Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This study investigates collaborative interdisciplinary research writing at a large public Western U.S. university through surveys, interviews, focus groups, and textual analyses. While 75% of faculty at this institution supported campuswide interdisciplinary initiatives, only 31% believed current institutional structures enhanced such work—a 44-percentage-point gap that our analysis suggests stemmed from five key obstacles to successful interdisciplinary writing: structural barriers, career concerns (particularly for pre-tenure faculty), disciplinary cultural differences, terminological conflicts, and divergent goals between faculty and administrators. Faculty in this study focused on immediate practical challenges and professional development, while administrators prioritize institutional transformation and structural change. The study concludes with recommendations relevant for universities with comparable resources and commitment to Writing Studies informed approaches, including revised tenure guidelines that explicitly value interdisciplinary contributions, dedicated funding mechanisms, facilitated networking opportunities, and targeted writing support programs. By addressing faculty’s practical needs and administrators’ strategic vision, institutions can create environments where collaborative boundary-crossing becomes not just possible but sustainable and rewarding.

Keywords

interdisciplinarity writing collaboration research institutions multi-methods

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anthony

(2022). AntConc (4.2.4) [Computer software]. Retrieved June 4, 2023, from https://www.laurenceanthony.net/software.html

Bammer

(2013). Disciplining interdisciplinarity: Integration and implementation sciences for researching complex real-world problems. ANU Press.

Bergen

Hudani

Khan

Montgomery

N. D.

O’Sullivan

(2020). Practical considerations for establishing writing groups in interdisciplinary programs. Palgrave Communications, 6(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-0395-6

Canton

(2025). A portfolio approach to research funding. Research Policy, 54(1), 105129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2024.105129

Corcoran

(2019). Addressing the “Bias Gap”: A research-driven argument for critical support of plurilingual scientists’ research writing. Written Communication, 36(4), 538–577. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088319861648

Cvitanovic

Colvin

R. M.

Reynolds

K. J.

Platow

M. J.

(2020). Applying an organizational psychology model for developing shared goals in interdisciplinary research teams. One Earth, 2(1), 75–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2019.12.010

Douard

Samet

Giakos

Cavallucci

(2025). Quantifying interdisciplinarity in scientific articles using deep learning toward a TRIZ-based framework for cross-disciplinary innovation. Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction, 7(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/make7010007

Frietsch

Gruber

Bornmann

(2025). The definition of highly cited researchers: The effect of different approaches on the empirical outcome. Scientometrics, 130, 881–907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-024-05158-1

Frith

(2020). Technical standards and a theory of writing as infrastructure. Written Communication, 37(3), 401–427. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088320916553

10.

Goldsmith

L. J.

(2021). Using framework analysis in applied qualitative research. Qualitative Report, 26(6), 2061–2076.

11.

Graff

H. J.

(2015). Undisciplining knowledge: Interdisciplinarity in the Twentieth Century. Johns Hopkins University Press.

12.

Hendren

Newcomer

Pandey

S. K.

Smith

Sumner

(2023). How qualitative research methods can be leveraged to strengthen mixed methods research in public policy and public administration? Public Administration Review, 83(3), 468–485. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13528

13.

Heron

Gravett

Yakovchuk

(2021). Publishing and flourishing: Writing for desire in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 40(3), 538–551. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1773770

14.

Jain

(2021). Survey versus interviews: Comparing data collection tools for exploratory research. The Qualitative Report, 26(2), 541–554. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2021.4492

15.

Kaufhold

McGrath

(2019). Revisiting the role of ‘discipline’ in writing for publication in two social sciences. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 40, 115–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2019.06.006

16.

Lei

Liu

(2024). Understanding teams and productivity in information retrieval research (2000–2018): Academia, industry, and cross-community collaborations. arXiv:2410.01541.

17.

Mäkinen

E. I.

Evans

E. D.

McFarland

D. A.

(2025). Interdisciplinary research, tenure review, and guardians of the disciplinary order. The Journal of Higher Education, 96(1), 54–81.

18.

Mengist

Soromessa

Legese

(2020). Method for conducting systematic literature review and meta-analysis for environmental science research. MethodsX, 7, 100777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2019.100777

19.

Mohamed Shaffril

H. A.

Samsuddin

S. F.

Abu Samah

. (2021). The ABC of systematic literature review: The basic methodological guidance for beginners. Quality & Quantity, 55(4), 1319–1346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-020-01059-6

20.

Murphy

(2023). The questionnaire surveying research method: Pros, cons and best practices. ScienceOpen Preprints, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.14293/S2199-1006.1.SOR-.PP3WYS8.v1

21.

Natow

R. S.

(2020). The use of triangulation in qualitative studies employing elite interviews. Qualitative Research, 20(2), 160–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794119830077

22.

Negretti

(2021). Searching for metacognitive generalities: Areas of convergence in learning to write for publication across doctoral students in science and engineering. Written Communication, 38(2), 167–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088320984796

23.

Newman

(2024). Promoting interdisciplinary research collaboration: A systematic review, a critical literature review, and a pathway forward. Social Epistemology, 38(2), 135–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2023.2172694

24.

Pelikan

Jeffery

Roelcke

(2021). ‘The time where the British took the lead is over’: Ethical aspects of writing in complex research partnerships. Research Ethics, 17(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016120915253

25.

Ramos-Vielba

Bloch

Thomas

D. A.

Povlsen

R. E.

Falkenberg

M. L.

Stage

A. K.

(2024). How can societally-targeted research funding shape researcher networks and practices? Research Evaluation, rvae019. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvae019

26.

Read

(2019). The infrastructural function: A relational theory of infrastructure for writing studies. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 33(3), 233–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651919834980

27.

Ren

Xie

(2025). Assessing co-authored papers in tenure decisions: Implications for research independence and career strategies in economics. arXiv:2501.05653.

28.

Sauer

P. C.

Seuring

(2023). How to conduct systematic literature reviews in management research: A guide in 6 steps and 14 decisions. Review of Managerial Science, 17(5), 1899–1933. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-023-00668-3

29.

Siddaway

A. P.

Wood

A. M.

Hedges

L. V.

(2019). How to do a systematic review: A best practice guide for conducting and reporting narrative reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses. Annual Review of Psychology, 70(1), 747–770. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803

30.

Snyder

(2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

31.

Vogel

M. T.

Abu-Rish Blakeney

Willgerodt

M. A.

Odegard

P. S.

Johnson

E. L.

Shrader

Liner

Dyer

C. A.

Hall

L. W.

Zierler

(2019). Interprofessional education and practice guide: Interprofessional team writing to promote dissemination of interprofessional education scholarship and products. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 33(5), 406–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2018.1538111

32.

Walters

B. B.

(2024). Doing interdisciplinary environmental change research solo. Economic Botany, 78(1), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12231-023-09584-9

33.

Wilder

(2021). Another voice in the room: Negotiating authority in multidisciplinary writing groups. Written Communication, 38(2), 247–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088320986540

34.

Wise

van Luyn

(2020). Not ‘all writing is creative writing’ and that’s OK: Inter/disciplinary collaboration in writing and writing studies. TEXT, 24(Special 59), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.52086/001c.23485

Faculty and Administrator Perceptions of Interdisciplinary Collaborative Writing: Practices,Challenges,and Support Structures

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References