2p31
5.
ChengS.-F.KuoC.-L.LinK.-C.Lee-HsiehJ. (2010). Development and preliminary testing of a self-rating instrument to measure self-directed learning ability of nursing students. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 47(9), 1152–1158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.02.002
6.
ChouC.-Y.ChenC.-S.LeeM.-C.LinS.-T.SunJ.-H. (2023). Active aging of older adults in rural area after participating in senior self-directed learning groups. Educational Gerontology, 49(2), 143–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601277.2022.2091330
7.
ClausenN. R. (2023). Self-directed learning in problem-and project-based learning: A study of self-direction in the Aalborg PBL model.
8.
ClausenN. R.HansenC. D. (2022). Revitalizing the Oddi Continuing Learning Inventory. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 21(5), 351–366. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.5.18
9.
FerrellB. (1978). Attitudes toward learning styles and self-direction of ADN students. The Journal of Nursing Education, 17(2), 19–22. https://doi.org/10.33425/2639-9474.1082
10.
FisherM.KingJ. (2010). The self-directed learning readiness scale for nursing education revisited: A confirmatory factor analysis. Nurse Education Today, 30(1), 44–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2009.05.020
11.
FisherM.KingJ.TagueG. (2001). Development of a self-directed learning readiness scale for nursing education. Nurse Education Today, 21(7), 516–525. https://doi.org/10.1054/nedt.2001.0589
12.
GuglielminoL. M. (1977). Development of the self-directed learning readiness scale [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Georgia.
13.
HersheyD. A.Jacobs-LawsonJ. M.McArdleJ. J.HamagamiF. (2007). Psychological foundations of financial planning for retirement. Journal of Adult Development, 14, 26–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10804-007-9028-1
14.
Jacobs-LawsonJ. M.HersheyD. A.NeukamK. A. (2004). Gender differences in factors that influence time spent planning for retirement. Journal of Women & Aging, 16(3-4), 55–69. https://doi.org/10.1300/J074v16n03_05
15.
KnowlesM. S. (1975). Self-directed learning: A guide for learners and teachers. Association Press.
16.
LiaoF.-M.ChenG.-L.HsuC.-T.LiuY.-H.ChengL.-L.ChanX.-C.WeiH.-C. (2024). Validation of the self-directed learning scale for middle-aged and older adults. Educational Gerontology, 50(4), 304–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601277.2023.2270874
17.
LinD. L.YuP.ChenW. T. (2011). A contextual analysis of the retirement experience. Taiwanese Journal of Social Welfare, 9(2), 39–90. https://doi.org/10.6265/TJSW.2011.9(2)1
18.
ManningG. (2007). Self-directed learning: A key component of adult learning theory. Business and Public Administration Studies, 2(2), 104–104.
19.
MorrisT. H. (2024). Four dimensions of self-directed learning: A fundamental meta-competence in a changing world. Adult Education Quarterly, 74(3), 236–254.
20.
MorrisT. H.RohsM. (2021). Digitization bolstering self-directed learning for information literate adults–A systematic review. Computers and Education Open, 2, 100048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2021.100048
PulakkaA.LeskinenT.KosterA.PenttiJ.VahteraJ.StenholmS. (2019). Daily physical activity patterns among aging workers: The Finnish retirement and aging study (FIREA). Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 76(1), 33–39. https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2018-105266
23.
RobersonD. N.JrMerriamS. B. (2005). The self-directed learning process of older, rural adults. Adult Education Quarterly, 55(4), 269–287. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741713605277372
24.
ShenW.-Q.ChenH.-L.HuY. (2014). The validity and reliability of the self-directed learning instrument (SDLI) in mainland Chinese nursing students. BMC Medical Education, 14(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-14-1
25.
SörensenS.MissellR. L.Eustice-CorwinA.OtienoD. A. (2021). Perspectives on aging-related preparation. Journal of Elder Policy, 1(2), 163–221. https://doi.org/10.18278/jep.1.2.7
26.
VerdoodtK.BatinkT.SimonsM.JanssensM.PeetersS.LatasterJ.JacobsN.ReijndersJ. (2023). Positive aging: Feasibility and acceptability of an eHealth ACT module for middle-aged and older adults. Educational Gerontology, 49(9), 737–757. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601277.2022.2160571
ZhuY.ZhangW. (2019). Active learning for active ageing: Chinese senior immigrants’ lifelong learning in Canada. Educational Gerontology, 45(8), 506–518. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601277.2019.1662933
