This qualitative cross-case study explored the experiences that learners describe within online collaborative groups. The study context was a fully online graduate course on adult learning. The findings suggest that the small online groups demonstrated dynamics and process that are characteristic of individual growth and development and group individuation, which mirror the experiences of face-to-face groups. The results of these two developmental processes led to unsafe learning spaces and opportunities for group members to rework their sense of identity as learners and group members. Implications are presented for the use of these kinds of groups in online educational settings.
Ball Foundation. (2002). Education initiatives. Retrieved November 12, 2004, from http://www.ballfoundation.org/ei/tools/consensus.html
2.
Barr, R. B., & Tagg, J. (1995). From teaching to learning—A newparadigm for undergraduate education. Change, 2 (5), 13-25.
3.
Barrows, H. S. (1994). Practice-based learning: Problem-based learning applied to medical education. Springfield: Southern Illinois University of School of Medicine.
4.
Bee, H. (1992). The journey of adulthood. New York: Macmillan.
5.
Bennis, W. G., & Shepard, H. A. (1956). Atheory of group development. Human Relations, 9, 415-457.
6.
Berdal, J. L., & Craig, K. M. (1996). Equality of participation and influence in groups: The effects of communication medium and sex composition. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 4 (2/3), 179-201.
7.
Bernard, R. M., Beatriz, R. D., & St. Piere, D. (2000). Collaborative online distance learning: Issues for future practice and research. Distance Education, 21 (2), 260-277.
8.
Bion, W. R. (1961). Experiences in groups and other papers. New York: Basic Books.
9.
Boud, D., & Feletti, G. I. (1991). Changing problem-based learning: Introduction to the second edition. In D. Boud& G.I. Feletti (Eds.), The challenge of problem-based learning (2nd ed., pp. 1-14). London: Kogan Page.
10.
Bruffee, K. A. (1999). Collaborative learning: Higher education, interdependence, and the authority of knowledge (2nd ed.). Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
11.
Cheng, D. W., Chae, M., & Gunn, R. W. (1998). Splitting and projective identification in multicultural group counseling. Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 23 (4), 372-387.
12.
Christensen, R. C., & Hansen, A. J. (1986). Teaching the case method. Boston: Harvard Business School.
13.
Clarebout, G., & Elsen, J. (2001). The Parl Eu Net-project: Problems with the validation of socioconstructivist design principles in ecological settings. Computers in Human Behavior, 17 (5/6), 453-464.
14.
Cresswell, J. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15.
de Lisser, E. (1999, October 5). Update on small business: Firms with virtual environments appeal to workers. The Wall Street Journal, p. B2-B2.
16.
Dirkx, J. M., & Smith, R. O., (2004). Thinking out of a bowl of spaghetti: Learning to learn in online collaborative groups. In T. Roberts (Ed.), Online collaborative learning: Theory and practice (pp. 132-159). Hershey, PA: Idea Group.
17.
Flick, U. (1998). An introduction to qualitative research: Theory, method, and applications. London: Sage.
18.
Gibbard, G. S. (1974). Individuation, fusion, and role specialization. In G. Gibbard, J. J. Hartman, & R. D. Mann (Eds.), Analysis of groups (pp. 247-265). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
19.
Harasim, L. (1987). Teaching and learning on-line: Issues in computer-mediated graduate courses. Canadian Journal of Educational Communication, 16 (2), 117-135.
20.
Hartman, J. .J., & Gibbard, G. S. (1974). Anote on fantasy themes in the evolution of group culture. In G. Gibbard, J. J. Hartman, & R. D. Mann (Eds.), Analysis of groups (pp. 315-336). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
21.
Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Toward a design of a problem solving theory. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48 (4), 63-85.
22.
Kegan, R. (1982). The evolving self: Problem and process in human development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
23.
Kegan, R. (1994). In over our heads: The mental demands of modern life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
24.
Laurillard, D. (2002). The design methodology. London: Routledge/Falmer.
25.
Lauzon, A. C. (2000). Distance education and diversity: Are they compatible?American Journal of Distance Education, 14 (2), 61-70.
McConnell, D. (2002). Action research and distributed problem-based learning in continuing professional education. Distance Education, 23 (1), 59-83.
28.
McKnight, C. (2000). Teaching critical thinking through online discussions. Educause Quarterly, 4, 39-42.
29.
Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
30.
Merriam, S. B., & Caffarella, R. S. (1999). Learning in adulthood (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
31.
Miller, J. E., Trimbur, J., & Wilkes, J. M. (1994). Group dynamics: Understanding group success and failure in collaborative learning. In K. Bosworth & S. J. Hamilton (Eds.), Collaborative learning: Underlying processes and effective techniques (pp. 33-44). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
32.
Newcomb, T. (1962). Student peer group influence. In T. Newcomb & E. Wilson (Eds.), The American college: A psychological and social interpretation of higher learning (pp. 481-495). New York: Wiley.
33.
Oliver, R., & Omari, A. (2001). Student responses to collaborating and learning in a Web-based environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 17 (1), 34-47.
34.
O’Reilly, C. A., Williams, K. Y., & Barsade, S. (1998). Group demography and innovation: Does diversity help? In D. Gruenfield& M. A. Neale (Eds.), Research on managing in groups and teams (Vol. 1, pp. 183-207). Stamford, CT: JAI.
35.
Phipps, R., & Merisotis, J. (1999, April). What’s the difference? A review of contemporary research on the effectiveness of distance learning in higher education. A report from the Institute for Higher Education Policy. Retrieved April 15, 1999, from http://www.ihep.com/PUB.htm
36.
Ragoonaden, K., & Bordeleau, P. (2000). Collaborative learning via the Internet. Educational Technology & Society, 3 (3). Retrieved February 20, 2004, from http://ifets.ieee.org/periodical/vol_3_2000/d11.html
37.
Reeves, B., & Nass, C. (1996). The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
38.
Rosser, S. V. (1997). Re-engineering female friendly science. New York: Teachers College Press.
39.
Sage, S. M. (2000, April). The learning and teaching experiences in an online problem-based learning course. Paper presented at the American Education Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
40.
Schön D. (1990). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
41.
Schrum, L. (1998). On-line education: A study of emerging pedagogy. In B. Cahoon (Ed.), Adult learning and the Internet. New directions for adult and continuing education (No. 8, pp. 53-62). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
42.
Smith, K. K., & Berg, D. N. (1987). Paradoxes of group life: Understanding conflict, paralysis, and movement in group dynamics. San Francisco: New Lexington Press.
43.
Smith, R. O. (2003). The struggle for voice: Student experiences in collaborative online groups. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, East Lansing.
44.
Smith, R. O., & Dirkx, J. M. (2003). Lost in familiar places: The struggle for voice and belonging in online adult learning groups. In the Proceedings of the 22nd Midwest Research to Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing, and Community Education (pp. 187-192). Columbus: Ohio State University.
45.
Straus, S. G., & McGrath, J. E. (1994). Does the medium matter? The interaction of task type and technology on group performance and memberreactions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79 (1), 87-97.
46.
Tan, O. S. (2003). Students’ experiences in problem-based learning: Three blind mice episode or educational innovation?Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 41 (2), 169-184.
47.
Trujillo, C. (1997). The application of W. R. Bion’s group process construct to computer-mediated communications (CMC). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Fielding Institute, Santa Barbara, CA.
48.
Tuckman, B. W. (1965). Developmental sequences in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63, 384-389.
49.
Unger, R. M. (1984). Passion: An essay on personality. New York: Free Press.
50.
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher mental process. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
51.
Web-Based Commission. (2000). The power of the Internet for learning: Moving from promise to practice. Retrieved April 29, 2003, from http://www.hpcnet.org/webcommission
52.
Wells, L. J. (1995). The group-as-a-whole: A systemic socioanalytic perspective on interpersonal and group relations. In J. Gillette& M. McCollom (Eds.), Groups in context: A new perspective on group dynamics (pp. 50-85). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
53.
Wheelan, S. A. (1994). Group processes: A developmental perspective. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
54.
Winters, S. K. (1974). Interracial dynamics in self-analytic groups. In G. Gibbard, J. J. Hartman,& R. D. Mann (Eds.), Analysis of groups (pp. 197-219). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
