Mezirow’s theory of perspective transformation has proved to be a great asset to the scholarship of adult education and has provided a solid theoretical base for understanding complex learning phenomena. However, in the discussions surrounding Mezirow’s work, a certain “stuckness” appears which we think is unproductive. Critiques of Mezirow are often repeated, secondhand or thirdhand, causing important issues and tensions to become simplified and dichotomized, which causes complex aspects of the theory to lose the nuance that a good theory provides. This article draws on recent contributions to the literature in order to elaborate on the theory of perspective transformation in light of these recurring critiques. In so doing, we introduce three key concepts to the lexicon of perspective transformation: continuity, intersubjectivity, and emancipatory praxis. For each, we address the underlying omission or weakness in Mezirow’s theory and offer revised conceptualizations of the theory.
AlheitP.DausienB. (2000). Biographicity as a basic resource of lifelong learning. In AlheitP.KammlerE.TaylorR.OlesenH. S. (Eds.), Lifelong learning inside and outside schools: Collected papers of the European conference on lifelong learning (pp. 400-422). Roskilde, Denmark: Roskilde University.
2.
BaumanZ.TesterK. (2001). Conversations with Zygmunt Bauman. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
3.
BeckU. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London, England: Sage.
4.
BergerJ. G. (2004). Dancing on the threshold of meaning: Recognizing and understanding the growing edge. Journal of Transformative Education, 2, 336-351. doi:10.1177/1541344604267697
5.
BrockettR.BrockettG. (Ed.). (1988). Ethical issues in adult education. New York, NY: Teachers College, Columbia University.
6.
BrookfieldS. (1994). Tales from the dark side: A phenomenography of adult critical reflection. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 13, 203-216.
7.
ClarkM. C.WilsonA. L. (1991). Context and rationality in Mezirow’s theory of transformational learning. Adult Education Quarterly, 41, 75-91.
8.
CollardS.LawM. (1989). The limits of perspective transformation: A critique of Mezirow’s theory. Adult Education Quarterly, 39, 99-107.
9.
CrantonP.HogganC. (2012). Evaluating transformative learning. In TaylorE.CrantonP. (Eds.), Handbook of transformative learning (pp. 520-535). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
10.
CrantonP.TaylorE. (2012). Transformative learning theory: Seeking a more unified theory. In TaylorE. W.CrantonP. (Eds.), The handbook of transformative learning: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 3-20). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
11.
CunninghamP. M. (1998). The social dimension of transformative learning. PAACE Journal of Lifelong Learning, 7, 15-28.
12.
DamasioA. R. (1999). The feeling of what happens: Body and emotion in the making of consciousness. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace.
13.
DeweyJ. (1938). Experience and education. New York, NY: Collier Books.
14.
DirkxJ. (2008). The meaning and role of emotions in adult learning. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 120, 7-18.
15.
EttlingD. (2012). Educator as change agent: Ethics of transformative learning. In TaylorE. W.CrantonP. (Eds.), The handbook of transformative learning: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 536-551). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
16.
FinneganF. (2011). Learning as transformation or adaptation? Thinking with and against Mezirow and Bourdieu. In Alhadeff-JonesM.KokkosA. (Eds.), Transformative learning in time of crisis: Individual and collective challenges (pp. 80-88). New York, NY: Teachers College, Columbia University.
17.
FinneganF. (2014a, July). Embodied experience, transformative learning and social change: Notes on a theory of social learning. Paper presented at ESREA (European Society for the Education of Adults), Interrogating Transformative Processes in Learning and Education Network, Athens, Greece.
18.
FinneganF. (2014b). Embodied experience, transformative learning and the production of space. In NicolaidesA.HoltD. (Eds.), Spaces of transformation and transformation of space. Proceedings of the 11th International Transformative Learning Conference (pp. 557-564). New York, NY: Teachers College, Columbia University.
19.
FreireP. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed (RamosM. B., Trans.). New York, NY: Continuum.
20.
HabermasJ. (1984). Theory of communicative action, Volume 1: Reason and the rationalization of society. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
21.
HartM. (1990). Critical theory and beyond: Further perspectives on emancipatory education. Adult Education Quarterly, 40, 125-138.
22.
HogganC. (2014). Insights from breast cancer survivors: The interplay between context, epistemology, and change. Adult Education Quarterly, 64, 191-205.
23.
HogganC. (2016). Transformative learning as a metatheory: Definition, criteria, and typology. Adult Education Quarterly, 66, 57-75.
24.
HorkheimerM. (2002). Critical theory: Selected essays. New York, NY: Continuum.
25.
HortonM. (2003). The Myles Horton reader: Education for social change. Knoxville: Tennessee University Press.
26.
IllerisK. (2014). Transformative learning and identity. New York, NY: Routledge.
27.
InglisT. (1997). Empowerment and emancipation. Adult Education Quarterly, 48, 3-17.
28.
KitchenhamA. (2008). The evolution of John Mezirow’s transformative learning theory. Journal of Transformative Education, 6, 104-123.
29.
LawrenceR. (2008). Powerful feelings: Exploring the affective domain of informal and arts-based learning. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 120, 65-77.
30.
MalinenA. (2000). Towards the essence of adult experiential learning: A reading of the theories of Knowles, Kolb, Mezirow, Revans and Schön. Jyväskylä, Finland: Jyväskylän yliopisto.
31.
MälkkiK. (2010). Building on Mezirow’s theory of transformative learning: Theorizing the challenges to reflection. Journal of Transformative Education, 8, 42-62.
MälkkiK. (2012). Rethinking disorienting dilemmas within real-life crises: The role of reflection in negotiating emotionally chaotic experiences. Adult Education Quarterly, 62, 207-229.
34.
MälkkiK.GreenL. (2014). Navigational aids: The phenomenology of transformative learning. Journal of Transformative Education, 12, 5-24.
MezirowJ. (1997). Transformation theory out of context. Adult Education Quarterly, 48, 60-62.
43.
MezirowJ. (2000). Learning to think like an adult. In MezirowJ. (Ed.), Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress (pp. 3-34). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
44.
MezirowJ. (2007). Adult education and empowerment for individual and community development. In ConnollyB.FlemingT.McCormackD.RyanA. (Eds.), Radical learning for liberation 2 (pp. 10-17). Maynooth, Ireland: MACE.
45.
MurrayM. (2013). What happens in the classroom stays in the classroom: The limits to the transformative approach to education for political citizenship (ISSN No. 0790-8040). Adult Learner, 2013, 15-28.
46.
NewmanM. (1994). Defining the enemy: Adult education in social action. Sydney, New South Wales, Australia: Stewart Victor.
47.
NewmanM. (2012). Calling transformative learning into question: Some mutinous thoughts. Adult Education Quarterly, 62, 36-55. doi:10.1177/0741713610392768
48.
PiagetJ. (1954). The construction of reality in the child. New York, NY: Basic Books.
49.
SandsD.TennantM. (2010). Transformative learning in the context of suicide bereavement. Adult Education Quarterly, 60, 99-121. doi:10.1177/0741713609349932
50.
SennettR. (1998). The corrosion of character: The personal consequences of work in the new capitalism. New York, NY: Norton.
51.
TaylorE. W. (1997). Building upon the theoretical debate: A critical review of the empirical studies of Mezirow’s transformative learning theory. Adult Education Quarterly, 48, 34-59. doi:10.1177/074171369704800104
52.
TaylorE. W. (2005). Meaning making of the varied and contested perspectives of transformative learning theory. In VlosakD.KilebasoG.RadfordJ. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Transformative Learning (pp. 448-457). East Lansing: Michigan State University.
53.
TaylorE. W. (2008). Transformative learning theory. In MerriamS. B. (Ed.), New directions for adult and continuing education (pp. 5-15). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
54.
TaylorE. W.SnyderM. (2012). A critical review of research on transformative learning theory, 2006-2010. In TaylorE.CrantonP. (Eds.), The handbook of transformative learning: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 37-55). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
55.
TillyC. (2004). Social movements, 1768-2004. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.
56.
WestL.FlemingT.FinneganF. (2013). Connecting Bourdieu, Winnicott, and Honneth: Understanding the experiences of non-traditional learners through an interdisciplinary lens. Studies in the Education of Adults, 45, 119-134.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
