This study analyzes gender variation in nonstandard typography—specifically, abbreviations and insertions—in mobile phone text messages (SMS) posted to a public Italian interactive television (iTV) program. All broadcast SMS were collected for a period of 2 days from the Web archive for the iTV program, and the frequency and distribution of abbreviations and insertions, as well as overall message lengths, were analyzed according to sender gender. The results reveal that females posted more and longer SMS and followed more, and more varied, nonstandard typographic practices, contrary to previous gender-related findings in the sociolinguistics and computer-mediated communication literatures. A theoretically grounded explanation for these findings is developed in terms of the localized norms of a heterosexual market—and an implicit dating market—in Italian iTV SMS.
Alfonzetti, G. (1998). The conversational dimension in code-switching between Italian and dialect in Sicily. In P. Auer (Ed.), Code-switching in conversation: Language, interaction and identity (pp. 180-210). London: Routledge .
2.
Anis, J. (2007). Neography: Unconventional spelling in French SMS text messages. In B. Danet & S. C. Herring (Eds.), The multilingual Internet: Language, culture and communication online (pp. 87-116). New York: Oxford University Press.
3.
Baron, N.S. (2008). Always on: Language in an online and mobile world . New York: Oxford University Press .
4.
Barton, D., & Hall, N. (Eds.). (2000). Letter writing as a social practice. Amsterdam: John Benjamins .
5.
Beyer, Y., Enli, G.S., Maasø, A., & Ytreberg, E. (2007). Small talk makes a big difference: Recent developments in interactive, SMS-based television. Television & New Media, 8(3), 213-223.
6.
Bieswanger, M. (2007). 2 abbrevi8 or not 2 abbrevi8: A contrastive analysis of different space-and time-saving strategies in English and German text messages . Texas Linguistics Forum, 50. Retrieved March 18, 2008, from http://studentorgs.utexas.edu/salsa/proceedings/2006/Bieswanger.pdf
7.
Bolig, R., Stein, P.J., & McKenry, P.C. (1984). The self-advertisement approach to dating: Male-female differences. Family Relations, 33, 587-592.
8.
Bourdieu, P. (1977). The economics of linguistic exchanges. Social Science Information, 16(6), 645-668.
9.
Bourdieu, P. (1982). Ce que parler veut dire: L'economie des echanges linguistiques. Paris: Fayard. (English version published in 1991 as Language and symbolic power: The economy of linguistic exchange. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press)
10.
Bourdieu, P. (1998). La domination masculine. Paris : Seuil. (English version published in 2001 as Masculine domination, R. Nice, Trans. Stanford University Press)
11.
Brody, M. (1993). Manly writing: Gender, rhetoric, and the rise of composition. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
12.
Camitta, M. (1993). Vernacular writing: Varieties of literacy among Philadelphia high school students. In B. Street (Ed.), Cross-cultural approaches to literacy (pp. 228-246). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
13.
Cannon, G. (1989). Abbreviations and acronyms in English word-formation . American Speech, 64(2), 99-127.
14.
Coates, J. (1993). Women, men and language. London : Longman.
15.
Commission of the European Communities. (2007 ). European electronic communications regulation and markets 2006 (12th report). Retrieved March 18, 2008, from http://www.ebu.ch/CMSimages/en/BRUDOC_INFO_EN_361_tcm6-50763.pdf
16.
Coupland, J. (1996). Dating advertisements: Discourses of the commodified self. Discourse & Society, 7(2), 187-207.
17.
Crystal, D. (2001). Language and the Internet. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
18.
Danet, B. (2001). Cyberpl@y. London: Berg.
19.
Eckert, P. (1996). Vowels and nail polish: The emergence of linguistic style in the preadolescent heterosexual marketplace. In N. Warner, J. Ahlers, L. Bilmes, M. Oliver, S. Wertheim, & M. Chen (Eds.), Gender and belief systems: Proceedings of the Fourth Berkeley Women & Language Conference (pp. 183-190). Retrieved October 6, 2008, from http://www.stanford.edu/~eckert/PDF/nailpolish.pdf
20.
Eckert, P., & McConnell-Ginet, S. (1999). New generalizations and explanations in language and gender research. Language in Society, 28(2), 185-202.
21.
Fasold, R. (1990). The sociolinguistics of language. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
22.
Ferrara, K., Brunner, H., & Whittemore, G. (1991). Interactive written discourse as an emergent register. Written Communication, 8(1), 8-34.
23.
Fortunati, L. (2002). Italy: Stereotypes, true and false. In J. E. Katz & M. Aakhus (Eds.), Perpetual contact: Mobile communication, private talk, public performance (pp. 42-63). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
24.
Hård af Segerstad, Y. (2002). Use and adaptation of written language to the conditions of computer-mediated communication. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Gothenburg University, Sweden .
25.
Hearn, J. (Ed.). (1992). Men in the public eye: The construction and deconstruction of public men and public patriarchies. London: Routledge .
26.
Herring, S.C. (1994). Politeness in computer culture: Why women thank and men flame. In M. Bucholtz, A. C. Liang, L. A. Sutton, & C. Hines (Eds.), Cultural performances: Proceedings of the Third Berkeley Women and Language Conference (pp. 278-294). Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Women and Language Group.
27.
Herring, S.C. (2001). Computer-mediated discourse. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, & H. Hamilton (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 612-634). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
28.
Herring, S.C. (2003). Gender and power in online communication. In J. Holmes & M. Meyerhoff (Eds.), The handbook of language and gender (pp. 202-228). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
29.
Herring, S.C. (2007). A faceted classification scheme for computer-mediated discourse. Language@Internet, 4, Article 1. Retrieved October 6, 2008, from http://www.languageatinternet.de/articles/2007/761
30.
Janssen, A., & Murachver, T. (2004). The relationship between gender and topic in gender-preferential language use. Written Communication, 21(4), 344-367.
31.
Labov, W. (1990). The intersection of sex and social class in the course of linguistic change. Language Variation and Change , 2(2), 205-254.
32.
Ling, R. (2005). The socio-linguistics of SMS: An analysis of SMS use by a random sample of Norwegians. In R. Ling & P. Pedersen (Eds.), Mobile communications: Renegotiation of the social sphere (pp. 335-349). London: Springer.
33.
Maynor, N. (1994). The language of electronic mail: Written speech? In G. D. Little & M. Montgomery (Eds.), Centennial usage studies (pp. 48-54). Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press .
34.
Melchers, G., Taavitsainen, I., & Pahta, P. (Eds.). (2000). Writing in nonstandard English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
35.
Mioni, A. (1983). Italiano tendenziale: Osservazioni su alcuni aspetti della standardizzazione [Tendencies in Italian: Observations regarding some aspects of standardization]. In P. Beninca (Ed.), Scritti linguistici in onore di Giovan Battista Pellegrini (Vol. 1, pp. 495-517). Pisa, Italy: Pacini.
36.
Nastri, J., Peña, J., & Hancock, J.T. (2006). The construction of away messages: A speech act analysis. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(4), Article 7. Retrieved October 6, 2008, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol11/issue4/nastri.html
37.
Norman, D.A. (2004). Emotional design: Why we love (or hate) everyday things. New York: Basic Books.
38.
Panyametheekul, S., & Herring, S.C. (2003). Gender and turn allocation in a Thai chat room . Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 9(1). Retrieved March 18, 2008, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol9/issue1/panya_herring.html
39.
Pietrini, D. (2001). <<X' 6 :-( ?>>: Gli sms e il trionfo dell'informalità e della scrittura ludica [<<X? 6 :-( ?>>: SMS and the triumph of informality and playful writing]. Italienisch, 46, 92-101.
40.
Pistolesi, E. (2004). Il parlar spedito, L'italiano di chat, e-mail e SMS [Unrestricted talk, Italian in chat, e-mail and SMS]. Padova, Italy: Esedra.
41.
Schiffman, H.F. (2002). French language policy: Centrism, Orwellian "dirigisme," or economic determination? In L. Wei, J.-M. Dewaele, & A. Housen (Eds.), Opportunities and challenges of bilingualism (pp. 89-104). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
42.
Selfe, C., & Meyer, P. (1991). Testing claims for on-line conferences. Written Communication, 8(2), 163-192.
43.
Spender, D. (1980). Man made language. London: Routledge.
44.
Trudgill, P. (1972). Sex, covert prestige and linguistic change in the urban British English of Norwich. Language in Society , 1, 179-195.
45.
Waseleski, C. (2006). Gender and the use of exclamation points in computer-mediated communication: An analysis of exclamations posted to two electronic discussion lists. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(4), Article 6. Retrieved September 25, 2006, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol11/issue4/waseleski.html
46.
Witmer, D., & Katzman, S. (1997). On-line smiles: Does gender make a difference in the use of graphic accents?Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 2(4). Retrieved March 18, 2008, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol2/issue4/witmer1.html
47.
Yates, S., Mills, S., Lockley, E., & Doherty, K. (2004, July). Gender, "face" management and mediated interaction . Paper presented at the 9th International Pragmatics Conference, Riva del Garda, Italy.
48.
Zarantonello, G. (2001). Nuovi media ed italiano parlato: gli SMS [New media and spoken Italian: SMS]. Comunitàzioni.it. Retrieved September 24, 2006, from http://www.comunitazione.it/leggi.asp?id_art=87&id_area=9&mac=1
49.
Zelenkauskaite, A. (2004). Lietuvišku , itališku ir kroatišku internetinių pokalbių rašyba [Lithuanian, Italian, and Croatian written chat on the Internet]. Unpublished master's thesis, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.
50.
Zelenkauskaite, A., & Herring, S.C. (2006). Gender encoding of typographical elements in Lithuanian and Croatian IRC. In F. Sudweeks & C. Ess (Eds.), Proceedings of cultural attitudes towards technology and communication 2006 (pp. 474-489). Murdoch, Australia: Murdoch University Press.
51.
Zelenkauskaite, A., & Herring, S.C. (2008a). Gender differences in personal advertisements in Lithuanian iTV SMS. In F. Sudweeks, H. Hrachovec, & C. Ess (Eds.), Proceedings of cultural attitudes towards technology and communication 2008 (pp. 462-476). Murdoch, Australia: School of Information Technology, Murdoch University .
52.
Zelenkauskaite, A., & Herring, S.C. (2008b). Television-mediated conversation: Coherence in Italian iTV SMS chat. In Proceedings of the Forty-First Hawai'i International Conference on System Sciences (pp.). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Press. Retrieved November 10, 2008, from http://www.2.computer.org/portal/web/csdl/proceedings/h#5
53.
Zhang, Q. (2006). Cosmopolitan Mandarin: Linguistic practice of Chinese waiqi professionals. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication , 16(2), 215-235.
