This article tracks the socialization of a Chinese intern into a Hong Kong PR company and considers the factors that enabled her to move toward acquiring the discourse of the profession. Taking a case study approach, the research is based on a detailed daily journal written by the intern during her internship, and two interviews. Over the 3-month period of the internship, her written discourse changed considerably, revealing the extent of her socialization into the organization. Specifically, the intern’s writing changed from detailed general descriptions of her activity to discourse resembling that of PR practitioners. The study demonstrates the power of the workplace as a context for learning, yet data show that the academy, by providing tools for understanding and reflecting on organizational culture, also has a role to play in socialization processes.
AnsonC.ForsbergL. (1990). Moving beyond the academic community: Transitional stages in professional writing. Written Communication, 7(2), 200-231.
2.
ArtemevaN. (2005). A time to speak, a time to act: A rhetorical genre analysis of a novice engineer’s calculated risk taking. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 19, 389-421.
3.
ArtemevaN. (2009). Stories of becoming: A study of novice engineers learning genres of their profession. In BazermanC.BoniniA.FiguieredoD. (Eds.), Genre in a changing world: Perspectives on writing (pp. 158-178). Fort Collins, CO: The WAC Clearinghouse and Parlor Press.
4.
BartonD.HamiltonM. (1998). Local literacies: Reading and writing in one community. London, UK: Routledge.
BeaufortA. (1999). Writing in the real world: Making the transition from school to work. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
7.
BeaufortA. (2008). Writing in the professions. In BazermanC. (Ed.), Handbook of research on writing: History, society, school, individual, text (pp. 221-235). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8.
BerkenkotterC. (2001). Genre systems at work: DSM-IV and rhetorical recontextualization in psychotherapy paperwork. Written Communication, 18, 326-349.
9.
BerkenkotterC.HuckinT. (1995). Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication: Cognition/culture/power. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10.
BlylerN.ThrallsC. (Eds.). (1993). Professional communication: The social perspective. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
11.
DiasP.FreedmanA.MedwayP.ParéA. (1999). Worlds apart: Acting and writing in academic contexts. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12.
DiasP.ParéA. (Eds.). (2000). Transitions: Writing in academic and workplace settings. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
13.
DuffP. (2008). Language socialization, higher education and work. In DuffP.HornburgerN. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education (Vol. 8, pp. 257-270). New York, NY: Springer.
14.
EngeströmY. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki, Finland: Orienta-Konsultit Oy.
15.
FreedmanA.AdamC. (1996). Learning to write professionally: Situated learning and the transition from university to professional discourse. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 10, 395-427.
16.
FreedmanA.AdamC. (2000). Bridging the gap: University-based writing that is more than simulation. In DiasP.ParéA. (Eds.), Transitions: Writing in academic and workplace settings (pp. 129-144). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
17.
FreedmanA.AdamC.SmartG. (1994). Wearing suits to class: Simulating genres and simulations as genre. Written Communication, 11(2), 193-226.
18.
FreedmanA.MedwayP. (Eds.). (1994). Genre and the new rhetoric. London, UK: Taylor and Francis.
19.
GaltensJ. (2000). Lessons from the field: Socialization issues in writing and editing internships. Business Communication Quarterly, 63(1), 64-76.
20.
GoodwinC.DurantiA. (1992). Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Le MaistreC.ParéA. (2004). Learning in two communities: The challenge for universities and workplaces. Journal of Workplace Learning, 16(1/2), 44-52.
23.
LiD. (2000). The pragmatics of making requests in the L2 workplace: A case study of language socialization. Canadian Modern Language Review, 57(1), 58-87.
24.
MawerG. (1999). Language and literacy in workplace education. London, UK: Longman.
MillerV.JablinF. (1991). Information seeking during organizational entry: Influences, tactics, and a model of the process. Academy of Management Review, 16, 92-120.
27.
OchsE. (1993). Constructing social identity: A language socialization perspective. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 26, 287-306.
28.
OdellL.GoswamiS. (Eds.). (1985). Writing in nonacademic settings. New York, NY: Guilford.
29.
ParéA. (2000) Writing as a way into social work: Genre sets, genre systems, and distributed cognition. In DiasP.ParéA. (Eds.), Transitions: Writing in academic and workplace settings (pp. 145-166). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
30.
ParksS. (2001). Moving from school to the workplace: Disciplinary innovation, border crossings, and the reshaping of a written genre. Applied Linguistics, 22, 405-438.
31.
RobertsC. (2010). Language socialization in the workplace. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 30, 211-227.
32.
RogoffB. (1991). Social interaction as apprenticeship in thinking: Guided participation in spatial planning. In ResnickL.LevineJ.TeasleyS. (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 349-364). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
33.
RussellD. (1997). Rethinking genre in school and society: An activity theory analysis. Written Communication, 14, 504-554.
34.
SchneiderB.AndreJ. (2005). University preparation for workplace writing: An exploratory study of the perceptions of students in three disciplines. Journal of Business Communication, 42(2), 195-218.
35.
SchönD. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York, NY: Basic Books.
36.
SmartG. (2006). Writing the economy: Activity, genre and technology in the world of banking. London, UK: Equinox.
37.
SmartG.BrownN. (2006). Developing a “discursive gaze”: Participatory action research with student interns encountering new genres in the activity of the workplace. In ArtemevaN.FreedmanA. (Eds.), Rhetorical studies and beyond (pp. 241-282). Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada: Inkshed.
38.
VickersC. (2007). Second language socialization through team interaction among electrical and computer engineering students. Modern Language Journal, 91, 621-640.
39.
VygotskyL. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
40.
WengerE. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
41.
WinsorD. (1996). Writing like an engineer: A rhetorical education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
