There is contrary research around whether collaboration at work fosters individual learning and skill development. This study’s purpose was to examine the relationship between social characteristics of jobs on adults’ cognitive skills as measured by the Program for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies (PIAAC). For select industry sectors, we used a linear regression model to predict scores for PIAAC scales—literacy, numeracy, and problem solving in technology-rich environments—based on the independent variables gender, education level, frequency of workplace collaboration, and frequency of sharing work-related information. Results showed level of collaboration at work is negatively associated with PIAAC scores, contradicting current thinking on the role of social interactions in the workplace. We conclude there may be an overemphasis on the social characteristics in job design in some industries and workplaces, leaving little support and time for other activities known to support workplace learning, like management support and time for reflection.
ArntzM.GregoryT.ZierahnU. (2016), The risk of automation for jobs in OECD countries: A comparative analysis (OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Paper No. 189). Paris, France: OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/5jlz9h56dvq7-en
4.
BillettS. (2004). Workplace participatory practices: Conceptualising workplaces as learning environments. Journal of Workplace Learning, 16, 312-324. doi:10.1108/13665620410550295
5.
BillettS.NobleC. (2017). Individuals’ mediation of learning professional practice: Co-working and learning to prescribe. In GollerM.PaloniemiS. (Eds.), Agency at work: An agentic perspective on professional learning and development (pp. 205-277). Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature.
6.
CarmeliA.TishlerA.EdmondsonA. (2012). CEO relational leadership and strategic decision quality in top management teams: The role of team trust and learning from failure. Strategic Organization, 10, 31-54. doi:10.1177/1476127011434797
7.
ConstantD.KieslerS.SproullL. (1994). What’s mine is ours, or is it: A study of attitudes about information sharing. Information Systems Research, 5, 400-421.
8.
DodgsonM. (1993). Learning, trust, and technological collaboration. Human Relations, 46, 77-95.
9.
EdmondsonA. C. (2003). Managing the risk of learning: Psychological safety in work teams. In WestM. A. (Ed.), International handbook of organizational teamwork (pp. 255-277). London, England: Blackwell.
10.
EllingerA. D. (2005). Contextual factors influencing informal learning in a workplace setting: The case of “reinventing itself company.”Human Resource Development Quarterly, 16, 389-415.
11.
ErautM. (2011). Informal learning in the workplace: Evidence on the real value of work-based learning (WBL). Development and Learning in Organizations, 25(5), 8-12.
12.
KilgoC. A.SheetsJ. K. E.PascarellaE. T. (2015). The link between high-impact practices and student learning: Some longitudinal evidence. Higher Education, 69, 509-525.
13.
KimS.LeeH. (2006). The impact of organizational context and information technology on employee knowledge-sharing capabilities. Public Administration Review, 66, 370-385.
14.
KleinJ. D.MooreA. L. (2016). Informal learning in professional and personal life: Implications for instructional design and performance improvement. Educational Technology, 56(1), 21-26.
15.
KuH. Y.TsengH. W.AkarasriwornC. (2013). Collaboration factors, teamwork satisfaction, and student attitudes toward online collaborative learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 922-929.
16.
KwakmanK. (2003). Factors affecting teachers’ participation in professional learning activities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19, 149-170.
17.
LathamD.JulienH.GrossM.WitteS. (2016). The role of inter-professional collaboration to support science learning: An exploratory study of the perceptions and experiences of science teachers, public librarians, and school librarians. Library & Information Science Research, 38, 193-201.
ManutiA.PastoreS.ScardignoA. F.GiancasproM. L.MorcianoD. (2015). Formal and informal learning in the workplace: A research review. International Journal of Training and Development, 19, 1-17.
20.
MarsickV. J.WatkinsK. E. (2015). Informal and incidental learning in the workplace. New York, NY: Routledge.
21.
MarsickV. J.WatkinsK. E. (2018). Introduction to the special issue: An update on informal and incidental learning theory. New Directions for Adult & Continuing Education, 2018(159), 9-19.
22.
MassingN.GaulyB. (2017). Training participation and gender: Analyzing individual barriers across different welfare state regimes. Adult Education Quarterly, 67, 266-285. doi:10.1177/0741713617715706
23.
McDonoughT. (2017). Closing the skills gap: Key learnings for employers and job seekers. Employment Relations Today, 43(4), 49-54.
OlsenD. S.TikkanenT. (2018). The developing field of workplace learning and the contribution of PIAAC. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 37, 546-559. doi:10.1080/02601370.2018.1497720
26.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2009). PIAAC BQ JRA V5.0: Conceptual framework. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/edu/48865373.pdf
Russ-EftD. (2002). A typology of training design and work environment factors affecting workplace learning and transfer. Human Resource Development Review, 1, 45-65.
32.
SannerB.BundersonJ. S. (2015). When feeling safe isn’t enough: Contextualizing models of safety and learning in teams. Organizational Psychology Review, 5, 224-243. doi:10.1177/2041386614565145
33.
SchwartzG. J. (2019). An examination of key factors that influence employee learning in the workplace. In KenonV. H.PalsoleS. V. (Eds.), The Wiley handbook of global workplace learning (pp. 447-500). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
34.
SkuleS. (2014). Learning conditions at work: A framework to understand and assess informal learning in the workplace. International Journal of Training and Development, 8, 8-20.
35.
SonnenwaldD. H. (1995). Contested collaboration: A descriptive model of intergroup communication in information system design. Information Processing & Management, 31, 859-877.
36.
SonnenwaldD. H.PierceL. G. (2000). Information behavior in dynamic group work contexts: Interwoven situational awareness, dense social networks and contested collaboration in command and control. Information Processing & Management, 36, 461-79.
37.
SteensmaH. K. (1996). Acquiring technological competencies through inter-organizational collaboration: An organizational learning perspective. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 12, 267-286.
38.
StørenL. A.LundetræK.BøringP. (2018). Country differences in numeracy skills: How do they vary by job characteristics and education levels?International Journal of Lifelong Education, 37, 578-597. doi:10.1080/02601370.2018.1554718
39.
ThomsonA.PerryJ. (2006). Collaboration processes: Inside the black box. Public Administration Review, 66, 20-32. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00663.x
40.
TikkanenT. (2002). Learning at work in technology intensive environments. Journal of Workplace Learning, 14, 89-97.
YangT. M.MaxwellT. A. (2011). Information-sharing in public organizations: A literature review of interpersonal, intra-organizational and inter-organizational success factors. Government Information Quarterly, 28, 164-175.
44.
ZoethoutH.WesselinkR.RunhaarP.MulderM. (2017). Using transactivity to understand emergence of team learning. Small Group Research, 8, 190-214.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
