This article reports on the types of scientific writing found in two primary grade classrooms. These results are part of a larger two-year study whose purpose was to examine the development of informational writing of second- and third-grade students as they participated in integrated science-literacy instruction. The primary purpose of the present article is to report on the “genre set” (Bazerman, 2004) established in this community around science instruction. Using Halliday’s (1993) Systemic Functional Linguistics approach and Hasan’s (1985, 1994) Generic Structure Potential, I describe the genres of scientific writing and drawing activities in which these children regularly participated. Findings indicate that children participated in several distinct scientific genres, some of which were flexible, and some of which were highly constrained by the teachers. Each of the genres represented a distinct purpose, structure, and linguistic nature of scientific discourse. The influence of this particular genre set on children’s appropriation of scientific discourse is discussed.
Applebee, A.N. ( 1996). Curriculum as conversation: Transforming traditions of teaching and learning. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
2.
Bazerman, C. ( 1997). The life of genre, the life in the classroom. In W. Bishop & H. Ostrom (Eds.), Genres and writing: Issues, arguments, alternatives (pp. 19-26). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
3.
Bazerman, C. ( 2004). Speech acts, genres, and activity systems: How texts organize activity and people. In C. Bazerman & P. Prior (Eds.), What writing does and how it does it: An introduction to analyzing texts and textual practices (pp. 309339). Mahwah, NJU: Lawrence Erlbaum
4.
Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S. ( 1998). Qualitative research in education. New York: Allyn & Bacon.
5.
Christie, Frances ( 1989). Language development in education. In R. Hasan & J. R. Martin (Eds.), Language development: Learning language, learning culture ( Vol. XXVII, pp. 152-256). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
6.
Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. ( 1993). Introduction: How a genre approach to literacy can transform the way writing is taught. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), The powers of literacy: A genre approach to teaching writing (pp. 1-21). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
7.
Cazden, Courtney B. ( 1988, 2001). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
8.
Donovan, C.A. ( 2001). Children’s development and control of written story and informational genres: Insights from one elementary school. Research in the Teaching of English, 35, 394-447.
9.
Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. ( 1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23, 5-12.
10.
Duke, N.K. ( 2000). 3.6 minutes per day: The scarcity of informational texts in first grade. Reading Research Quarterly, 35, 202-224.
11.
Dyson, A.H. ( 1995). Writing children: Reinventing the development of childhood literacy. Written Communication, 12, 4-46.
12.
Dyson, A.H. ( 1997). Writing superheroes: Contemporary childhood, popular culture, and classroom literacy. New York: Teachers College Press.
13.
Dyson, A.H. ( 2003). The brothers and sisters learn to write. New York, NY: Teachers College Press
14.
Dyson, A.H. ( 2008). Staying in the (curricular) lines: Practice constraints and possibilities in childhood writing. Written Communication , 25, 119-159.
15.
Emerson, R.M., Fretz, R.I., & Shaw, L.L. ( 1995). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16.
Erickson, F. ( 1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. C. Wittrock (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 119-161). New York: Macmillan.
17.
Gee, J.P. ( 1996). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses . Philadelphia, PA: Routledge.
18.
Goldman, S.R., & Bisanz, G.L. ( 2002). Toward a functional analysis of scientific genres: Implications for understanding and learning processes. In J. Otero, J. A. Leon, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), The psychology of science text comprehension (pp. 19-50). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
19.
Glazer, B., & Strauss, A. ( 1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Aldine Transaction.
20.
Halliday, M.A.K. ( 2004). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
21.
Halliday, M.A.K., & Hasan, R. ( 1985). Language, context and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective. Deakin, Australia: Deakin University Press.
22.
Halliday, M.A.K., & Martin, J.R. ( 1993). Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
23.
Hasan, R. ( 1985). The structure of a text. In M. A. K. Halliday & R. Hasan (Eds.), Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective (pp. 52-69). Geelong, VIC, Australia:DeakinUniversityPress.
24.
Hasan, R. ( 1996). The nursery tale as a genre. In C. Cloran, D. Butt, & G. Williams (Eds.), Ways of saying, ways of meaning. London: Casssell.
25.
Hicks, D. ( 1997). Working through discourse genres in school. Research in the Teaching of English, 31, 459-485.
26.
Kamberelis, G., & Bovino, T.D. ( 1999). Cultural artifacts as scaffolds for genre development . Reading Research Quarterly, 34, 138-170.
27.
Kamberelis, G., & de la Luna, L. (2004). Children’s writing: How textual forms, contextual forces, and textual politics co-emerge. In C. Bazerman & P. Prior (Eds.), What writing does and how it does it: An introduction to analyzing texts and textual practices, (pp. 239-278). Mahwah, NJ : Erlbaum.
28.
Kress, G. ( 1993). Genre as social process. In Bill Cope & Mary Kalantzis (Eds.) The powers of literacy: a genre approach to teaching writing (p. 22-37). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
29.
Kress, G., Jewitt, C., Ogborn, J., & Tsatsarelis, M. (2001). Multimodal teaching and learning: The rhetorics of the science classroom. London : Continuum.
30.
Kurth, Lori, Kidd, Raymond, Gardner, Roberta, Smith, Edward L. ( 2002). Student use of Narrative and paradigmatic forms of talk in elementary science conversations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching39, 793-817.
Lemke, J.L. ( 2000). Multimedia literacy demands of the scientific curriculum . Linguistics and Education, 10, 247-271.
33.
Lemke, J.L. ( 2004). The literacies of science. In W. E. Saul (Ed.), Crossing borders in literacy and science instruction: Perspectives on theory and practice (pp. 33-47). Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association.
34.
Michaels, Sarah ( 1985). Hearing the connections in children's oral and written discourse. Journal of Education, 167(1), 36-56.
35.
Martin, J.R. ( 1993). A contextual theory of language. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), The powers of literacy: A genre approach to teaching writing (pp. 116-136). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
36.
Metz, K.E. ( 1995). Reassessment of developmental constraints on children’s science instruction. Review of Educational Research, 65, 93-127.
37.
Moss, B., & Newton, E. ( 2002). An examination of the informational text genre in basal readers. Reading Psychology, 23, 1-13.
38.
National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
39.
Newkirk, T. ( 1987). The non-narrative writing of young children. Research in the Teaching of English, 21, 121-144.
40.
Obgorn, J., Kress, G., Martins, I., & McGillicuddy, K. (1996). Explaining science in the classroom. Bristol, PA: Open University Press.
41.
Pappas, C.C. ( 1993). Is narrative primary? Journal of Reading Behavior, 25(1), 97-129.
42.
Pappas, C.C. ( 2006). The information book genre: Its role in integrated science literacy research and practice. Reading Research Quarterly , 41, 226-253.
43.
Pappas, Christine C., Kiefer, & Levstik ( 2006). An integrated language perspective in the elementary school: An action approach. New York, NY: Longman.
44.
Pressley, M., Rankin, J., & Yokoi, L. ( 1996). A survey of instructional practices of primary teachers nominated as effective in promoting literacy. Elementary School Journal, 96, 363-384.
45.
Purcell-Gates, V. ( 2004). Ethnographic research. In N. K. Duke & M. H. Mallette (Eds.), Literacy research methodologies (pp. 92-113). New York: Guilford Press.
46.
Rogoff, B. ( 1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.
47.
Rogoff, B. ( 2003). The cultural nature of human development. New York: Oxford University Press.
48.
Roth, Wolff-Michael ( 1997). Interactional structures during a grade 4-5 open-design engineering unit. Journal of Researchin Science Teaching, 34(3), 273-302.
49.
Schram, T.H. ( 2003). Conceptualizing qualitative inquiry: Mindwork for fieldwork in education and the social sciences. Columbus, OH: Merrill Prentice Hall.
50.
Tower, C. ( 2003). Genre development and elementary students’ informational writing: A review of the literature. Reading Research and Instruction, 42(4), 14-39.
51.
Tytler, Russell & Peterson, Suzanne ( 2000). Deconstructing learning in science-Young children’s responses to a classroom sequence on evaporation. Research in Science Education30(4), 339-355.
52.
Unsworth, Len ( 2001). Teaching multiliteracies across the curriculum: Changing contexts of text and image in classroom practice. New York, NY: Open University Press.
53.
Valsiner, J. ( 1987). Culture and the development of children’s action . Chichester, UK: John Wiley.
54.
Varelas, M., & Pappas, C.C. ( 2006). Young children’s own illustrated information books: Making sense in science through words and pictures. In R. Douglas, M. Klentschy, & K. Worth (Eds.), Linking science and literacy in the K-8 classroom (pp. 95-116). Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association Press.
55.
Vygotsky, L.S. ( 1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
56.
Wenger, E. ( 1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity . New York: Cambridge University Press.
57.
Wertsch, J.W. ( 1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
58.
Wolcott, H.F. ( 1988). Ethnographic research in education. In R. M. Jaeger (Ed.), Complementary methods for research in education. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
59.
Wollman-Bonilla, J.E. ( 2000). Teaching science writing to first graders: Genre learning and recontextualization. Research in the Teaching of English , 35, 35-65.
60.
Yin, R. ( 1994). Case-study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
61.
Yopp, Ruth Helen.Yopp, Hallie Kay ( 2000). Sharing informational text with young children. Reading Teacher, 53(5), 410-23.
