Creating a Unique Transnational Place: Deterritorialized Discourse and the Blending of Time and Space in Online Social Media

Abstract

This study describes how members of a transnational social network of Mexican bilinguals living in Chicago manipulate their language on online social media to facilitate and maintain close connections across borders. Using a discourse-centered online ethnographic approach, I examine conversations posted on members’ Facebook walls and the contexts in which the discourses are formed. I argue that members of this transnational social network engage in the use of deterritorialized discourse to create chronotopes; that is, through discourse, members connect temporal and spatial relationships and form them into a single constructed context. These chronotopes help members recontextualize Facebook as a unique transnational social place that connects families and allows for the continuation of cultural practices that maintain their transnationalism. This study sheds light on the use of linguistic resources and modes of communication to examine how individuals construct imagined experiences within a real intimate community in the deterritorialized space of online social media.

Keywords

writing digital communication Facebook chronotopes identity multimodality transnational

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Agha

(2007). Recombinant selves in mass mediated spacetime. Language & Communication, 27(3), 320-335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2007.01.001

Anderson

(2006). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London, UK: Verso.

Androutsopoulos

(2008). Potentials and limitations of discourse-centred online ethnography. Language@Internet , 5(8). Retrieved from http://www.languageatinternet.org/articles/2008/1610

Androutsopoulos

(2010). Localising the global on the participatory web: Vernacular spectacles as local responses to global media flows. In Coupland

(Ed.), Handbook of language and globalization (pp. 203-231). Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.

Bakhtin

M. M.

(1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.

Berry

Hawisher

Selfe

(2012). Transnational literate lives in digital times. Logan: Utah State University Press.

Blommaert

Backus

(2011). Repertoires revisited: Knowing language in superdiversity. Working Papers in Urban Language & Literacies, 67, 1-26.

Blommaert

Collins

Slembrouck

(2005). Spaces of multilingualism. Language & Communication, 25(3), 197-216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2005.05.002

boyd

d. m.

(2008). Taken out of context: American teen sociality in networked publics (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of California, Berkeley.

10.

boyd

d. m.

(2010). Social network sites as networked publics: Affordances, dynamics, and implications. In Papacharissi

(Ed.), A networked self: Identity, community, and culture on social network sites (pp. 39-58). New York, NY: Routledge.

11.

Brenner

(2013, December 31). Pew Internet: Social networking (full detail). Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/Commentary/2012/March/Pew-Internet-Social-Networking-full-detail.aspx

12.

Burrell

Anderson

(2008). “I have great desires to look beyond my world”: Trajectories of information and communication technology use among Ghanaians living abroad. New Media & Society, 10(2), 203-224. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444807086472

13.

Christiansen

M. S.

(2015a). “A ondi queras”: Ranchero identity construction by U.S. born Mexicans on Facebook. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 19(5), 688-702. https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12155

14.

Christiansen

M. S.

(2015b). Mexicanness and Social Order in Digital Spaces Contention Among Members of a Multigenerational Transnational Network. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 37(1), 3-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739986314565974

15.

Christiansen

M. S.

(2016a). “¡Hable Bien M”ijo o Gringo o Mx!’: Language ideologies in the digital communication practices of transnational Mexican bilinguals. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2016.1181603

16.

Christiansen

M. S.

(2016b). Maintaining Transnationalism: The Role of Digital Communication among US-Born Mexicans. In García

J. O.

Tavira

N. B.

(Eds.), Continuidades y Cambios en las Migraciones de México a Estados Unidos (pp. 353-376). Toluca, Edomex: Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México.

17.

Cornelius

W. A.

(Ed.). (2009). Migration from the Mexican Mixteca: A transnational community in Oaxaca and California. La Jolla: University of California, San Diego, Center for Comparative Immigration Studies.

18.

Crystal

(2008). Txtng : The Gr8 Db8. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

19.

Davies

(2012). Facework on Facebook as a new literacy practice. Computers & Education, 59(1), 19-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.11.007

20.

Deleuze

Guattari

(1983). Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

21.

Duggan

Ellison

N. B.

Lampe

Lenhart

Madden

(2015, January 9). Social media update 2014. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/01/09/social-media-update-2014/

22.

Farr

(2006). Rancheros in Chicagoacán: Language and identity in a transnational community. Austin: University of Texas Press.

23.

Gallagher

J. R.

(2015). Five strategies Internet writers use to “continue the conversation.” Written Communication, 32(4), 396-425. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088315601006

24.

Glaser

B. G.

Strauss

A. L.

(1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.

25.

Greenwood

Perrin

Duggan

(2016, November 11). Social media update 2016. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2016/11/11/social-media-update-2016/

26.

Hutchby

(2001). Technologies, texts and affordances. Sociology, 35(2), 441-456. https://doi.org/10.1177/S0038038501000219

27.

Hymes

D. H.

(1974). An ethnographic perspective. New Literary History, 5, 187-201.

28.

INEGI—Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e Informática. (2015). Estadísticas a Propósito del Día Mundial del Internet (17 de Mayo). Datos Nacionales. Aguascalienties, Ags [Statistics on Internet World Day (May 17). National Data. Aguascalientes, Ags]. Mexico City: Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía. Retrieved from http://www.inegi.org.mx/saladeprensa/aproposito/2015/internet0.pdf

29.

Jacquemet

(2005). Transidiomatic practices: Language and power in the age of globalization. Language & Communication, 25(3), 257-277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2005.05.001

30.

Jenkins

(2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York, NY: New York University Press.

31.

Jewitt

Kress

G. R.

(2003). Multimodal literacy. New York, NY: Peter Lang.

32.

Johnstone

(2008). Discourse analysis. Malden, Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishing.

33.

Kress

(2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. New York, NY: Routledge.

34.

Lam

W. S. E.

(2009). Multiliteracies on instant messaging in negotiating local, translocal, and transnational affiliations: A case of an adolescent immigrant. Reading Research Quarterly, 44(4), 377-397.

35.

Lam

W. S. E.

(2014). Literacy and capital in immigrant youths’ online networks across countries. Learning, Media and Technology, 39(4), 488-506. https://doi.org/10.1080/174398842014.942665

36.

Lam

W. S. E.

Rosario-Ramos

(2009). Multilingual literacies in transnational digitally mediated contexts: An exploratory study of immigrant teens in the United States. Language and Education, 23(2), 171-190.

37.

Lam

W. S. E.

Warriner

D. S.

(2012). Transnationalism and literacy: Investigating the mobility of people, languages, texts, and practices in contexts of migration. Reading Research Quarterly, 47(2), 191-215. https://doi.org/10.1002/RRQ.016

38.

Levitt

(2001). The transnational villagers. Berkeley: University of California Press.

39.

Levitt

Waters

M. C.

(Eds.). (2006). The changing face of home: The transnational lives of the second generation. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.

40.

Louie

(2004). Compelled to excel: Immigration, education, and opportunity among Chinese Americans. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

41.

Madianou

Miller

(2012). Migration and new media: Transnational families and polymedia. New York, NY: Routledge.

42.

Milroy

(2002). Social networks. In Chambers

J. K.

Trudgill

Schilling-Estes

(Eds.), The handbook of language variation and change (pp. 549-572). New York, NY: Blackwell. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9780470756591.ch22/summary

43.

Otsuji

Pennycook

(2010). Metrolingualism: Fixity, fluidity and language in flux. International Journal of Multilingualism, 7(3), 240-254. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790710903414331

44.

Rumbaut

R. G.

Komaie

(2010). Immigration and adult transitions. Future of Children, 20(1), 43-66. https://doi.org/10.2307/27795059

45.

Rymes

(2014). Communicating beyond language: Everyday encounters with diversity. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.

46.

Saville-Troike

(2003). The Ethnography of Communication: An Introduction (3rd ed.). Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub.

47.

Schiller

N. G.

Basch

L. G.

Blanc

C. S.

(1992). Towards a transnational perspective on migration: Race, class, ethnicity, and nationalism reconsidered. New York, NY: New York Academy of Sciences.

48.

Smith

R. C.

(2006). Mexican New York: Transnational lives of new immigrants. Berkeley: University of California Press.

49.

Tannen

Trester

A. M.

(Eds.). (2013). Discourse 2.0: Language and new media. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

50.

Tarsa

(2015). Emerging voices: Upvoting the exordium: Literacy practices of the digital interface. College English, 78(1), 12-33.

51.

Vieira

(2011). Undocumented in a documentary society textual borders and transnational religious literacies. Written Communication, 28(4), 436-461. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088311421468

52.

Vieira

(2016). Writing remittances: Migration-driven literacy learning in a Brazilian homeland. Research in the Teaching of English, 50(4), 422-449.

53.

Waldinger

R. D.

(2015). The cross-border connection: Immigrants, emigrants, and their homelands. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

54.

(2009). Adolescent literacy and identity construction among 1.5 generation students: From a transnational perspective. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 19(1), 100-129. https://doi.org/10.1075/japc.19.1.06yi