This article addresses a significant problem with transformative learning theory; namely, that it is increasingly being used to refer to almost any instance of learning. This article offers several points of clarity to resolve this problem. First, it portrays a subtle but important evolution in the way the theory has been used in the literature and, as a solution, positions transformative learning as an analytic metatheory. It then presents a typology of transformative learning outcomes as a conceptual tool scholars can use to describe learning phenomena. Finally, this article suggests a definition and criteria for transformative learning to provide parameters around the phenomena that the metatheory of transformative learning should address.
AldridgeJ.KubyP.StrevyD. (1992). Developing a metatheory of education. Psychological Reports, 70, 683-687. doi:10.2466/PRO.70.3.683-687
2.
BrookfieldS. (2003). Putting the critical back into critical pedagogy: A commentary on the path of dissent. Journal of Transformative Education, 1, 141-149. doi:10.1177/1541344603001002007
3.
ByrnesK. (2012). A portrait of contemplative teaching: Embracing wholeness. Journal of Transformative Education, 10, 22-41. doi:10.1177/1541344612456431
4.
ChapmanV. L. (2005). Attending to the theoretical landscape in adult education. Adult Education Quarterly, 55, 308-312.
5.
ChinS. S. (2006). I am a human being, and I belong to the world: Narrating the intersection of spirituality and social identity. Journal of Transformative Education, 4, 27-42. doi:10.1177/1541344605283090
6.
CunninghamP. M. (1992). From Freire to feminism: The North American experience with critical pedagogy. Adult Education Quarterly, 42, 180-191.
7.
CunninghamP. M. (1993). Let’s get real: A critical look at the practice of adult education. Journal of Adult Education, 22, 3-15.
8.
DirkxJ. M. (2012). Nurturing soul work: A Jungian approach to transformative learning. In TaylorE.CrantonP. (Eds.), The handbook of transformative learning: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 116-130). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
9.
GerbicP.StaceyE. (2005). A purposive approach to content analysis: Designing analytical frameworks. Internet and Higher Education, 8, 45-59. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.12.003
10.
GunnlaugsonO. (2004). Toward an integral education for the ecozoic era: A case study in transforming the global learning community of Holma College of Integral Studies, Sweden. Journal of Transformative Education, 2, 313-335. doi:10.1177/1541344604267197
11.
HoareC. (2006). Handbook of adult development and learning. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
12.
HoferB. (2002). Personal epistemology as a psychological and educational construct: An introduction. In HoferB.PintrichP. (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 3-14). New York, NY: Routledge.
13.
HogganC. (2015). The varieties of transformative experience: A review of the transformative learning literature. Manuscript submitted for publication.
14.
HsiehH.ShannonS. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15, 1277-1288. doi:10.1177/1049732305276687
15.
KeganR. (2000). What “form” transforms? A constructive-developmental approach to transformative learning. In MezirowJ. (Ed.), Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress (pp. 35-70). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
16.
MayoP. (2003). A rationale for a transformative approach to education. Journal of Transformative Education, 1, 38-57. doi:10.1177/1541344602250400
17.
MezirowJ. (1978). Education for perspective transformation: Women’s re-entry programs in community colleges. New York, NY: Teachers College, Columbia University.
18.
MezirowJ. (1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
19.
MezirowJ. (2000). Learning to think like an adult. In MezirowJ. (Ed.), Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress (pp. 3-34). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
20.
NewmanM. (2012a). Calling transformative learning into question: Some mutinous thoughts. Adult Education Quarterly, 62, 36-55. doi:10.1177/0741713610392768
21.
NewmanM. (2012b). Michael Newman’s final comments in the forum on his article “Calling transformative learning into question: Some mutinous thoughts.”Adult Education Quarterly, 62, 406-411. doi:10.1177/0741713612456421
TaylorE. (2007). An update of transformative learning theory: A critical review of the empirical research (1999–2005). International Journal of Lifelong Education, 26, 173-191.
27.
TaylorE.SnyderM. (2012). A critical review of research on transformative learning theory, 2006-2010. In TaylorE.CrantonP. (Eds.), The handbook of transformative learning: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 37-55). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
28.
WallaceW. (1992). Metatheory, conceptual standardization and the future of sociology. In RitzerG. (Ed.), Metatheorizing (pp. 53-68). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
29.
YorksL.KaslE. (2006). I know more than I can say: A taxonomy for using expressive ways of knowing to foster transformative learning. Journal of Transformative Education, 4, 43-64. doi:10.1177/1541344605283151
