Social Actors “to Go”: An Analytical Toolkit to Explore Agency in Business Discourse and Communication

Abstract

We argue that language awareness and discourse analytical skills should be part of business communication curricula. To this end, we propose a three-step analytical model drawing on organizational and critical discourse studies, and approaches from systemic-functional linguistics, to explore agency and action in business communication. Focusing on language and discourse helps students to analyze texts more systematically, researchers to gain deeper insights into organizational discourse, and practitioners to reflect on communication processes and produce texts with more impact. We view discourse as central to organizational processes and render a specific approach accessible and easy to integrate into business communication curricula.

Keywords

social actor analysis agency critical language awareness discourse analysis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aggerholm

H. K.

Asmuß

Thomsen

(2012).The role of recontextualization in the multivocal, ambiguous process of strategizing.Journal of Management Inquiry,21,413-428.https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492611430852

Alessi

G. M.

Jacobs

(Eds.). (2016).The ins and outs of business and professional discourse research: Reflections on interacting with the workplace.Basingstoke, England:Palgrave Macmillan.

Amernic

Craig

(2006).CEO speak: The language of corporate leadership.Montreal, Quebec, Canada:McGill-Queen’s University Press.

Avon. (2017).Debbie Coffey. Retrieved fromhttps://about.avon.com/company/leadership-team/debbie-coffey

Avon. (2018a).About corporate responsibility. RetrievedOctober 8, 2018, fromhttp://www.avoncompany.com/corporate-responsibility/about-CR/Avon

Avon. (2018b).Avon values and principles. RetrievedOctober 8, 2018, fromhttp://www.avoncompany.com/aboutavon/history/values.html

Bargiela-Chiappini

Nickerson

Planken

B. C.

(2013).Business discourse(2nd ed.).Basingstoke, England:Palgrave Macmillan.

Billig

(2008).The language of critical discourse analysis: The case of nominalization.Discourse & Society,19,783-800.https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926508095894

Boje

D. M.

Oswick

Ford

J. D.

(2004).Language and organization: The doing of discourse.Academy of Management Review,29,571-577.https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2004.14497609

10.

Breeze

(2015).“Or so the government would have you believe”: Uses of “you” in Guardian editorials.Discourse, Context & Media,10,36-44.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2015.07.003

11.

Brewer

M. B.

Gardner

(1996).Who is this “We”? Levels of collective identity and self representations.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,71,83-93.https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.1.83

12.

Caporael

L. R.

Lukaszewski

M. P.

Culbertson

G. H.

(1983).Secondary baby talk: Judgments by institutionalized elderly and their caregivers.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,44,746-754.https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.44.4.746

13.

Cheney

(1983).The rhetoric of identification and the study of organizational communication.Quarterly Journal of Speech,69,143-158.https://doi.org/10.1080/00335638309383643

14.

Clifton

(2012).“Doing” trust in workplace interaction. In Măda

Săftoiu

(Eds.),Professional communication across languages and cultures(pp.107-134).Philadelphia, PA:Benjamins.

15.

Cohen

Musson

Tietze

(2005).Teaching communication to business and management students: A view from the United Kingdom.Management Communication Quarterly,19,279-287.https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318905278536

16.

Cooren

(2004).Textual agency: How texts do things in organizational settings.Organization,11,373-393.https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508404041998

17.

Cooren

(2008).Between semiotics and pragmatics: Opening language studies to textual agency.Journal of Pragmatics,40,1-16.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.11.018

18.

Cooren

(2010).Action and agency in dialogue: Passion, incarnation and ventriloquism.Amsterdam, Netherlands:Benjamins.

19.

Cooren

Vaara

Langley

Tsoukas

(2014).Language and communication at work: Discourse, narrativity, and organizing: Introducing the fourth volume of “Perspectives on Process Organization Studies.”In Cooren

Vaara

Langley

Tsoukas

(Eds.),Language and communication at work: Discourse, narrativity, and organizing(pp.1-16).Oxford, England:Oxford University Press.

20.

Cornelissen

J. P.

Durand

Fiss

P. C.

Lammers

J. C.

Vaara

(2015).Putting communication front and center in institutional theory and analysis.Academy of Management Review,40,10-27.https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2014.0381

21.

De Cillia

Reisigl

Wodak

. (1999).The discursive construction of national identities.Discourse & Society,10,149-173.https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926599010002002

22.

Dickey

(2017).The elements of bureaucratic style.Longreads. Retrieved fromhttps://longreads.com/2017/04/12/the-elements-of-bureaucratic-style/

23.

Eisenberg

E. M.

(1984).Ambiguity as strategy in organizational communication.Communication Monographs,51,227-242.https://doi.org/10.1080/03637758409390197

24.

Fairclough

(2008).The language of critical discourse analysis: Reply to Michael Billig.Discourse & Society,19,811-819.https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926508095896

25.

Fairclough

(2010).Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language(2nd ed.).London, England:Longman.

26.

Giddens

(1984).The nation-state and violence.Oxford, England:Polity Press.

27.

Grant

Hardy

Oswick

Putnam

L. L.

(Eds.). (2004).The Sage handbook of organizational discourse.London, England:Sage.

28.

Halliday

M. A. K.

Matthiessen

C. M. I. M

. (2004).An introduction to functional grammar(3rd ed.).London, England:Arnold.

29.

Halliday

M. A. K.

Matthiessen

C. M. I. M

. (2014).Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar(4th ed.).Abingdon, England:Routledge.

30.

Jaworska

Nanda

(2016).Doing well by talking good: A topic modelling-assisted discourse study of corporate social responsibility.Applied Linguistics,37,1-28.https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amw014

31.

Koester

(2006).Investigating workplace discourse.Abingdon, England:Routledge.

32.

Koller

(2011).“Hard-working, team-oriented individuals”: Constructing professional identities in corporate mission statements. In Angouri

Marra

(Eds.),Constructing identities at work(pp.103-126).Basingstoke, England:Palgrave Macmillan.

33.

Koller

(2012).How to analyse collective identity in discourse—Textual and contextual parameters.Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis Across Disciplines,5(2),19-38.

34.

Koller

(2014).Cognitive linguistics and ideology. In Littlemore

Taylor

J. R.

(Eds.),The Bloomsbury companion to cognitive linguistics(pp.234-252).London, England:Bloomsbury.

35.

Koschmann

M. A.

McDonald

(2015).Organizational rituals, communication, and the question of agency.Management Communication Quarterly,29,229-256.https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318915572386

36.

Kuo

C.-H.

(1999).The use of personal pronouns: Role relationships in scientific journal articles.English for Specific Purposes,18,121-138.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(97)00058-6

37.

Levin

L. A.

Behrens

S. J.

(2003).From swoosh to swoon: Linguistic analysis of Nike’s changing image.Business Communication Quarterly,66(3),52-65.

38.

Marra

(2013).English in the workplace. In Paltridge

Starfield

(Eds.),The handbook of English for specific purposes(pp.175-192).Chichester, England:Wiley-Blackwell.

39.

Martin

J. R.

(2008).Incongruent and proud: De-vilifying “nominalization.” Discourse & Society,19,801-810.https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926508095895

40.

Mautner

(2016).Discourse and management: Critical perspectives through the language lens.Basingstoke, England:Palgrave Macmillan.

41.

Miller

(2015).Organizational communication: Approaches and processes(7th ed.).Stamford, CT:Cengage Learning.

42.

Musson

Cohen

(1999).Understanding language processes: A neglected skill in the management curriculum.Management Learning,30,27-42.https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507699301003

43.

Pollach

(2005).Corporate self-presentation on the WWW: Strategies for enhancing usability, credibility and utility.Corporate Communications: An International Journal,10,285-301.https://doi.org/10.1108/13563280510630098

44.

Putnam

L. L.

Cooren

(2004).Alternative perspectives on the role of text and agency in constituting organizations.Organization,11,323-333.https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508404041995

45.

Putnam

L. L.

Fairhurst

G. T.

(2001).Discourse analysis in organizations: Issues and concerns. In Jablin

F. M.

Putnam

L. L.

(Eds.),The new handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research and methods(pp.78-136).London, England:Sage.

46.

Putnam

L. L.

Fairhurst

G. T.

(2015).Revisiting “organizations as discursive constructions”: 10 years later.Communication Theory,25,375-392.https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12074

47.

Reisigl

Wodak

(2015).The discourse-historical approach (DHA). In Wodak

Meyer

(Eds.),Methods of critical discourse studies(3rd ed., pp.23-61).London, England:Sage.

48.

Searle

J. R.

(1969).Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language.Cambridge, England:Cambridge University Press.

49.

Serrano

M. J.

Oliva

M. A. A.

(2013).Seguimos con la actualidad [We continue with the news] . . . The first-person pluralnosotros“we” across Spanish media genres.Discourse & Communication,7,409-433.https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481313494437

50.

The PAD Research Group. (2016).Not so “innocent” after all? Exploring corporate identity construction online.Discourse & Communication,10,291-313.https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481315623902

51.

Thompson

(2013).Introducing functional grammar(3rd ed.).Abingdon, England:Routledge.

52.

Thurlow

(2017).Critical discourse studies in/of applied contexts. In Flowerdew

Richardson

J. E.

(Eds.),The Routledge handbook of critical discourse studies(pp.328-342).Abingdon, England:Routledge.

53.

Tietze

Cohen

Musson

(2003).Understanding organizations through language.London, England:Sage.

54.

van de Mieroop

(2009).The unofficial goals of business speeches. In Ramallo

Lorenzo Suárez

A. M.

Rodríguez-Yáñez

X. P.

Cap

(Eds.),New approaches to discourse and business communication(pp.82-101).Basingstoke, England:Palgrave Macmillan.

55.

van Dijk

T. A

. (1998).Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach.London, England:Sage.

56.

van Dijk

T. A

. (2008).Critical discourse analysis and nominalization: Problem or pseudo-problem? Discourse & Society,19,821-828.https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926508095897

57.

van Leeuwen

. (1996).The representation of social actors. In Caldas-Coulthard

C. R.

Coulthard

(Eds.),Texts and practices: Readings in critical discourse analysis(pp.32-71).London, England:Routledge.

58.

van Leeuwen

. (2008).Discourse and practice: New tools for critical discourse analysis.Oxford, England:Oxford University Press.

59.

Verschueren

(1999).Understanding pragmatics.London, England:Arnold.

60.

Verschueren

(2012).Ideology in language use: Pragmatic guidelines for empirical research.Cambridge, England:Cambridge University Press.

61.

Weninger

Kan

K. H.-Y.

(2013).(Critical) language awareness in business communication.English for Specific Purposes,32,59-71.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2012.09.002

62.

Westwood

Linstead

(2001).Language/organization: Introduction. In Westwood

Linstead

(Eds.),The language of organization(pp.1-19).London, England:Sage.

63.

Williams

(1988).Language taught for meetings and language used in meetings: Is there anything in common? Applied Linguistics,9,45-58.https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/9.1.45

64.

Zhang

. (2017,April 10).United responds to crisis by calling the passenger “disruptive” and “belligerent.”Business Insider. Retrieved fromhttp://www.businessinsider.com/united-airlines-ceo-letter-employee-2017-4