This article examines students’ literacy practices during Mass and other Catholic religious services in a multilingual, multiethnic urban Catholic school in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. It discusses three dimensions of their literacy practice: (a) how parents, teachers, and priests draw on the tradition of Catholic schooling and ritual to structure what constitutes literacy during Mass; (b) how students use body posture and performative orientations to the text of the liturgy to engage in these structured practices; and (c) how students strategically use these performative literacy practices for advantage and social positioning. These results invite complicating what literacy practices are valued in contemporary urban Catholic school and how opportunities to draw on these literacy practices are unequally distributed among students for unequal gain.
BakerJ. (1993). The presence of the name: Reading scripture in Indonesia. In BoyarinJ. (Ed.), The ethnography of reading (pp. 98-138). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
2.
BakhtinM. (1981). The dialogic imagination. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
3.
BaumanR. (1996). Transformation of the word in the production of Mexican festival drama. In SilversteinM.UrbanG. (Eds.), The natural history of discourse (pp. 302-328). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
4.
BlommaertJ. (2009). Ethnography and democracy: Hymes’s political theory of language. Talk & Text, 29(3), 257-276.
5.
BlommaertJ. (2010). The sociolinguistics of globalization. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
6.
BloomeD.Egan-RobertsonA. (1993). The social construction of intertextuality in classroom reading and writing lessons. Reading Research Quarterly, 28(4), 304-333.
7.
BourdieuP. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
8.
BourdieuP. (1990). In other words: Essays towards a reflexive sociology. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
9.
BourdieuP. (1996). The state nobility: Elite schools in the field of power (CloughL. C., Trans.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
10.
BourdieuP. (2000). Pascalian meditations. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
11.
BourdieuP.WacquantL. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
12.
BrinigM. F.GarnettN. S. (2014). Lost classroom, lost community: Catholic schools’ importance in urban America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
13.
BrykA. S. (1996). Lessons from Catholic high schools on renewing our educational institutions. In McLaughlinT. H.O’KeefeJ.O’KeefeB. (Eds.), The contemporary Catholic school: Context, identity, and diversity (pp. 25-41). Washington, DC: Falmer Press.
14.
CampanoG.GhisoM. P.SánchezL. (2013). “Nobody one knows the . . .amount of a person”: Elementary students critiquing dehumanization through organic critical literacies. Research in the Teaching of English, 48(1), 97-124.
15.
CampanoG.GhisoM. P.YeeM.PantojaA. (2013). Community research and literacy practices for educational justice. Language Arts, 90(5), 314-326.
16.
CastanheiraM. L.CrawfordT.DixonC. N.GreenJ. L. (2001). Interactional ethnography: An approach to studying the social construction of literate practices. Linguistics and Education, 11(4), 353-400.
17.
ColemanJ.HofferT.KilgoreS. B. (1982). High school achievement: Public, Catholic, and private schools compared. New York, NY: Basic Books.
18.
Du BoisJ. (1986). Self-evidence and ritual speech. In ChafeW.NicholsJ. (Eds.), Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology (pp. 313-417). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
19.
DysonA. H.GenishiC. (2005). On the case. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
20.
EakleA. J. (2007). Literacy spaces of a Christian faith-based school. Reading Research Quarterly, 42(4), 472-520.
21.
EbaughH.ChafetzJ. (2000). Religion and the new immigrants: Continuities and adaptation in immigrant congregations. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira.
22.
EisensteinE. (1980). The printing press as an agent of change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
23.
EricksonF. (2004). Demystifying data construction and analysis. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 35(4), 486-493.
24.
FarrM. (2000). Literacy and religion: Reading, writing, and gender among Mexican women in Chicago. In GriffinP.PeytonJ. K.WolframW.FasoldR. (Eds.), Language in action: New studies of language in society (pp. 139-154). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
25.
FishmanJ. (2006). A decalogue of basic theoretical perspectives for a sociology of language and religion. In OmoniyiT.FishmanJ. (Eds.), Explorations in the sociology of language and religion (pp. 13-25). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
26.
FoleyD. (2010). The rise of class culture theory in educational anthropology. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 41(3), 215-227.
27.
GoffmanE. (1981). Forms of talk. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
28.
GonzalezD. (2013, June20). A lifeline for minorities, Catholic schools retrench. New York Times, p. A16.
29.
GoodeJ.SchneiderJ. (1994). Reshaping ethnic and racial relations in Philadelphia: Immigrants in a divided city. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
30.
GreenJ.WallatC. (1981). Mapping instructional conversations. In GreenJ.WallatC. (Eds.), Ethnography and language in educational contexts (pp. 162-195). Norwood, MA: Ablex.
31.
GrenfellM. (1998). Language and the classroom. In GrenfellM.JamesD. (Eds.), Bourdieu and education: Acts of practical theory (pp. 72-88). London, UK: Falmer Press.
32.
GutierrezK.RymesB.LarsonJ. (1995). Script, counterscript, and underlife in the classroom: James Brown versus Brown v. Board of Education. Harvard Educational Review, 65(3), 445-472.
33.
HaasC.WitteS. (2001). Writing as embodied practice: The case of engineering standards. Journal of Business and Technical Communications15(4), 413-457.
34.
HannonJ. T. (1984). The influence of Catholic schools on the desegregation of public school systems. Population Research and Policy Review, 3(3), 219-237.
35.
HeathS. B. (1983). Ways with words. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
36.
HeathS. B.StreetB. V. (2008). On ethnography. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
37.
HollandD.LachicotteW.SkinnerD.CainC. (2001). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
38.
HuntT. C.WalchT. (Eds.). (2010). Urban Catholic education: Tales of twelve American cities. Notre Dame, IN: Alliance for Catholic Education Press at the University of Notre Dame.
39.
HymesD. (1996). Ethnography, linguistics, narrative inequality: Toward an understanding of voice. London, UK: Taylor & Francis.
40.
JuzwikM.McKenzieC. (2015). Writing, religious faith, and rooted cosmopolitanism: Portraits of two American evangelical men in a public school English classroom. Written Communication, 32(2), 121-149.
41.
KapitzkeC. (1995). Literacy and religion: The textual politics and practice of Seventh-Day Adventism. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
42.
KatzM.ParkD.SingerA.VitielloD. (2008). Recent immigration to Philadelphia. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.
43.
KellyS. (2010). The prevalence of developmental instruction in public and Catholic schools. Teachers College Record, 112(9), 2405-2440.
44.
KroonS. (2013). Catechistic teaching, national canons, and the regimentation of student voice. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 44(2), 189-201.
45.
LevinsonB.FoleyD.HollandD. (1996). The cultural production of the educated person. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
46.
LillisT. (2008). Ethnography as method, methodology, and “deep theorizing”: Closing the gap between text and context in academic writing research. Written Communication, 25(3), 353-388.
47.
LouieV.HoldawayJ. (2009). Catholic schools and immigrant students: A new generation. Teachers College Record, 111(3), 783-816.
48.
LukeA. (1992). The body literate: Discourse and inscription in early literacy training. Linguistics and Education, 4(1), 107-129.
49.
LukeA.FreebodyP. (1997). Shaping the social practices of reading. In MusprattS.LukeA.FreebodyP. (Eds.), Constructing critical literacies (pp. 185-225). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
50.
MacGregorC. A. (2012). School’s out forever: The decline of Catholic education in the United States (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.
51.
MattinglyC. (2014). Beyond the Protestant literacy myth. In DuffyJ.ChristophJ. N.GoldblattE.GraffN.NowacekR. S.TraboldB. (Eds.), Literacy, economy, and power (pp. 45-60). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
52.
MehanH. (1979). Learning lessons. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
53.
MooreL. C. (2008). Body, text, and talk in Maroua Fulbe Qur’anic schooling. Text & Talk, 28(5), 643-665.
54.
MooreL. (2010). Learning in schools. In LancyD. F.BockJ.GaskingsS. (Eds.), Anthropology of learning in childhood (pp. 207-234). Plymouth, NH: AltaMira.
55.
MooreR. (2013). “Taking up speech” in an endangered language: Bilingual discourse in a heritage language classroom. Working Papers in Urban Language & Literacies, 112, 1-21.
56.
MoraG. C. (2013). Religion and the organizational context of immigrant civic engagement: Mexican Catholicism in the USA. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 36(11), 1647-1665.
57.
National Catholic Educational Association. (2014). US Catholic elementary and secondary schools, 2013-2014: Annual statistical report on schools, enrolment, and staffing. Arlington, VA: Author.
58.
OrellanaM. F. (2009). Translating childhoods: Immigration, youth, language, and culture. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
59.
RamptonB. (2006). Language in late modernity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
60.
RamptonB.MaybinJ.RobertsC. (2014). Methodological foundations in linguistic ethnography (Working Papers in Urban Language & Literacies 125). London, UK: King’s College London.
61.
RatzingerJ. (2000). The spirit of the liturgy. San Francisco, CA: Ignatius Press.
62.
RosowksyA. (2012). Performance and flow: The religious classical in translocal and transnational linguistic repertoires. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 16(5), 613-637.
63.
RosowskyA. (2013). Religious classical practice: Entextualization and performance. Language in Society, 42(3), 307-330.
SkerrettA. (2014). Religious literacies in a secular literacy classroom. Reading Research Quarterly, 49(2), 433-250.
66.
SterponiL. (2007). Clandestine interactional reading: Intertextual and double-voicing under the desk. Linguistics and Education, 18(1), 1-23.
67.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
68.
StreetB. V. (1985). Literacy in theory and in practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
69.
TakenakaA.OsirimM. J. (2010). Global Philadelphia: Immigrant communities, old and new. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
70.
U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops. (2013). Best practices for shared parishes. Washington, DC: Author.
71.
Van AllenR. (2013). Toward sustainable Catholic education: Parochial schools in Philadelphia. In HuntT. C.O’BrienD. J.WalchT. (Eds.), Urban Catholic education: The best of times, the worst of times (pp. 31-49). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
72.
VieiraK. E. (2011). Undocumented in a documentary society: Textual borders and transnational religious literacies. Written Communication, 28(4), 436-461.
73.
WagnerD. (1993). Literacy, culture, and development: Becoming literate in Morocco. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
74.
WorthamS. (2006). Learning and identity: The joint emergence of social identification and academic learning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
