Delineating a nuanced distinction between high-pressure and high-stakes scenarios, this study introduces the Measure of Interpersonal Apprehensions in High-Stakes Situations (MIPHSS), a sophisticated assessment instrument designed to comprehensively evaluate the direct, and mediating, effects of interpersonal apprehension (IpA) on the behavior (BA) and performance apprehension (PA) of professionals operating in high-stakes contexts. Additionally, the study explores the moderating effects of gender and behavioral and communication training (B&CT ) on these relationships. The hypotheses were empirically tested using SmartPLS-3, employing a sample of 210 professionals operating within high-stakes environments. The findings show a direct positive impact of interpersonal apprehension on both behavioral and performance apprehension, with behavioral apprehension identified as a mediating factor in the relationship between interpersonal and performance apprehension. Notably, the moderating effect of gender was statistically insignificant. Conversely, B&CT exhibited a moderately significant impact on mitigating performance apprehension in professions characterized by heightened stakes.
Afshar JahanshahiA.RivasM. I.CastilloA. Y. (2022). The outcomes of organizational fairness among precarious workers: The critical role of anomie at the work. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2022, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1288273
2.
AgarwalR.KarahannaE. (2000). Time flies when you’re having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quarterly, 24(4), 665. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250951
3.
AgrawalS.KrishnaS. M. (2021). Communication apprehension and psychological well-being of students in online learning. Behavioral Sciences, 11(11), 145. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs11110145
4.
AripinN.NoorezamM.RahmatN. H. (2020). Kinesics in oral presentation: Exploring speaking anxiety through narrative enquiry. European Journal of English Language Teaching, 6(2), 1-14https://doi.org/10.46827/ejel.v6i2.3467
5.
AutmanH.KellyS.GaytanJ.HunterS. (2016). Measuring High School Students’ Communication Readiness: Does Communication Apprehension, Writing Ability, and Speaking Ability Correlate With Students’ Perceptions of Professional Appearance? The journal of research in business education, 57(2), 42-56.
6.
AzmiM. N.ShamR. M. (2018). Causal relationship between school-based oral performance with communication apprehension, test anxiety and fear of negative evaluation. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(3), 15-34. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v8-i3/3896
7.
BarileS.CiasulloM. V.TestaM.La SalaA. (2023). An integrated learning framework of corporate training system: A grounded theory approach. The TQM Journal, 35(5), 1106-1134. https://doi.org/10.1108/tqm-03-2022-0090
8.
BarnettM. D.MacielI. V.JohnsonD. M.CiepluchI. (2020). Social anxiety and perceived social support: Gender differences and the mediating role of communication styles. Psychological Reports, 124(1), 70-87. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294119900975
9.
BarrettA.MurphyM.BlackburnK. (2017). “Playing hooky” health messages: Apprehension, impression management, and deception. Health Communication, 33(3), 326-337. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2016.1266578
10.
BeattyM. J.McCroskeyJ. C.HeiselA. D. (1998). Communication apprehension as temperamental expression: A Communibiological paradigm. Communication Monographs, 65(3), 197-219. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759809376448
11.
BlumeB. D.BaldwinT. T.RyanK. C. (2013). Communication apprehension: A barrier to students’ leadership, adaptability, and multicultural appreciation. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 12(2), 158-172. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2011.0127
12.
BourhisJ.AllenM. T.BaumanI. (2006). Communication apprehension: Issues to consider in the classroom. In GayleB. M.PreissR. W.BurrellN.AllenM. (Eds.), Classroom communication and instructional processes: Advances through meta-analysis (pp. 211-227). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
13.
Briones PeñalverA. J.Bernal ConesaJ. A.De Nieves NietoC. (2017). Analysis of corporate social responsibility in Spanish agribusiness and its influence on innovation and performance. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(2), 182-193. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1448
14.
BrookC. A.WilloughbyT. (2017). Shyness and social anxiety assessed through self-report: What are we measuring?Journal of Personality Assessment, 101(1), 54-63. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2017.1388808
15.
CaoM.DrasgowF. (2019). Does forcing reduce faking? A meta-analytic review of forced-choice personality measures in high-stakes situations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 104(11), 1347-1368. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000414
16.
CardonP.OkoroE. A.PriestR.PattonG. (2022). Communication apprehension in the workplace: Focusing on inclusion. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 86(1), 52-75. https://doi.org/10.1177/23294906221129599
17.
ChenY.ChenS. (2021). Looking at both sides of high-performance work systems and individual performance: A job demands−resources model. Journal of Management & Organization, 29(5), 872-892. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2021.4
18.
CroucherS. M.KellyS.RahmaniD.BurkeyM.SubanalievT.Galy-BadenasF.LandoA. L.ChibitaM.NyiransabimanaV.TurdubaevaE.EskiçorapçıN.JacksonK. (2019). A multi-national validity analysis of the self-perceived communication competence scale. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 13(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/17513057.2019.1569250
19.
DuffD. C.LevineT. R.BeattyM. J.WoolbrightJ.Sun ParkH. (2007). Testing public anxiety treatments against a credible placebo control. Communication Education, 56(1), 72-88. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520601016186
20.
FalkR. F.MillerN. B. (1992). A primer for soft modeling. University of Akron Press.
21.
FeeneyJ. R.McCarthyJ. M.GoffinR. (2015). Applicant anxiety: Examining the sex-linked anxiety coping theory in job interview contexts. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 23(3), 295-305. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.12115
22.
FeilerA. R.PowellD. M. (2013). Interview anxiety across the sexes: Support for the sex-linked anxiety coping theory. Personality and Individual Differences, 54(1), 12-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.07.030
GuestG.NameyE.TaylorJ.EleyN.McKennaK. (2017). Comparing focus groups and individual interviews: Findings from a randomized study. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 20(6), 693-708. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2017.1281601
25.
HennesJ. (2022). Communicating in risk, crisis, and high stress situations: Evidence-based strategies and practice: Vincent T. Covello: [Book review]. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 65(2), 351-352. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpc.2022.3167290
26.
HirschP. B. (2022). The serpent under it: Cognitive bias in ethics and compliance training. Journal of Business Strategy, 43(6), 406-409. https://doi.org/10.1108/jbs-08-2022-0145
27.
IrelandC. (2020). Apprehension felt towards delivering oral presentations: A case study of accountancy students. Accounting Education, 29(3), 305-320. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2020.1737548
28.
Jones-CarmackJ. (2022). Increasing employee motivation to lead through an understanding of communication apprehension. International Journal of Business Communication, 232948842211218. https://doi.org/10.1177/23294884221121821
29.
KennedyB. L.SchwabJ. J.MorrisR. L.BeldiaG. (2004). Assessment of state and trait anxiety in subjects with anxiety and depressive disorders. Psychiatric Quarterly, 72, 263-276.
30.
KuglerA.KuglerM.SaavedraJ. E.Herrera-PradaL. O. (2020). Long-term educational consequences of vocational training in Colombia. Journal of Human Resources, 57(1), 178-216. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.57.1.0518-9528r2
31.
LatifK. F. (2017). The development and validation of stakeholder-based scale for measuring University social responsibility (USR). Social Indicators Research, 140(2), 511-547. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1794-y
32.
LloydK.PenningtonW. (2020). Towards a theory of minimalism and wellbeing. International Journal of Applied Positive Psychology, 5(3), 121-136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41042-020-00030-y
McCarthyJ. M.TruxilloD. M.BauerT. N.ErdoganB.ShaoY.WangM.LiffJ.GardnerC. (2021). Distressed and distracted by COVID-19 during high-stakes virtual interviews: The role of job interview anxiety on performance and reactions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 106(8), 1103-1117. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000943
36.
McCroskeyJ. C. (1972). The implementation of a large-scale program of systematic desensitization for communication apprehension. The Speech Teacher, 21(4), 255-264. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634527209377961
PowellD. M.BourdageJ. S.BonaccioS. (2020). Shake and fake: The role of interview anxiety in deceptive impression management. Journal of Business and Psychology, 36(5), 829-840. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-020-09708-1
39.
SauerP. L.DickA. (1993). Using moderator variables in structural equation models. Advances in consumer research, 20(1), 637.
40.
SchneiderL.PowellD. M.BonaccioS. (2019). Does interview anxiety predict job performance and does it influence the predictive validity of interviews?International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 27(4), 328-336. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.12263
41.
ShrivastavaA. (2020). Are millennials communication deficient? Solving a generational puzzle in an Indian context. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 63(3), 259-271. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpc.2020.3009713
42.
ShrivastavaA.KabraS.KapoorM. (2023). Reappraising the relationship between interview anxiety and performance outcome in a computer-mediated setting. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 87(2), 300-323. https://doi.org/10.1177/23294906231160672
43.
Simcic BrønnP. (2014). How others see us: Leaders’ perceptions of communication and communication managers. Journal of Communication Management, 18(1), 58-79. https://doi.org/10.1108/jcom-03-2013-0028
44.
SimpsonH. B.NeriaY.Lewis-FernándezR.SchneierF. (2010). Anxiety disorders: Theory, research and clinical perspectives. Cambridge University Press.
45.
SosnowskiM. J.BrosnanS. F. (2023). Under pressure: The interaction between high-stakes contexts and individual differences in decision-making in humans and non-human species. Animal Cognition, 26(4), 1103-1117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-023-01768-z
46.
SpenceP. R.Sellnow-RichmondD. D.SellnowT. L.LachlanK. A. (2016). Social media and corporate reputation during crises: The viability of video-sharing websites for providing counter-messages to traditional broadcast news. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 44(3), 199-215. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2016.1192289
47.
SpielbergerC. D.GorsuchR. L.LusheneR.VaggP. R.JacobsG. A. (2003). State–Trait Anxiety Inventory Self Evaluation Questionnaire, Form Y (STAI). The British Psychological Society. https://doi.org/10.53841/bpstest.2003.stai
48.
SyedF.NaseerS.AkhtarM. W.HusnainM.KashifM. (2021). Frogs in boiling water: A moderated-mediation model of exploitative leadership, fear of negative evaluation and knowledge hiding behaviors. Journal of Knowledge Management, 25(8), 2067-2087. https://doi.org/10.1108/jkm-11-2019-0611
49.
UraonR. S.ChauhanA.BharatiR.SahuK. (2023). Do Agile work practices impact team performance through project commitment? Evidence from the information technology industry. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 73(4), 1212-1234. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijppm-03-2023-0114
50.
Van der MolenM. J.PoppelaarsE. S.Van HartingsveldtC. T.HarrewijnA.Gunther MoorB.WestenbergP. M. (2014). Fear of negative evaluation modulates electrocortical and behavioral responses when anticipating social evaluative feedback. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7(936), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00936
WongE. L.CoulterA.CheungA. W.YamC. H.YeohE.GriffithsS. (2013). Item generation in the development of an inpatient experience questionnaire: A qualitative study. BMC Health Services Research, 13(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-265
53.
YaffeY. (2021). Students’ recollections of parenting styles and impostor phenomenon: The mediating role of social anxiety. Personality and Individual Differences, 172, 110598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110598
54.
ZhangI. Y.PowellD. M.BonaccioS. (2021). The role of fear of negative evaluation in interview anxiety and social-evaluative workplace anxiety. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 30(2), 302-310. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.12365
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
