Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2023-4
“The World Has to Stop Discriminating Against African American Language” (AAL): Exploring the Language Ideologies of AAL-Speaking Students in College Writing
Drawing on recent decades, literature in college writing that theorizes the importance of Critical Language Awareness (CLA) curricula for African American Language (AAL)-speaking students, this article offers empirical evidence on the design and implementation of a college writing curriculum centered on CLA and its influence on AAL–speaking students’ language ideologies with respect to both speech and writing. Qualitative analyses of students’ pre- and-post-Questionnaires and the researcher’s field notes demonstrate that the curriculum helped students view AAL as an independent, natural, and legitimate language and view themselves as critically conscious thinkers and writers—more likely and willing to develop their academic writing skills and the strategies that support employing their native language in writing—for example, code-meshing strategies. This study offers important implications for college writing instruction.
AlimH. S. (2010). Critical language awareness. In HornbergerN. H.McKayS. L. (Eds.), Sociolinguistics and language education (pp. 205-231). Multilingual Matters.
2.
AlimH. S.RickfordJ. R.BallA. F. (Eds.). (2016). Raciolinguistics: How language shapes our ideas about race. Oxford University Press.
3.
AlimH. S.SmithermanG. (2012). Articulate while Black: Barack Obama, language, and race in the US. Oxford University Press.
4.
Baker-BellA. (2013). “I never really knew the history behind African American language”: Critical language pedagogy in an advanced placement English language arts class. Equity & Excellence in Education, 46(3), 355-370.
5.
Baker-BellA. (2020). Linguistic justice: Black language, literacy, identity, and pedagogy. Routledge.
6.
BallA. F.LardnerT. (2005). African American literacies unleashed: Vernacular English and the composition classroom. SIU Press.
7.
BaughJ. (1983). Black street speech: Its history, structure, and survival. University of Texas Press.
8.
BaughJ. (1999). Out of the mouths of slaves: African American language and educational malpractice. University of Texas Press.
9.
BaughJ. (2000). Beyond Ebonics: Linguistic pride and racial prejudice. Oxford University Press.
10.
BaughJ. (2018). Linguistics in pursuit of justice. Cambridge University Press.
11.
BogdanR.BiklenS. K. (2003). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods (4th ed.). Allyn and Bacon.
12.
Charity HudleyA. H.MallinsonC. (2011). Understanding English language variation in US schools. Teachers College Press.
13.
Charity HudleyA. H.MallinsonC.Berry-McCreaE. L.MuwwakkilJ. (2020). Empowering African-American student voices in college. In KiblerA.ValdésG.WalquiA. (Eds.), Reconceptualizing the role of critical dialogue in American classrooms (pp. 157-184). Routledge.
14.
ClarkR.FaircloughN.IvanicR.Martin-JonesM. (1990). Critical language awareness Part 1: A critical review of three current approaches. Language and Education, 4(4), 249-60.
15.
ClarkR.FaircloughN.IvanicR.Martin-JonesM. (1991). Critical language awareness Part 2: Towards critical alternatives. Language and Education5(1), 41–54.
16.
ClarkR.IvaničR. (1997). The politics of writing. Routledge.
17.
Conference on College Composition and Communication. (1974). Students’ right to their own language. College Composition and Communication, 25(3), 1-32.
18.
De CostaP. I. (2020). Linguistic racism: Its negative effects and why we need to contest it. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 23(7), 833-837.
19.
de los RíosC. V. (2020). Writing oneself into the curriculum: Photovoice journaling in a secondary ethnic studies course. Written Communication, 37(4), 487-511.
20.
DeBoseC. E. (2005). The sociology of African American language: A language planning perspective. Palgrave Macmillan.
21.
Digital Archive of Literacy Narratives. (2010). The literacy narratives of Black Columbus. Race/Ethnicity: Multidisciplinary Global Contexts, 4(1), 133-157. https://doi.org/10.2979/racethmulglocon.2010.4.1.133
22.
DunstanS. B.JaegerA. J. (2015). Dialect and influences on the academic experiences of college students. The Journal of Higher Education, 86(5), 777-803.
23.
DysonA. H.GenishiC. (2005). On the case: Approaches to language and literacy research. Teachers College Press.
24.
FaircloughN. (Ed.). (1992). Critical language awareness. Longman.
25.
FaircloughN. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Routledge.
26.
FloresN.RosaJ. (2015). Undoing appropriateness: Raciolinguistic ideologies and language diversity in education. Harvard Educational Review, 85(2), 149-171.
27.
GalS. (1992). Multiplicity and contention among ideologies: A commentary. Pragmatics, 2(3), 445-449.
28.
GilyardK. (2011). True to the language game: African American discourse, cultural politics, and pedagogy. Routledge.
29.
GilyardK.RichardsonE. (2001). Students’ right to possibility: Basic writing and African American rhetoric. In GreenbaumA. (Ed.), Insurrections: Resistance in composition (pp. 37-51). State University of New York Press.
30.
GodleyA. J.MinniciA. (2008). Critical language pedagogy in an urban high school English class. Urban Education, 43(3), 319-346.
31.
GreenD. F. (2016). Expanding the dialogue on writing assessment at HBCUs: Foundational assessment concepts and legacies of historically Black colleges and universities. College English, 79(2), 152-173.
32.
GreenL. J. (2002). African American English: A linguistic introduction. Cambridge University Press.
33.
HankersonS. (2017). Black voices matter. Language Arts Journal of Michigan, 32(2), 34-39.
34.
HankersonS. (2020). “I love my African American language. And yours.”: Toward a raciolinguistic vision in writing studies. In ElliotN.HorningA. (Eds.), Talking back: Senior scholars deliberate the past, present, and future of writing studies. Utah State University Press.
35.
HankersonS. (2022). “Why can’t writing courses be taught like this fo real”: Leveraging critical language awareness to promote African American Language speakers’ writing skills. Journal of Second Language Writing, 58, 100919.
36.
hooksb. (2013). Writing beyond race: Living theory and practice. Routledge.
37.
InoueA. B. (2019). How do we language so people stop killing each other, or, what do we do about White language supremacy?College Composition and Communication, 71(2), 352-369.
38.
JohnsonD.VanBrackleL. (2012). Linguistic discrimination in writing assessment: How raters react to African American “errors,” ESL errors, and standard English errors on a state-mandated writing exam. Assessing Writing, 17(1), 35-54.
39.
KellsM. H. (2002). Linguistic contact zones in the college writing classroom: An examination of ethnolinguistic identity and language attitudes. Written Communication, 19(1), 5-43.
40.
KinlochV. (2010). “To not be a traitor of Black English”: Youth perceptions of language rights in an urban context. Teachers College Record, 112(1), 103-141.
41.
KirklandD.JacksonA. (2009). Beyond the silence: Instructional approaches and students’ attitudes. In ScottJ. C.StrakerD. Y.KatzL. (Eds.), Affirming students’ right to their own language: Bridging language policies and pedagogical practices (pp. 132-150). National Council of Teachers of English.
42.
KroskrityP. V. (2010). Language ideologies—Evolving perspectives. Society and language Use, 7(3), 192-205.
43.
KroskrityP. V. (2020). Theorizing linguistic racisms from a language ideological perspective. In AlimH. S.ReyesA.KroskrityP. V. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of language and race (pp. 68-88). Oxford University Press.
44.
KynardC. (2008). Writing while Black: The colour line, Black discourses and assessment in the institutionalization of writing instruction. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 7(2), 4-34.
45.
KynardC. (2013). Vernacular insurrections: Race, Black protest, and the new century in composition-literacies studies. State University of New York Press.
46.
LabovW. (1966). The effect of social mobility on linguistic behavior. Sociological Inquiry, 36(2), 186-203.
47.
LanehartS. (Ed.). (2015). The Oxford handbook of African American language. Oxford University Press.
48.
LanehartS. L. (1998). African American vernacular English and education: The dynamics of pedagogy, ideology, and identity. Journal of English linguistics, 26(2), 122-136.
49.
Lippi-GreenR. (2012). English with an accent: Language, ideology and discrimination in the United States (2nd ed.). Routledge.
50.
MacSwanJ. (2020). Academic English as standard language ideology: A renewed research agenda for asset-based language education. Language Teaching Research, 24(1), 28-36.
51.
MartínezR. A. (2013). Reading the world in Spanglish: Hybrid language practices and ideological contestation in a sixth-grade English language arts classroom. Linguistics and Education, 24(3), 276-288.
52.
McIntoshJ. (2018). Listening versus Lingwashing: Promise, peril, and structural oblivion when white South Africans learn indigenous African languages. Signs and Society, 6(3), 475-503.
53.
MerriamS. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. Revised and expanded from “case study research in education.”Jossey-Bass Publishers.
54.
MerriamS.TisdellE. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
55.
MetzM. (2018). Exploring the complexity of high school students’ beliefs about language variation. Linguistics and Education, 45, 10-19.
56.
MilroyJ. (2001). Language ideologies and the consequences of standardization. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 5(4), 530-555.
57.
MorganM. (2002). Language, discourse and power in African American culture. Cambridge University Press.
58.
MorrellE. (2008). Critical literacy and urban youth: Pedagogies of access, dissent, and liberation. Routledge.
PalacasA. L. (2001). Liberating American Ebonics from Euro-English. College English, 63(3), 326-352.
61.
ParisD. (2011). “A friend who understand fully”: Notes on humanizing research in a multiethnic youth community. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 24(2), 137-149.
62.
ParisD.WinnM. T. (Eds.). (2014). Humanizing research: Decolonizing qualitative inquiry with youth and communities. SAGE.
63.
PattonM. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation method (4th ed.). SAGE.
64.
Perryman-ClarkS. M. (2013). Afrocentric teacher-research: Rethinking appropriateness and inclusion. Peter Lang.
65.
RichardsonE. B. (2003). African American literacies. Routledge.
RickfordJ. R.RickfordR. J. (2000). Spoken soul: The story of Black English. John Wiley & Sons.
68.
SiegelJ. (2006). Language ideologies and the education of speakers of marginalized language varieties: Adopting a critical awareness approach. Linguistics and Education, 17(2), 157-174.
69.
SmithermanG. (1972). English teacher, why you be doing the thangs you don’t do?The English Journal, 61(1), 59-65.
70.
SmithermanG. (1977). Talkin and testifyin: The language of Black America. Wayne State University Press.
71.
SmithermanG. (2000). Talkin that talk: Language, culture, and education in African America. Routledge.
72.
SmithermanG. (2002). Toward a national public policy on language. In DelpitL.DowdyJ. K. (Eds.), The skin that we speak: Thoughts on language and culture in the classroom (pp. 163-178). The New Press.
73.
SmithermanG. (2006). Word from the mother: Language and African Americans. Routledge.
74.
SmithermanG. (2020). Raciolinguistics and the “mis-education of the Negro”—and you too: Race, language, and the elder in “post-racial” America. In ElliotN.HorningA. S. (Eds.), Talking back: Senior scholars and their colleagues deliberate the past, present, and future of writing studies (pp. 312-321). Utah State University Press.
75.
SwannJ.DeumertA.LillisT.MesthrieR. (2004). A dictionary of sociolinguistics. Edinburgh University Press.
76.
TrimburJ. (2006). Linguistic memory and the politics of US English. College English, 68(6), 575-588.
77.
TankosićA.DovchinS. (2021). (C)overt linguistic racism: Eastern-European background immigrant women in the Australian workplace. Ethnicities. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/14687968211005104
78.
Van DijkT. (2003). Critical discourse analysis. In SchiffrinD.TannenD.HamiltonH. (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 352-371). Blackwell Publishing.
79.
WassinkA. B.CurzanA. (2004). Addressing ideologies around African American English. Journal of English Linguistics, 32(3), 171-185.
80.
WeldonT. L. (2021). Middle-class African American English. Cambridge University Press.
81.
WilliamsB. J. (2013). Students’ “write” to their own language: Teaching the African American verbal tradition as a rhetorically effective writing skills. Equity & Excellence in Education, 46(3), 411-429.
82.
WinnM. T.UbilesJ. R. (2011). Worthy witnessing: Collaborative research in urban classrooms. In BallA.TysonC. (Eds.), Studying diversity in teacher education (pp. 295-308). Rowman and Littlefield.
83.
WolframW.Schilling-EstesN. (2006). American English (2nd ed.). Blackwell Publishing.
84.
WoolardK. A. (2021). Language ideology. In StanlawJ. (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of linguistic anthropology (pp. 1-21). John Wiley & Sons.
85.
WoolardK. A.SchieffelinB. B. (1994). Language ideology. Annual Review of Anthropology, 23(1), 55-82.
