What Strategies Do Less-Skilled Adult Readers Use to Read Words,and How Aware Are They of These Strategies?

Abstract

Less-skilled adult readers have been found to be limited in their awareness and use of effective reading strategies. In this study, we aimed to (a) identify the strategies used by less-skilled adult readers that best predict word reading performance on standardized reading tests and (b) identify the word reading strategies that less-skilled adult readers reported using, as well as the extent to which these reports correlated with direct observations of reading behaviors. Results indicated that readers relied on six main strategies to read unknown words, but only two significantly contributed to prediction of actual word reading performance. These were also the two strategies that were most poorly understood by the readers. The findings emphasize the need for programs to incorporate methods to increase metacognitive awareness and strategy use in adults with reading difficulties.

Keywords

word-reading strategies less-skilled adult readers metacognition

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Binder

Borecki

(2008). The use of phonological, orthographic, and contextual information during reading: A comparison of adults who are learning to read and skilled adult readers. Reading and Writing, 21, 843–858. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9099-1

Castles

Coltheart

Larsen

Jones

Saunders

McArthur

(2009). Assessing the basic components of reading: A revision of the Castles and Coltheart test with new norms. Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties, 14(1), 67–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/19404150902783435

Castles

Nation

(2008). Learning to be a good orthographic reader. Journal of Research in Reading, 31(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2007.00367.x

Centre for Longitudinal Studies. (2014). The impact of adult literacy and numeracy research based on the 1970 British cohort study. Author.

Chevalier

T. M.

Parrila

Ritchie

K. C.

Deacon

S. H.

(2017). The role of metacognitive reading strategies, metacognitive study and learning strategies, and behavioral study and learning strategies in predicting academic success in students with and without a history of reading difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 50(1), 34–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219415588850

Coyne

Farrington-Flint

Underwood

Stiller

(2012). Sensitivity to rime unit frequency and children’s early word reading strategies. Journal of Research in Reading, 35(4), 393–410. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2010.01474.x

Cunningham

A. E.

Nathan

R. G.

Raher

K. S.

(2011). Orthographic processing in models of word recognition. In Kamil

M. L.

Pearson

P. D.

Moje

E. B.

Afflerbach

(Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 4, pp. 259–285). Routledge.

Davidson

R. K.

Strucker

(2002). Patterns of word-recognition errors among adult basic education native and non-native speakers of English. Scientific Studies of Reading, 6(3), 299–316. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532799XSSR0603_5

Dennis

D. V.

Kroeger

D. C.

(2012). Examining the relationship between adolescents’ orthographic knowledge and overall reading ability. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 28(4), 358–376. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2011.596110

10.

Ehri

L. C.

(2005). Learning to read words: Theory, findings and issues. Scientific Studies of Reading, 9(2), 167–188. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr0902_4

11.

EU High Level Group of Experts on Literacy. (2012). Final report. Publications office of the European Union.

12.

Farrington-Flint

Coyne

Stiller

Heath

(2008). Variability in children’s early reading strategies. Educational Psychology, 28(6), 643–661. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410802140958

13.

Furnes

Norman

(2015). Metacognition and reading: Comparing three forms of metacognition in normally developing readers and readers with dyslexia. Dyslexia, 21(3), 273–284. https://doi.org/10.1002/dys.1501

14.

Garner

Reis

(1981). Monitoring and resolving comprehension obstacles: An investigation of spontaneous lookbacks among upper grade good and poor comprehenders. Reading Research Quarterly, 16(3), 569–582. https://doi.org/10.2307/747316

15.

Greenberg

Ehri

L. C.

Perin

(2002). Do adult literacy students make the same word reading errors as children matched for word reading age? Scientific Studies of Reading, 6(3), 221–244. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532799XSSR0603_2

16.

Greenberg

Wise

J. C.

Morris

Fredrick

L. D.

Rodrigo

Nanda

A. O.

Pae

H. K.

(2011). A randomized control study of instructional approaches for struggling adult readers. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 4(2), 101–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2011.555288

17.

Hock

M. F.

Mellard

D. F.

(2011). Efficacy of learning strategies instruction in adult education. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 4(2), 134–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2011.555291

18.

Hong-Nam

Leavell

A. G.

Maher

(2014). The relationships among reported strategy use, metacognitive awareness, and reading achievement of high school students. Reading Psychology, 35(8), 762–790. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2013.807900

19.

House of Commons Business, Innovation and Skills Committee. (2014). Adult literacy and numeracy: Fifth report of session 2014–2015. The Stationary Office.

20.

Kruidenier

J. R.

MacArthur

C. A.

Spruck Wrigley

(2010). Adult education literacy instruction: A review of the research. National Institute for Literacy. https://doi.org/10.1037/e569842011-001

21.

MacArthur

C. A.

Konold

T. R.

Glutting

J. J.

Alamprese

J. A.

(2010). Reading component skills of learners in adult basic education. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43(2), 108–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219409359342

22.

MacArthur

C. A.

Konold

T. R.

Glutting

J. J.

Alamprese

J. A.

(2012). Subgroups of adult basic education learners with different profiles of reading skills. Reading and Writing, 25, 587–609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9287-2

23.

Macaruso

Shankweiler

(2010). Expanding the simple view of reading in accounting for reading skills in community college students. Reading Psychology, 31, 454–471. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702710903241363

24.

Mahasneh

A. M.

Alkhawaldeh

M. F.

Almakanin

H. A.

(2016). Assessing students’ meta-cognitive awareness reading strategies in Jordan. North American Journal of Psychology, 18(2), 229–238. https://doi.org/10.1037/t53192-000

25.

McHardy

Chapman

(2019a). Adult literacy teachers’ perspectives on reading difficulties and the origins of these perspectives. Adult Literacy Education, 1, 6–18. https://doi.org/10.35847/JMcHardy.EChapman.1.1.6

26.

McHardy

Chapman

(2019b). The teaching focus of adult-reading teachers when developing word reading skills: Teacher focus in adult word reading. Literacy, 53(1), 125–133. https://doi.org/10.1111/lit.12168

27.

Mellard

D. F.

Fall

(2012). Component model reading comprehension for adult education participants. Learning Disability Quarterly, 35(1), 10–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948711429197

28.

Mellard

D. F.

Fall

Woods

K. L.

(2010). A path analysis of reading comprehension for adults with low literacy. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43(2), 154–165. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219409359345

29.

Mokhtari

Reichard

C. A.

(2002). Assessing students’ metacognitive awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 249–259. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.2.249

30.

Morrisroe

(2014). Literacy changes lives 2014: A new perspective on health, employment and crime. National Literacy Trust.

31.

National Research Council. (2012). Improving adult literacy instruction: Options for practice and research. The National Academies Press.

32.

OECD. (2016). Skills matter: Further results from the survey of adult skills, OECD skills studies. OECD Publishing.

33.

OECD Skills Outlook. (2013). Skilled for life? Key findings of the survey of adult skills. OECD Publishing.

34.

Palameta

Myers

Conte

(2013). Applying performance funding to essential skills: State of knowledge review. Social Research and Demonstration Corporation.

35.

Roberts

T. A.

Christo

Shefelbine

J. A.

(2011). Word recognition. In Kamil

M. L.

Pearson

P. D.

Moje

E. B.

Afflerbach

(Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 4, pp. 229–258). Routledge.

36.

Sabatini

J. P.

Sawaki

Shore

J. R.

Scarborough

H. S.

(2010). Relationships among reading skills of adults with low literacy. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43(2), 122–138. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219409359343

37.

Schiff

Ben-Shushan

Y. N.

Ben-Artzi

(2017). Metacognitive strategies: A foundation for early word spelling and reading in kindergartners with SLI. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 50(2), 143–157. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219415589847

38.

Seymour

P. H. K.

Aro

Erskine

J. M.

(2003). Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies. British Journal of Psychology, 94(2), 143–174. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712603321661859

39.

Snow

C. E.

Strucker

(1999). Lessons from preventing reading difficulties in young children for adult learning and literacy. In Review of adult learning and literacy (Vol. 1, Chap. 2). National Center for the Study of Adult Learning and Literacy. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED508704.pdf

40.

Stanovich

K. E.

(1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21(4), 360–406. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.21.4.1

41.

Thompkins

A. C.

Binder

K. S.

(2003). A comparison of the factors affecting reading performance of functionally illiterate adults and children matched by reading level. Reading Research Quarterly, 38(2), 236–258. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.38.2.4

42.

Wang

H.-C.

Castles

Nickels

Nation

(2011). Context effects on orthographic learning of regular and irregular words. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 109(1), 39–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2010.11.005

43.

Wilkinson

G. S.

Robertson

G. J.

(2006). WRAT4: Wide range achievement test. Psychological Assessment Resources. https://doi.org/10.1037/t27160-000

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.01 MB