Critical Discourse and Critical Reflection in Mezirow’s Theory of Transformative Learning: A Dialectic Between Ontology and Epistemology (and a Subtext of Reflexivity Mirroring My Own Onto-Epistemological Movement)
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online November, 2021
Critical Discourse and Critical Reflection in Mezirow’s Theory of Transformative Learning: A Dialectic Between Ontology and Epistemology (and a Subtext of Reflexivity Mirroring My Own Onto-Epistemological Movement)
In this article, I argue that critical discourse in Mezirow’s theory of transformative learning is a constructionist, ontological act that serves to support an individual’s critical reflection, which, in turn, is a constructivist, epistemological act. The notion of onto-epistemology is helpful in bringing to the fore the entanglement of these two concepts, and mirrors my own reflexivity and my own transformative learning process in coming to determine the relationship between constructionism and constructivism, and between critical discourse and critical reflection. It is important that facilitators of adult education are aware of the theory underpinning both of these concepts so that, like myself, their choices in designing learning activities is grounded in, and guided by, theory, enabling them to support and facilitate appropriate learning outcomes.
BaradK. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822388128
2.
BergerP.LuckmannT. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Penguin.
3.
BrunerJ. (1990). Acts of meaning. Harvard University Press.
4.
BullockA.TrombleyS. (1999). The new Fontana dictionary of modern thought. Fontana.
ClarkM. C.WilsonA. L. (1991). Context and rationality in Mezirow’s theory of transformational learning. Adult Education Quarterly, 41(2), 75–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001848191041002002
7.
CollardS.LawM. (1989). The limits of perspective transformation: A critique of Mezirow’s theory. Adult Education Quarterly, 39(2), 99–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001848189039002004
8.
CrantonP. (2006). Understanding and promoting transformative learning: A guide for educators of adults (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
9.
CreswellJ. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Sage.
10.
DirkxJ. M.MezirowJ.CrantonP. (2006). Musings and reflections on the meaning, context and process of transformative learning: A dialogue between Jon M. Dirkx and Jack Mezirow. Journal of Transformative Education, 4(2), 123–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541344606287503
11.
EricksonD. M. (2007). A developmental re-forming of the phases of meaning in transformational learning. Adult Education Quarterly, 58(1), 61–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741713607305936
12.
ErnestP. (1995). The one and the many. In SteffeL.GaleJ. (Eds.), Constructivism in education (pp. 459–486). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
13.
FreireP. (1972). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Penguin.
GubaE. G.LincolnY. S. (Eds.). (1994). Handbook of qualitative research. Sage.
16.
HabermasJ. (1970). Towards a rational society. Beacon Press.
17.
HabermasJ. (1971). Knowledge and human interests. Beacon Press.
18.
HydeB. (2015). Confusion in the field! Providing clarity on constructivism and constructionism in religious education. Religious Education, 110(3), 289–302.
19.
HydeB. (2020). Constructivist and constructionist epistemology in a globalised world: Clarifying the constructs. In ZajdaJ. (Ed.), Globalisation, Ideology and Education Reforms – Emerging Paradigms (pp. 125–138). Springer.
20.
InglisT. (1997). A critical realist approach to emancipation: A response to Mezirow. Adult Education Quarterly, 49(1), 72–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/074171369804900110
21.
KantI. (1952). The critique of pure reason (MeiklejohnJ. M. D., Trans.). Encyclopedia Britannica (Original work published 1781)
22.
KeganR. (2000). What “form” transforms? A constructive-developmental approach to transformative learning. In MezirowJ. (Ed.), Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress (pp. 35–69). Jossey-Bass.
MezirowJ. (1975). Education for perspective transformation: Women’s recent programs in community colleges. Centre for Adult Education, Teacher’s College, Columbia University.
MezirowJ. (1997). Transformative learning: Theory to practice. New Directions for Adult & Continuing Education, 1997(74), 5–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.7401
MezirowJ. (2000). Learning to think like an adult: Core concepts of transformation theory. In MezirowJ. (Ed.), Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress (pp. 3–33). Jossey-Bass.
35.
MezirowJ. (2004). Forum comments on Sharan Merriam’s “the role of cognitive development in Mezirow’s transformative learning theory.”Adult Education Quarterly, 55(1), 69–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741713604268892
NerstromN. (2017). Transformative learning: Moving beyond theory and practice. International Journal of Adult Vocational Education and Technology, 8(1), 36–46. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijavet.2017010104
40.
PackerM. J.GoicoecheaJ. (2000). Sociocultural and constructivist theories of learning: Ontology, not just epistemology. Educational Psychologist, 25(4), 227–241. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3504_02
RogoffB. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. Oxford University Press.
46.
StoneR. (2006). Does pragmatism lead to pluralism? Exploring the disagreement between Jerome Bruner and William James regarding pragmatism’s goal. Theory and Psychology, 16(4), 553–564. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354306066206
47.
TaylorE. W. (2007). An update on transformative learning theory: A critical review of the empirical research (1999-2005). International Journal of Lifelong Education, 26(2), 173–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370701219475
TisdellE. J. (2012). Themes and variations of transformational learning: Interdisciplinary perspectives on forms that transform. In TaylorE. W.CrantonP. (Eds.), The handbook of transformative learning: Theory, research and practice (pp. 21–36). Jossey-Bass.
von GlasersfeldE. (1995). Radical constructivism: A way of knowing and learning. The Falmer Press.
52.
VygotskyL. S. (1978). Mind and society. Harvard University Press.
53.
ZembylasM. (2017). The contribution of the ontological turn in education: Some methodological and political implications. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 49(14), 1401–1414. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2017.1309636
