Adult learners and female students report higher levels of mathematics anxiety than their peers, suggesting that female adult learners may be particularly vulnerable. This study used Bandura’s triarchic reciprocal causality model as a foundation and interviewed five highly mathematics anxious female adult learners to understand their perceptions of the causes of their mathematics anxiety. Thematic interpretation revealed five themes from the interviews; time since last educational experience emerged as the strongest theme, with other personal and environmental factors also emerging. The findings support a social cognitive perspective of mathematics anxiety. Suggestions for pedagogical techniques with adult learners are included.
AdelmanC. (1999). Answers in the tool box: Academic intensity, attendance patterns, and bachelor’s degree attainment. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
2.
AdelmanC. (2005). Principal indicators of student academic histories in postsecondary education, 1972-2000. U.S. Department of Education.
3.
AmbroseS. A.BridgesM. W.DiPietroM.LovettM. C.NormanM. K. (2010). How learning works: 7 Research-based principles for smart teaching. Jossey-Bass.
4.
AshcraftM. H. (2002). Math anxiety: Personal, educational, and cognitive consequences. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 181–185. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00196
5.
AshcraftM. H.KrauseJ. A. (2007). Working memory, math performance, and math anxiety. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 243–248.
BonhamB. S.BoylanH. R. (2011). Developmental mathematics: Challenges, promising practices, and recent initiatives. Journal of Developmental Education, 34, 2–10.
10.
ButlerA. C.MarshE. J.SlavinskyJ. P.BaraniukR. G. (2014). Integrating cognitive science and technology improves learning in a STEM classroom. Educational Psychology Review, 26, 331–340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-014-9256-4
11.
CalcagnoJ. C.CrostaP.BaileyT.JenkinsD. (2007). Stepping stones to a degree: The impact of enrollment pathways and milestones on community college student outcomes. Research in Higher Education, 48, 775–801. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-007-9053–8
12.
CargneluttiE.TomasettoC.PassolunghiM. C. (2017). How is anxiety related to math performance in young students? A longitudinal study of Grade 2 to Grade 3 children. Cognition and Emotion, 31, 755–764. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2016.1147421
13.
ChangH.BeilockS. L. (2016). The math anxiety-math performance link and its relation to individual and environmental factors: A review of current behavioral and psychophysiological research. Current Opinion in Behavioral Science, 10, 33–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2016.04.011
14.
ChenJ. C. (2017). Nontraditional adult learners: The neglected diversity in postsecondary education. SAGE Open, 7, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244017697161
15.
ChoyS. (2002). Findings from the condition of education 2002: Nontraditional undergraduates. National Center for Education Statistics.
16.
ClarkL. (2012). When nontraditional is traditional: A faculty dialogue with graduating community college students about persistence. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 36, 511–519. https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2012.664090
17.
DeutschN. L.SchmertzB. (2011). “Starting from ground zero”: Constraints and experiences of adult women returning to college. Review of Higher Education, 34, 477–504. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2011.0002
18.
DonaldsonJ. F.FlanneryD.Ross-GordonJ. M. (1993). A triangulated study comparing adult college students’ perceptions of effective teaching with those of traditional students. Continuing Higher Education Review, 57, 1147–1163.
19.
DowkerA.SarkarA.LooiC. Y. (2016). Mathematics anxiety: What have we learned in 60 years?Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 508. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00508
20.
ElmanC.O’RandA. M. (2007). The effects of social origins, life events, and institutional sorting on adults’ school transitions. Social Science Research, 36, 1276–1299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2006.11.001
21.
EvansJ. (2000). Adults’ mathematical thinking and emotions: A study of numerate practices. Routledge.
22.
FidishunD. (2000). Teaching adult students to use computerized resources: Utilizing Lawler’s keys to adult learning to make instruction more effective. Information Technologies and Libraries, 19, 157–158.
23.
FitzSimonsG. E.GoddenG. L. (2000). Review of research on adults learning mathematics. In CobensD.O’DonoghueJ.FitzSimonsG. E. (Eds.), Perspectives on adults learning mathematics (pp. 13–45). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
24.
GotoS. T.MartinC. (2009). Psychology of success: Overcoming barriers to pursuing further education. Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 57, 10–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/07377360902810744
25.
HardinC. J. (2008). Adult students in higher education: A portrait of transitions. New Directions for Higher Education, 144, 49–57. https://doi.org/10.1002/he.325
26.
HayD.KinchinI.Lygo-BakerS. (2008). Making learning visible: The role of concept mapping in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 33, 295–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070802049251
27.
HendyH. M.SchorschinskyN.WadeB. (2014). Measurement of math beliefs and their associations with math behaviors in college students. Psychological Assessment, 26, 1225–1234.
28.
Hollis-SawyerL. (2011). A math-related decrement stereotype threat reaction among older nontraditional college learners. Educational Gerontology, 37, 292–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601271003608845
29.
HopkoD. R.MahadevanR.BareR. L.HuntM. K. (2003). The Abbreviated Math Anxiety Scale (AMAS): Construction, validity, and reliability. Assessment, 10, 178–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191103010002008
30.
HubermanA. M.MilesM. B. (1994). Data management and analysis methods. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 428–444). Sage.
31.
JamesonM. M. (2013). The development and validation of the Children’s Anxiety in Math Scale. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 31, 391–395. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282912470131
32.
JamesonM. M. (2014). Contextual factors related to math anxiety in second-grade children. Journal of Experimental Education, 82, 518–536. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2013.813367
33.
JamesonM. M.FuscoB. R. (2014). Math anxiety, math self-concept, and math self-efficacy in adult learners compared to traditional undergraduate students. Adult Education Quarterly, 64, 306–322. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741713614541461
34.
JohnsonP.O’KeeffeL. (2016). The effect of a pre-university mathematics bridging course on adult learners’ self-efficacy and retention rates in STEM subjects. Irish Educational Studies, 35, 233–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2016.119248
35.
KallisonJ. M.Jr. (2017). The effects of an intensive postsecondary transition program on college readiness for adult learners. Adult Education Quarterly, 67, 302–321. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741713617725394
36.
KaswormC. E. (2008). Emotional challenges of adult learners in higher education. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 120, 27–34. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.313
37.
LamontR. A.SwiftH. J.AbramsD. (2015). A review and meta-analysis of age-based stereotype threat: Negative stereotypes, not facts, do the damage. Psychology and Aging, 30, 180–193.
38.
LandisJ. R.KochG. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174.
39.
LebermanS.McDonaldL. (2006). The transfer of learning: Participants perspectives of adult education and training. Routledge.
40.
McGivneyV. (2004). Understanding persistence in adult learning. Open Learning: Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 19, 33–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/0268051042000177836
41.
MigliettiC. L.StrangeC. C. (1998). Learning styles, classroom environment preferences, teaching styles, and remedial course outcomes for underprepared adults at a two-year college. Community College Review, 26, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/009155219802600101
42.
Miller-ReillyB. (2007). Three different teaching approaches in pre-calculus bridging mathematics. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 38, 891–905. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207390701557189
National Center for Education Statistics. (2009). Projections of educational statistics to 2018: Table 11. Actual and middle alternative projects numbers for total enrollment in all degree-granting postsecondary institutions by sex, age, and attendance status: Fall 1993 to Fall 2018. https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2009/2009062.pdf
45.
OsamE. K.BergmanM.CumberlandD. M. (2017). An integrative literature review on the barriers impacting adult learners’ return to college. Adult Learning, 28, 54–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/1045159516658013
46.
ParkJ. H.ChoiH. J. (2009). Factors influencing adult learners’ decision to drop out or persist in online learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 12, 207–217.
47.
PassolunghiM. C.CaviolaS.de AgostiniR.PerinC.MammarellaI. C. (2016). Mathematics anxiety, working memory, and mathematics performance in secondary-school children. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 42. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00042
48.
PerryS. M.CatapanoM.RamonO. G. (2016). Teaching, academic achievement, and attitudes toward mathematics in the United States and Nigeria. Journal for Leadership and Instruction, 15, 5–12.
49.
PhillipsL. A.BaltzerC.FiloonL.WhitleyC. (2017). Adult student preferences: Instructor characteristics conducive to successful teaching. Journal of Adult and Continuing Education, 23, 49–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477971416683488
50.
RamirezG.ShawS. T.MaloneyE. A. (2018). Math anxiety: Past research, promising interventions, and a new interpretation framework. Educational Psychologist, 53, 145–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2018.447384
51.
Ross-GordonJ. M. (1991). Needed: A multicultural perspective for adult education research. Adult Education Quarterly, 42, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/074171369104200101
52.
Ross-GordonJ. M. (2003). Adult learners in the classroom. New Directions in Student Services, 102, 43–52.
53.
SchunkD. H.DiBenedettoM. K. (2016). Self-efficacy theory in education. In WentzelK. R.MieleD. B. (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (2nd ed., pp.34–54). Routledge.
54.
SchwarzerR. (2014). Self-efficacy: Thought control of action. Routledge.
55.
SiivonenP. (2013). “A bad head for maths?” Constructions of educability and mathematics in adult students’ narrative life histories. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 57, 505–525. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2012.696208
56.
SogunroO. A. (2015). Motivating factors for adult learners in higher education. International Journal of Higher Education, 4, 22–37.
57.
SpencerS. J.SteeleC. M.QuinnD. M. (1999). Stereotype threat and women’s math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 4–28. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1998.1373
58.
SteeleC. M.AronsonJ. (1994). Stereotype vulnerability and intellectual performance. In AronsonE. (Ed.), Readings about the social animal (7th ed., pp. 409–421). Freeman.
59.
SteichenE. M. (1996). Strategically representing policy issues and decisions as problems: The social construction of the jail location controversy in Riley County, Kansas (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Kansas State University, Manhattan.
60.
Suarez-PellicioniM.Nunez-PenaM. I.ColomeA. (2016). Math anxiety: A review of its cognitive consequences, psychophysiological correlates, and brain bases. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 16, 3–22.
61.
UsherE. L.PajaresF. (2008). Sources of self-efficacy in school: Critical review of the literature and future directions. Review of Educational Research, 78, 751–796. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308321456
62.
van MerrienboerJ. J. G.KirschnerP. A.KesterL. (2003). Taking the load off a learner’s mind: Instructional design for complex learning. Educational Psychologist, 38, 5–13.
63.
WlodkowskiR. J.GinsbergM. B. (2017). Enhancing adult motivation to learn: A comprehensive guide for teaching all adults. Jossey-Bass.
64.
ZacharakisJ.SteichenM.DiazdeSabatesG.GlassD. (2011). Understanding the experiences of adult learners: Content analysis of focus group data. Adult Basic Education and Literacy Journal, 5, 84–95.
