Because evidence is still limited on writing motivation around the globe and the factors that could influence it, a survey-based quantitative study with 2,067 Costa Rican students from first to sixth grade (84 classrooms in 4 schools) was conducted to explore variations in two constructs of motivation for school writing across school grades and gender in Costa Rican students. Attitudes towards writing were investigated with students from first to sixth grade, while self-efficacy beliefs towards writing were investigated with students from third to sixth grade. Results show that students’ positive attitudes towards writing decreased with grade level, with the highest positive attitudes found in second grade and the lowest in sixth grade. Grade level only determined students’ perceived self-efficacy for generating ideas and concentrating during writing, but not for punctuation and spelling, which is interpreted in relation to the Costa Rican writing education curriculum. Girls from second to sixth grade reported more positive attitudes towards writing than boys; however, they only had higher self-efficacy beliefs for generating ideas and not for punctuation, spelling, or concentrating on a writing task.
Alves-WoldA.WalgermoB. R.McTigueE.UppstadP. H. (2023). Assessing writing motivation: A systematic review of K-5 students’ self-reports. Educational Psychology Review, 35(1), 24.
2.
Alves-WoldA.WalgermoB. R.McTigueE.UppstadP. H. (2024). The ABCs of writing motivation: A systematic review of factors emerging from K–5 students’ self-reports as influencing their motivation to write. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1396484.
3.
BanduraA. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28(2), 117–148. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2802_3
4.
BanduraA. (2010). Self-efficacy. In WeinerI. B.CraigheadW. E. (Eds.), The Corsini encyclopedia of psychology (4th ed., Vol. 5, pp. 1–3). John Wiley & Sons.
5.
BerningerV. W.VaughanK.AbbottR. D.BegayK.ColemanK. B.CurtinG.HawkinsJ. M.GrahamS. (2002). Teaching spelling and composition alone and together: Implications for the simple view of writing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 291.
6.
BoscoloP. (2023). Motivation to write. In HorowitzR. (Ed.), The Routledge international handbook of research on writing (pp. 493–507). Routledge.
7.
BoscoloP.GelatiC. (2019). Motivating writers. Best Practices in Writing Instruction, 51–78.
8.
BoscoloP.HidiS. (2006). Writing and motivation. Brill.
9.
BruningR.HornC. (2000). Developing motivation to write. Educational Psychologist, 35(1), 25–37.
10.
CamachoA.AlvesR. A.BoscoloP. (2021). Writing motivation in school: A systematic review of empirical research in the early twenty-first century. Educational Psychology Review, 33, 213–247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09530-4
11.
CamachoA.AlvesR.DanielJ.De SmedtF.Van KeerH. (2022). Structural relations among implicit theories, achievement goals, and performance in writing. Learning and Individual Differences, 100, 102223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2022.102223
12.
ConchaS.EspinosaM. J. (2023). The Chilean national writing plan: Rationale, actions, and preliminary results. In SpinilloA. G.SotomayorC. (Eds.), Development of Writing Skills in Children in Diverse Cultural Contexts (pp. 353–372). Springer.
13.
ConchaS.EspinosaM. J.ReyesJ. (2022). Actitud y Percepción de Autoeficacia sobre la Escritura en Estudiantes Chilenos de 3º Básico a 3º Medio. PSYKHE, 31(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.7764/psykhe.2020.21759
14.
CordeiroC.CastroS. L.LimpoT. (2018). Examining potential sources of gender differences in writing: The role of handwriting fluency and self-efficacy beliefs. Written Communication, 35(4), 448–473. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088318788843
15.
de Caso-FuertesA. M.García SánchezJ.-N. (2006). Relación entre la motivación y la escritura. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 38(3), 477–492.
16.
Didactext. (2003). Modelo sociocognitivo, pragmalingüístico y didáctico para la producción de textos escritos. Didáctica. Lengua y Literatura, 15, 77–104.
EspinosaM. J. (2018). Enseñanza de la escritura en la escuela: qué, cómo y por qué enseñan así los docentes (Tesis de Doctorado). Universidad Diego Portales y Universidad Alberto Hurtado.
19.
Flores-FerrésM.van WeijenD.RijlaarsdamG. (2020). Teachers’ writing practices and contextual features in grades 7-12 of chilean public schools. Journal of Writing Research, 12(2), 365–417.
20.
García GuzmánA.Salvador MataF. (2006). La autopercepción de eficacia en la escritura: una revisión de investigaciones. Enseñanza & Teaching: Revista Interuniversitaria De Didáctica, 24, 19–99.
GrahamS.BerningerV.FanW. (2007). The structural relationship between writing attitude and writing achievement in first and third grade students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32(3), 516–536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2007.01.002
GrahamS.HarrisK. R. (2019). Evidence-based practices in writing. In GrahamS.MacArthurC. A.HebertM. (Eds.), Best practices in writing instruction (3rd ed., pp. 3–28). Guilford Press.
25.
GrahamS.HarrisK. R.KiuharaS. A.FishmanE. J. (2017). The relationship among strategic writing behavior, writing motivation, and writing performance with young, developing writers. The Elementary School Journal, 118(1), 82–104. https://doi.org/10.1086/693009
26.
GrahamS.RijlaarsdamG. (2016). Writing education around the globe: Introduction and call for a new global analysis. Reading and Writing, 29, 781–792.
27.
HayesJ. R. (1996). A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing. In LevyC. M.RansdellS. (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications (pp. 1–27). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
28.
HayesJ. R. (2000). A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing. In IndrisanoR.SquireJ. R. (Eds.), Perspectives on writing: Research, theory, and practice (pp. 6–44). International Reading Association.
29.
HayesJ. R.FlowerL.SchriverK. A.StratmanJ. F.CareyL. (1987). Cognitive processes in revision. In RosenbergS. (Ed.), Advances in applied psycholinguistics: Vol. 1. Disorders of first-language development; Vol. 2. Reading, writing, and language learning (pp. 176–240). Cambridge University Press.
HidiS.BoscoloP. (2006). Motivation and writing. In MacArthurC. A.GrahamS.FitzgeraldJ. (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 144–157). Guilford Press.
32.
KlineR. B. (2023). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford Publications.
33.
LipsteinR. L.RenningerK. A. (2007). “Putting things into words”: The development of 12–15 year-old students’ interest for writing. In HidiS.BoscoloP. (Eds.), Writing and motivation (pp. 113–140). Elsevier.
34.
Martínez-CocóB.de Caso FuertesA. M.García SánchezJ.-N. (2009). Composición escrita y motivación: una perspectiva de desarrollo. Aula Abierta, 37(1), 129–140.
McCartheyS. J.GarcíaG. E. (2005). English language learners’ writing practices and attitudes. Written Communication, 22(1), 36–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088304271830
37.
NgC.GrahamS.LiuX.LauK.TangK. (2021). Relationships between writing motives, writing self‑efficacy and time on writing among Chinese students: Path models and cluster analyses. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 35(2), 427–455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-021-10190-1
38.
OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 Results (Volume I): The State of Learning and Equity in Education, PISA. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en
39.
PajaresF. (2003). Self-efficacy beliefs, motivation, and achievement in writing: A review of the literature. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 19, 139–158.
40.
PajaresF.ValianteG.CheongY. F. (2007). Writing self-efficacy and its relation to gender, writing motivation and writing competence: A developmental perspective. In HidiS.BoscoloP. (Eds.), Writing and motivation (pp. 141–162). Elsevier.
41.
PritchardR.HoneycuttR. (2007). Best practices in implementing a process approach to teaching writing. In GrahamS.MacArthurC.FitzgeraldJ. (Eds.), Best practices in writing instruction (pp. 28–49). The Guilford Press.
42.
RasteiroI.LimpoT. (2023). Examining longitudinal and concurrent links between writing motivation and writing quality in middle school. Written Communication, 40(1), 30–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/07410883221127701
43.
R Core Team. (2024). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
44.
RosseelY. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
45.
SchunkD. H.UsherE. L. (2012). Social cognitive theory and motivation. In RyanR. M. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of human motivation (pp. 13–27). Oxford University Press.
46.
SmagorinskyP.AnglinJ. L.O’Donnell-AllenC. (2012). Identity, meaning, and engagement with school: A native American Student’s composition of a life map in a senior English class. Journal of American Indian Education, 51(1), 22–44. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/798467/summary
47.
SmagorinskyP.DaigleE. A. (2012). The role of affect in student’s writing for school. In GrigorenkoE. L.MambrinoE.PreissD. D. (Eds.), Writing (pp. 293–307). Psychology Press.
48.
UNESCO. (2020). Análisis curricular Estudio Regional Comparativo y Explicativo (ERCE 2019). Costa Rica. Documento nacional de resultados.
49.
WigfieldA.EcclesJ. S. (2000). Expectancy–value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68–81. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1015
50.
WrightK. L.HodgesT. S.DismukeS.BoedekerP. (2020). Writing motivation and middle school: An examination of changes in students’ motivation for writing. Literacy Research and Instruction, 59(2), 148–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2020.1720048
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
