Writing studies must conduct replicable, aggregable, and data-supported (RAD) research to understand the relationship between creativity and writing, including how writers use creative thinking to generate texts and how environmental factors mediate writers’ engagement with creative thinking. This article traces research on creativity from selected writing studies journals since the 2011 release of The Framework for Success in Postsecondary Writing. Through a systematic literature review, the findings show how RAD research supports domain-specific knowledge-building about writers’ creativity, which can help teachers, scholars, and practitioners to understand what counts as originality in writing, how writers produce creative texts, and how educational institutions can teach advanced writing skills that develop students’ creative thinking.
AlexanderK. P.DePalmaM.-J.RingerJ. M. (2016). Adaptive remediation and the facilitation of transfer in multiliteracy center contexts. Computers and Composition, 41, 32–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2016.04.005
2.
AlkhaldiA. A.OzdemirE. A.AlhasanR. F. (2022). ESP creative writing from Engineering students’ perspectives: A case study. International Journal of English Language and Literature Studies, 11(3), 136–146. https://doi.org/10.55493/5019.v11i3.4613
BaerJ. (2012). Domain specificity and the limits of creativity theory. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 46(1), 16–29. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.002
5.
BeatyR. E.BenedekM.SilviaP. J.SchacterD. L. (2016). Creative cognition and brain network dynamics. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(2), 87–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.10.004
6.
BessetteJ. (2016). Audio, archives, and the affordance of listening in a pedagogy of “difference.” Computers and Composition, 39, 72–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2015.11.004
BremnerS.Peirson-SmithA.JonesR.BhatiaV. (2014). Task design and interaction in collaborative writing: The students’ story. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 77(2), 150–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329490613514598
9.
ClokieT. L.FourieE. (2016). Graduate employability and communication competence: Are undergraduates taught relevant skills?Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 79(4), 442–463. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329490616657635
10.
Council of Writing Program Administrators, National Council of Teachers of English, & National Writing Project. (2011). Framework for success in postsecondary writing. 1–16. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED516360.pdf
11.
CrossleyS. A.MuldnerK.McNamaraD. S. (2016). Idea generation in student writing: Computational assessments and links to successful writing. Written Communication, 33(3), 328–354. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088316650178
12.
DriscollD.PerdueS. W. (2012). Theory, lore, and more: An analysis of RAD research in the Writing Center Journal, 1980–2009. Writing Center Journal, 32(1), 11–39.
13.
DuffyB. (1998). Supporting imagination and creativity in the early years. Open University Press.
14.
DweckC. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. Ballantine Books.
15.
ElabdaliR.ArnoldN. (2020). Group dynamics across interaction modes in L2 collaborative wiki writing. Computers and Composition, 58, 102607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2020.102607
16.
EvansT. R.Steptoe-WarrenG. (2018). Humor style clusters: Exploring managerial humor. International Journal of Business Communication, 55(4), 443–454. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488415612478
17.
GardinerP. (2020). Learning to think together: Creativity, interdisciplinary collaboration and epistemic control. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 38, 100749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100749
HenningsenD. D.HenningsenM. L. M. (2022). Exploring the effects of policies promoting political correctness in the workplace. International Journal of Business Communication, 59(4), 583–597. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488419866893
20.
HesseD. (2010). The place of creative writing in composition studies. College Composition and Communication, 62(1), 31–52. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27917883
21.
KooT. K.LiM. Y. (2016). A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 15(2), 155–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012
22.
KoroM.TanggaardL. (2022). Creative methods for creativity research(ers)? Speculations. Review of Research in Education, 46(1), 324–344. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X221090510
23.
LandisJ. R.KochG. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174.
24.
LarsenR. (1988). Flow and writing. In CsikszentmihalyiM.CsikszentmihalyiI. S. (Eds.), Optimal experience: Psychology studies of clow in consciousness (pp. 150–171). Cambridge University Press.
25.
LauringJ.KlitmøllerA. (2017). Inclusive language use in multicultural business organizations: The effect on creativity and performance. International Journal of Business Communication, 54(3), 306–324. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488415572779
MayfieldM.MayfieldJ. (2017). Leader talk and the creative spark: A research note on how leader motivating language use influences follower creative environment perceptions. International Journal of Business Communication, 54(2), 210–225. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488416687057
28.
McDonoughK.CrawfordW. J.MackeyA. (2015). Creativity and EFL students’ language use during a group problem-solving task. TESOL Quarterly, 49(1), 188–199. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.211
29.
MoreauC. (2020). Teams that innovate: The language of difference-driven inquiry at the workplace. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 83(4), 385–408. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329490620949864
30.
NakamuraJ.CsikszentmihalyiM. (2009). Flow theory and research. In SnyderC. R.LopezS. J. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of positive psychology (pp. 195–206). Oxford University Press.
31.
OzerH. Z.ZhangJ. (2021). The response to the call for RAD Research. The Writing Center Journal, 39(1/2), 233–260.
32.
RajanP. (2021). Making when ends don’t meet: Articulation work and visibility of domestic labor during do-it-yourself (DIY) innovation on the margins. Technical Communication Quarterly, 30(4), 315–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2021.1906449
33.
RowellC.FlickA. (2019). “I could get lit to Madonna”: Soundscapes & the first year writer’s composing process. Computers and Composition, 54, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2019.102513
SarrafK. S. (2022). Representations of creativity by posters in freelance writing internet forums. Technical Communication Quarterly, 31(1), 62–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2021.1915387
36.
SarrafK. S. (2023). Tying creative problem-solving to social justice work in technical and professional communication. Technical Communication Quarterly, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2023.2194340
37.
SawyerR. K. (2012). Explaining creativity: The science of human innovation (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
38.
ShepherdR. P. (2018). Digital writing, multimodality, and learning transfer: Crafting connections between composition and online composing. Computers and Composition, 48, 103–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2018.03.001
StillingerJ. (1991). Multiple authorship and the myth of solitary genius. Oxford University Press.
41.
SullivanP. (2015). The unessay: Making room for creativity in the composition classroom. College Composition and Communication, 67(1), 6–34.
42.
TardyC. (2016). Beyond Convention: Genre Innovation in Academic Writing. University of Michigan Press.
43.
TorranceE. P. (1965). Rewarding creative behavior: Experiments in classroom creativity. Prentice-Hall.
44.
TorranceE. P. (1966). Torrance tests of creative thinking: Norms-technical manual (Research ed.). Personnel Press.
45.
TorranceE. P. (1988). The nature of creativity as manifest in its testing. In SternbergR. J. (Ed.), The nature of creativity (pp. 43–75). Cambridge University Press.
46.
WangA. Y. (2012). Exploring the relationship of creative thinking to reading and writing. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 7, 38–47.
47.
WeinerI. B.CraigheadW. E. (2010). Operational definition. In WeinerI. B.CraigheadW. E. (Eds.), The Corsini encyclopedia of psychology (Vol. 3, 4th ed., pp. 1128–1129). John Wiley and Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470479216
48.
WilliamsR. (1983). Keywords: A vocabulary of culture and society (Revised ed.). Oxford University Press.
ZhangY.Saari KitalongK. (2015). Influences on creativity in technical communication: Invention, motivation, and constraints. Technical Communication Quarterly, 24(3), 199–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2015.1043028
